Cargando…
Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity
Recent studies have shown that past selection history affects the allocation of attention on target selection. However, it is unclear whether context-driven selection history can modulate the efficacy of attention allocation on working memory (WM) representations. This study tests the influences of...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774082 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01564 |
_version_ | 1782458502364528640 |
---|---|
author | Kuo, Bo-Cheng |
author_facet | Kuo, Bo-Cheng |
author_sort | Kuo, Bo-Cheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent studies have shown that past selection history affects the allocation of attention on target selection. However, it is unclear whether context-driven selection history can modulate the efficacy of attention allocation on working memory (WM) representations. This study tests the influences of selection history on WM capacity. A display of one item (low load) or three/four items (high load) was shown for the participants to hold in WM in a delayed response task. Participants then judged whether a probe item was in the memory display or not. Selection history was defined as the number of items attended across trials in the task context within a block, manipulated by the stimulus set-size in the contexts with fewer possible stimuli (4-item or 5-item context) or more possible stimuli (8-item or 9-item context) from which the memorized content was selected. The capacity measure (i.e., the K measure) was estimated to reflect the number of items that can be held in WM. Across four behavioral experiments, the results revealed that the capacity was significantly reduced in the context with more possible stimuli relative to the context with fewer possible stimuli. Moreover, the reduction in capacity was significant for high WM load and not observed when the focus was on only a single item. Together, these findings indicate that context-driven selection history and focused attention influence WM capacity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5053993 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50539932016-10-21 Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity Kuo, Bo-Cheng Front Psychol Psychology Recent studies have shown that past selection history affects the allocation of attention on target selection. However, it is unclear whether context-driven selection history can modulate the efficacy of attention allocation on working memory (WM) representations. This study tests the influences of selection history on WM capacity. A display of one item (low load) or three/four items (high load) was shown for the participants to hold in WM in a delayed response task. Participants then judged whether a probe item was in the memory display or not. Selection history was defined as the number of items attended across trials in the task context within a block, manipulated by the stimulus set-size in the contexts with fewer possible stimuli (4-item or 5-item context) or more possible stimuli (8-item or 9-item context) from which the memorized content was selected. The capacity measure (i.e., the K measure) was estimated to reflect the number of items that can be held in WM. Across four behavioral experiments, the results revealed that the capacity was significantly reduced in the context with more possible stimuli relative to the context with fewer possible stimuli. Moreover, the reduction in capacity was significant for high WM load and not observed when the focus was on only a single item. Together, these findings indicate that context-driven selection history and focused attention influence WM capacity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5053993/ /pubmed/27774082 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01564 Text en Copyright © 2016 Kuo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Kuo, Bo-Cheng Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity |
title | Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity |
title_full | Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity |
title_fullStr | Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity |
title_full_unstemmed | Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity |
title_short | Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity |
title_sort | selection history modulates working memory capacity |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774082 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01564 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuobocheng selectionhistorymodulatesworkingmemorycapacity |