Cargando…

A Comparison of the Costs and Benefits of Bacterial Gene Expression

To study how a bacterium allocates its resources, we compared the costs and benefits of most (86%) of the proteins in Escherichia coli K-12 during growth in minimal glucose medium. The cost or investment in each protein was estimated from ribosomal profiling data, and the benefit of each protein was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Price, Morgan N., Wetmore, Kelly M., Deutschbauer, Adam M., Arkin, Adam P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27711251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164314
_version_ 1782458435168632832
author Price, Morgan N.
Wetmore, Kelly M.
Deutschbauer, Adam M.
Arkin, Adam P.
author_facet Price, Morgan N.
Wetmore, Kelly M.
Deutschbauer, Adam M.
Arkin, Adam P.
author_sort Price, Morgan N.
collection PubMed
description To study how a bacterium allocates its resources, we compared the costs and benefits of most (86%) of the proteins in Escherichia coli K-12 during growth in minimal glucose medium. The cost or investment in each protein was estimated from ribosomal profiling data, and the benefit of each protein was measured by assaying a library of transposon mutants. We found that proteins that are important for fitness are usually highly expressed, and 95% of these proteins are expressed at above 13 parts per million (ppm). Conversely, proteins that do not measurably benefit the host (with a benefit of less than 5% per generation) tend to be weakly expressed, with a median expression of 13 ppm. In aggregate, genes with no detectable benefit account for 31% of protein production, or about 22% if we correct for genetic redundancy. Although some of the apparently unnecessary expression could have subtle benefits in minimal glucose medium, the majority of the burden is due to genes that are important in other conditions. We propose that at least 13% of the cell’s protein is “on standby” in case conditions change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5053530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50535302016-10-27 A Comparison of the Costs and Benefits of Bacterial Gene Expression Price, Morgan N. Wetmore, Kelly M. Deutschbauer, Adam M. Arkin, Adam P. PLoS One Research Article To study how a bacterium allocates its resources, we compared the costs and benefits of most (86%) of the proteins in Escherichia coli K-12 during growth in minimal glucose medium. The cost or investment in each protein was estimated from ribosomal profiling data, and the benefit of each protein was measured by assaying a library of transposon mutants. We found that proteins that are important for fitness are usually highly expressed, and 95% of these proteins are expressed at above 13 parts per million (ppm). Conversely, proteins that do not measurably benefit the host (with a benefit of less than 5% per generation) tend to be weakly expressed, with a median expression of 13 ppm. In aggregate, genes with no detectable benefit account for 31% of protein production, or about 22% if we correct for genetic redundancy. Although some of the apparently unnecessary expression could have subtle benefits in minimal glucose medium, the majority of the burden is due to genes that are important in other conditions. We propose that at least 13% of the cell’s protein is “on standby” in case conditions change. Public Library of Science 2016-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5053530/ /pubmed/27711251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164314 Text en © 2016 Price et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Price, Morgan N.
Wetmore, Kelly M.
Deutschbauer, Adam M.
Arkin, Adam P.
A Comparison of the Costs and Benefits of Bacterial Gene Expression
title A Comparison of the Costs and Benefits of Bacterial Gene Expression
title_full A Comparison of the Costs and Benefits of Bacterial Gene Expression
title_fullStr A Comparison of the Costs and Benefits of Bacterial Gene Expression
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of the Costs and Benefits of Bacterial Gene Expression
title_short A Comparison of the Costs and Benefits of Bacterial Gene Expression
title_sort comparison of the costs and benefits of bacterial gene expression
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27711251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164314
work_keys_str_mv AT pricemorgann acomparisonofthecostsandbenefitsofbacterialgeneexpression
AT wetmorekellym acomparisonofthecostsandbenefitsofbacterialgeneexpression
AT deutschbaueradamm acomparisonofthecostsandbenefitsofbacterialgeneexpression
AT arkinadamp acomparisonofthecostsandbenefitsofbacterialgeneexpression
AT pricemorgann comparisonofthecostsandbenefitsofbacterialgeneexpression
AT wetmorekellym comparisonofthecostsandbenefitsofbacterialgeneexpression
AT deutschbaueradamm comparisonofthecostsandbenefitsofbacterialgeneexpression
AT arkinadamp comparisonofthecostsandbenefitsofbacterialgeneexpression