Cargando…

Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity

Recent studies have shown that past selection history affects the allocation of attention on target selection. However, it is unclear whether context-driven selection history can modulate the efficacy of attention allocation on working memory (WM) representations. This study tests the influences of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kuo, Bo-Cheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774082
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01564
_version_ 1782458502364528640
author Kuo, Bo-Cheng
author_facet Kuo, Bo-Cheng
author_sort Kuo, Bo-Cheng
collection PubMed
description Recent studies have shown that past selection history affects the allocation of attention on target selection. However, it is unclear whether context-driven selection history can modulate the efficacy of attention allocation on working memory (WM) representations. This study tests the influences of selection history on WM capacity. A display of one item (low load) or three/four items (high load) was shown for the participants to hold in WM in a delayed response task. Participants then judged whether a probe item was in the memory display or not. Selection history was defined as the number of items attended across trials in the task context within a block, manipulated by the stimulus set-size in the contexts with fewer possible stimuli (4-item or 5-item context) or more possible stimuli (8-item or 9-item context) from which the memorized content was selected. The capacity measure (i.e., the K measure) was estimated to reflect the number of items that can be held in WM. Across four behavioral experiments, the results revealed that the capacity was significantly reduced in the context with more possible stimuli relative to the context with fewer possible stimuli. Moreover, the reduction in capacity was significant for high WM load and not observed when the focus was on only a single item. Together, these findings indicate that context-driven selection history and focused attention influence WM capacity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5053993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50539932016-10-21 Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity Kuo, Bo-Cheng Front Psychol Psychology Recent studies have shown that past selection history affects the allocation of attention on target selection. However, it is unclear whether context-driven selection history can modulate the efficacy of attention allocation on working memory (WM) representations. This study tests the influences of selection history on WM capacity. A display of one item (low load) or three/four items (high load) was shown for the participants to hold in WM in a delayed response task. Participants then judged whether a probe item was in the memory display or not. Selection history was defined as the number of items attended across trials in the task context within a block, manipulated by the stimulus set-size in the contexts with fewer possible stimuli (4-item or 5-item context) or more possible stimuli (8-item or 9-item context) from which the memorized content was selected. The capacity measure (i.e., the K measure) was estimated to reflect the number of items that can be held in WM. Across four behavioral experiments, the results revealed that the capacity was significantly reduced in the context with more possible stimuli relative to the context with fewer possible stimuli. Moreover, the reduction in capacity was significant for high WM load and not observed when the focus was on only a single item. Together, these findings indicate that context-driven selection history and focused attention influence WM capacity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5053993/ /pubmed/27774082 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01564 Text en Copyright © 2016 Kuo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Kuo, Bo-Cheng
Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity
title Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity
title_full Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity
title_fullStr Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity
title_full_unstemmed Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity
title_short Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity
title_sort selection history modulates working memory capacity
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774082
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01564
work_keys_str_mv AT kuobocheng selectionhistorymodulatesworkingmemorycapacity