Cargando…

Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review

The PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) is a new method for the quantitative assessment of metabolic changes in solid tumors. The assessments of tumor response between the RECIST and PERCIST have shown considerable difference in several studies. This pooled study was conducted to compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Min, Seon Jeong, Jang, Hyun Joo, Kim, Jung Han
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27036043
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8425
_version_ 1782458463141494784
author Min, Seon Jeong
Jang, Hyun Joo
Kim, Jung Han
author_facet Min, Seon Jeong
Jang, Hyun Joo
Kim, Jung Han
author_sort Min, Seon Jeong
collection PubMed
description The PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) is a new method for the quantitative assessment of metabolic changes in solid tumors. The assessments of tumor response between the RECIST and PERCIST have shown considerable difference in several studies. This pooled study was conducted to compare tumor response according to the two criteria in patients with solid tumors. We surveyed MEDLINE, EMBASE and PUBMED for articles with terms of the RECIST or PERCIST from 2009 and January 2016. There were six articles comparing the RECIST and PERCIST. A total of 268 patients were recruited; 81 with colorectal cancer, 60 with lung cancer, 48 with esophageal cancer, 28 with breast cancer, 14 with basal cell carcinoma, 12 with stomach cancer, 10 with head and neck cancer, and 16 with other rare cancers. The agreement of tumor response between the RECIST and PERCIST was moderate (k = 0.590). Of 268 patients, 101 (37.7%) showed discordance in the tumor responses between two criteria. When adopting the PERCIST, tumor response was upgraded in 85 patients and downgraded in 16. The estimated overall response rates were significantly different between two criteria (35.1% by RECIST vs. 54.1% by PERCIST, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, this pooled analysis demonstrates that the concordance of tumor responses between the RECIST and PERCIST criteria is not excellent. The PERCIST might be more suitable for assessing tumor response than the RECIST criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5053692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50536922016-10-12 Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review Min, Seon Jeong Jang, Hyun Joo Kim, Jung Han Oncotarget Research Paper The PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) is a new method for the quantitative assessment of metabolic changes in solid tumors. The assessments of tumor response between the RECIST and PERCIST have shown considerable difference in several studies. This pooled study was conducted to compare tumor response according to the two criteria in patients with solid tumors. We surveyed MEDLINE, EMBASE and PUBMED for articles with terms of the RECIST or PERCIST from 2009 and January 2016. There were six articles comparing the RECIST and PERCIST. A total of 268 patients were recruited; 81 with colorectal cancer, 60 with lung cancer, 48 with esophageal cancer, 28 with breast cancer, 14 with basal cell carcinoma, 12 with stomach cancer, 10 with head and neck cancer, and 16 with other rare cancers. The agreement of tumor response between the RECIST and PERCIST was moderate (k = 0.590). Of 268 patients, 101 (37.7%) showed discordance in the tumor responses between two criteria. When adopting the PERCIST, tumor response was upgraded in 85 patients and downgraded in 16. The estimated overall response rates were significantly different between two criteria (35.1% by RECIST vs. 54.1% by PERCIST, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, this pooled analysis demonstrates that the concordance of tumor responses between the RECIST and PERCIST criteria is not excellent. The PERCIST might be more suitable for assessing tumor response than the RECIST criteria. Impact Journals LLC 2016-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5053692/ /pubmed/27036043 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8425 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Min et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Min, Seon Jeong
Jang, Hyun Joo
Kim, Jung Han
Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review
title Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review
title_full Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review
title_fullStr Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review
title_short Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review
title_sort comparison of the recist and percist criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27036043
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8425
work_keys_str_mv AT minseonjeong comparisonoftherecistandpercistcriteriainsolidtumorsapooledanalysisandreview
AT janghyunjoo comparisonoftherecistandpercistcriteriainsolidtumorsapooledanalysisandreview
AT kimjunghan comparisonoftherecistandpercistcriteriainsolidtumorsapooledanalysisandreview