Cargando…
A Comparison of the Costs and Benefits of Bacterial Gene Expression
To study how a bacterium allocates its resources, we compared the costs and benefits of most (86%) of the proteins in Escherichia coli K-12 during growth in minimal glucose medium. The cost or investment in each protein was estimated from ribosomal profiling data, and the benefit of each protein was...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27711251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164314 |
_version_ | 1782458435168632832 |
---|---|
author | Price, Morgan N. Wetmore, Kelly M. Deutschbauer, Adam M. Arkin, Adam P. |
author_facet | Price, Morgan N. Wetmore, Kelly M. Deutschbauer, Adam M. Arkin, Adam P. |
author_sort | Price, Morgan N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To study how a bacterium allocates its resources, we compared the costs and benefits of most (86%) of the proteins in Escherichia coli K-12 during growth in minimal glucose medium. The cost or investment in each protein was estimated from ribosomal profiling data, and the benefit of each protein was measured by assaying a library of transposon mutants. We found that proteins that are important for fitness are usually highly expressed, and 95% of these proteins are expressed at above 13 parts per million (ppm). Conversely, proteins that do not measurably benefit the host (with a benefit of less than 5% per generation) tend to be weakly expressed, with a median expression of 13 ppm. In aggregate, genes with no detectable benefit account for 31% of protein production, or about 22% if we correct for genetic redundancy. Although some of the apparently unnecessary expression could have subtle benefits in minimal glucose medium, the majority of the burden is due to genes that are important in other conditions. We propose that at least 13% of the cell’s protein is “on standby” in case conditions change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5053530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50535302016-10-27 A Comparison of the Costs and Benefits of Bacterial Gene Expression Price, Morgan N. Wetmore, Kelly M. Deutschbauer, Adam M. Arkin, Adam P. PLoS One Research Article To study how a bacterium allocates its resources, we compared the costs and benefits of most (86%) of the proteins in Escherichia coli K-12 during growth in minimal glucose medium. The cost or investment in each protein was estimated from ribosomal profiling data, and the benefit of each protein was measured by assaying a library of transposon mutants. We found that proteins that are important for fitness are usually highly expressed, and 95% of these proteins are expressed at above 13 parts per million (ppm). Conversely, proteins that do not measurably benefit the host (with a benefit of less than 5% per generation) tend to be weakly expressed, with a median expression of 13 ppm. In aggregate, genes with no detectable benefit account for 31% of protein production, or about 22% if we correct for genetic redundancy. Although some of the apparently unnecessary expression could have subtle benefits in minimal glucose medium, the majority of the burden is due to genes that are important in other conditions. We propose that at least 13% of the cell’s protein is “on standby” in case conditions change. Public Library of Science 2016-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5053530/ /pubmed/27711251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164314 Text en © 2016 Price et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Price, Morgan N. Wetmore, Kelly M. Deutschbauer, Adam M. Arkin, Adam P. A Comparison of the Costs and Benefits of Bacterial Gene Expression |
title | A Comparison of the Costs and Benefits of Bacterial Gene Expression |
title_full | A Comparison of the Costs and Benefits of Bacterial Gene Expression |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of the Costs and Benefits of Bacterial Gene Expression |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of the Costs and Benefits of Bacterial Gene Expression |
title_short | A Comparison of the Costs and Benefits of Bacterial Gene Expression |
title_sort | comparison of the costs and benefits of bacterial gene expression |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27711251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pricemorgann acomparisonofthecostsandbenefitsofbacterialgeneexpression AT wetmorekellym acomparisonofthecostsandbenefitsofbacterialgeneexpression AT deutschbaueradamm acomparisonofthecostsandbenefitsofbacterialgeneexpression AT arkinadamp acomparisonofthecostsandbenefitsofbacterialgeneexpression AT pricemorgann comparisonofthecostsandbenefitsofbacterialgeneexpression AT wetmorekellym comparisonofthecostsandbenefitsofbacterialgeneexpression AT deutschbaueradamm comparisonofthecostsandbenefitsofbacterialgeneexpression AT arkinadamp comparisonofthecostsandbenefitsofbacterialgeneexpression |