Cargando…
Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review
The PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) is a new method for the quantitative assessment of metabolic changes in solid tumors. The assessments of tumor response between the RECIST and PERCIST have shown considerable difference in several studies. This pooled study was conducted to compare...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27036043 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8425 |
_version_ | 1782458463141494784 |
---|---|
author | Min, Seon Jeong Jang, Hyun Joo Kim, Jung Han |
author_facet | Min, Seon Jeong Jang, Hyun Joo Kim, Jung Han |
author_sort | Min, Seon Jeong |
collection | PubMed |
description | The PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) is a new method for the quantitative assessment of metabolic changes in solid tumors. The assessments of tumor response between the RECIST and PERCIST have shown considerable difference in several studies. This pooled study was conducted to compare tumor response according to the two criteria in patients with solid tumors. We surveyed MEDLINE, EMBASE and PUBMED for articles with terms of the RECIST or PERCIST from 2009 and January 2016. There were six articles comparing the RECIST and PERCIST. A total of 268 patients were recruited; 81 with colorectal cancer, 60 with lung cancer, 48 with esophageal cancer, 28 with breast cancer, 14 with basal cell carcinoma, 12 with stomach cancer, 10 with head and neck cancer, and 16 with other rare cancers. The agreement of tumor response between the RECIST and PERCIST was moderate (k = 0.590). Of 268 patients, 101 (37.7%) showed discordance in the tumor responses between two criteria. When adopting the PERCIST, tumor response was upgraded in 85 patients and downgraded in 16. The estimated overall response rates were significantly different between two criteria (35.1% by RECIST vs. 54.1% by PERCIST, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, this pooled analysis demonstrates that the concordance of tumor responses between the RECIST and PERCIST criteria is not excellent. The PERCIST might be more suitable for assessing tumor response than the RECIST criteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5053692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50536922016-10-12 Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review Min, Seon Jeong Jang, Hyun Joo Kim, Jung Han Oncotarget Research Paper The PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) is a new method for the quantitative assessment of metabolic changes in solid tumors. The assessments of tumor response between the RECIST and PERCIST have shown considerable difference in several studies. This pooled study was conducted to compare tumor response according to the two criteria in patients with solid tumors. We surveyed MEDLINE, EMBASE and PUBMED for articles with terms of the RECIST or PERCIST from 2009 and January 2016. There were six articles comparing the RECIST and PERCIST. A total of 268 patients were recruited; 81 with colorectal cancer, 60 with lung cancer, 48 with esophageal cancer, 28 with breast cancer, 14 with basal cell carcinoma, 12 with stomach cancer, 10 with head and neck cancer, and 16 with other rare cancers. The agreement of tumor response between the RECIST and PERCIST was moderate (k = 0.590). Of 268 patients, 101 (37.7%) showed discordance in the tumor responses between two criteria. When adopting the PERCIST, tumor response was upgraded in 85 patients and downgraded in 16. The estimated overall response rates were significantly different between two criteria (35.1% by RECIST vs. 54.1% by PERCIST, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, this pooled analysis demonstrates that the concordance of tumor responses between the RECIST and PERCIST criteria is not excellent. The PERCIST might be more suitable for assessing tumor response than the RECIST criteria. Impact Journals LLC 2016-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5053692/ /pubmed/27036043 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8425 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Min et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Min, Seon Jeong Jang, Hyun Joo Kim, Jung Han Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review |
title | Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review |
title_full | Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review |
title_short | Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review |
title_sort | comparison of the recist and percist criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27036043 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8425 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minseonjeong comparisonoftherecistandpercistcriteriainsolidtumorsapooledanalysisandreview AT janghyunjoo comparisonoftherecistandpercistcriteriainsolidtumorsapooledanalysisandreview AT kimjunghan comparisonoftherecistandpercistcriteriainsolidtumorsapooledanalysisandreview |