Cargando…

Differential transcriptional responses to Ebola and Marburg virus infection in bat and human cells

The unprecedented outbreak of Ebola in West Africa resulted in over 28,000 cases and 11,000 deaths, underlining the need for a better understanding of the biology of this highly pathogenic virus to develop specific counter strategies. Two filoviruses, the Ebola and Marburg viruses, result in a sever...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hölzer, Martin, Krähling, Verena, Amman, Fabian, Barth, Emanuel, Bernhart, Stephan H., Carmelo, Victor A. O., Collatz, Maximilian, Doose, Gero, Eggenhofer, Florian, Ewald, Jan, Fallmann, Jörg, Feldhahn, Lasse M., Fricke, Markus, Gebauer, Juliane, Gruber, Andreas J., Hufsky, Franziska, Indrischek, Henrike, Kanton, Sabina, Linde, Jörg, Mostajo, Nelly, Ochsenreiter, Roman, Riege, Konstantin, Rivarola-Duarte, Lorena, Sahyoun, Abdullah H., Saunders, Sita J., Seemann, Stefan E., Tanzer, Andrea, Vogel, Bertram, Wehner, Stefanie, Wolfinger, Michael T., Backofen, Rolf, Gorodkin, Jan, Grosse, Ivo, Hofacker, Ivo, Hoffmann, Steve, Kaleta, Christoph, Stadler, Peter F., Becker, Stephan, Marz, Manja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27713552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34589
_version_ 1782458589392142336
author Hölzer, Martin
Krähling, Verena
Amman, Fabian
Barth, Emanuel
Bernhart, Stephan H.
Carmelo, Victor A. O.
Collatz, Maximilian
Doose, Gero
Eggenhofer, Florian
Ewald, Jan
Fallmann, Jörg
Feldhahn, Lasse M.
Fricke, Markus
Gebauer, Juliane
Gruber, Andreas J.
Hufsky, Franziska
Indrischek, Henrike
Kanton, Sabina
Linde, Jörg
Mostajo, Nelly
Ochsenreiter, Roman
Riege, Konstantin
Rivarola-Duarte, Lorena
Sahyoun, Abdullah H.
Saunders, Sita J.
Seemann, Stefan E.
Tanzer, Andrea
Vogel, Bertram
Wehner, Stefanie
Wolfinger, Michael T.
Backofen, Rolf
Gorodkin, Jan
Grosse, Ivo
Hofacker, Ivo
Hoffmann, Steve
Kaleta, Christoph
Stadler, Peter F.
Becker, Stephan
Marz, Manja
author_facet Hölzer, Martin
Krähling, Verena
Amman, Fabian
Barth, Emanuel
Bernhart, Stephan H.
Carmelo, Victor A. O.
Collatz, Maximilian
Doose, Gero
Eggenhofer, Florian
Ewald, Jan
Fallmann, Jörg
Feldhahn, Lasse M.
Fricke, Markus
Gebauer, Juliane
Gruber, Andreas J.
Hufsky, Franziska
Indrischek, Henrike
Kanton, Sabina
Linde, Jörg
Mostajo, Nelly
Ochsenreiter, Roman
Riege, Konstantin
Rivarola-Duarte, Lorena
Sahyoun, Abdullah H.
Saunders, Sita J.
Seemann, Stefan E.
Tanzer, Andrea
Vogel, Bertram
Wehner, Stefanie
Wolfinger, Michael T.
Backofen, Rolf
Gorodkin, Jan
Grosse, Ivo
Hofacker, Ivo
Hoffmann, Steve
Kaleta, Christoph
Stadler, Peter F.
Becker, Stephan
Marz, Manja
author_sort Hölzer, Martin
collection PubMed
description The unprecedented outbreak of Ebola in West Africa resulted in over 28,000 cases and 11,000 deaths, underlining the need for a better understanding of the biology of this highly pathogenic virus to develop specific counter strategies. Two filoviruses, the Ebola and Marburg viruses, result in a severe and often fatal infection in humans. However, bats are natural hosts and survive filovirus infections without obvious symptoms. The molecular basis of this striking difference in the response to filovirus infections is not well understood. We report a systematic overview of differentially expressed genes, activity motifs and pathways in human and bat cells infected with the Ebola and Marburg viruses, and we demonstrate that the replication of filoviruses is more rapid in human cells than in bat cells. We also found that the most strongly regulated genes upon filovirus infection are chemokine ligands and transcription factors. We observed a strong induction of the JAK/STAT pathway, of several genes encoding inhibitors of MAP kinases (DUSP genes) and of PPP1R15A, which is involved in ER stress-induced cell death. We used comparative transcriptomics to provide a data resource that can be used to identify cellular responses that might allow bats to survive filovirus infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5054393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50543932016-10-19 Differential transcriptional responses to Ebola and Marburg virus infection in bat and human cells Hölzer, Martin Krähling, Verena Amman, Fabian Barth, Emanuel Bernhart, Stephan H. Carmelo, Victor A. O. Collatz, Maximilian Doose, Gero Eggenhofer, Florian Ewald, Jan Fallmann, Jörg Feldhahn, Lasse M. Fricke, Markus Gebauer, Juliane Gruber, Andreas J. Hufsky, Franziska Indrischek, Henrike Kanton, Sabina Linde, Jörg Mostajo, Nelly Ochsenreiter, Roman Riege, Konstantin Rivarola-Duarte, Lorena Sahyoun, Abdullah H. Saunders, Sita J. Seemann, Stefan E. Tanzer, Andrea Vogel, Bertram Wehner, Stefanie Wolfinger, Michael T. Backofen, Rolf Gorodkin, Jan Grosse, Ivo Hofacker, Ivo Hoffmann, Steve Kaleta, Christoph Stadler, Peter F. Becker, Stephan Marz, Manja Sci Rep Article The unprecedented outbreak of Ebola in West Africa resulted in over 28,000 cases and 11,000 deaths, underlining the need for a better understanding of the biology of this highly pathogenic virus to develop specific counter strategies. Two filoviruses, the Ebola and Marburg viruses, result in a severe and often fatal infection in humans. However, bats are natural hosts and survive filovirus infections without obvious symptoms. The molecular basis of this striking difference in the response to filovirus infections is not well understood. We report a systematic overview of differentially expressed genes, activity motifs and pathways in human and bat cells infected with the Ebola and Marburg viruses, and we demonstrate that the replication of filoviruses is more rapid in human cells than in bat cells. We also found that the most strongly regulated genes upon filovirus infection are chemokine ligands and transcription factors. We observed a strong induction of the JAK/STAT pathway, of several genes encoding inhibitors of MAP kinases (DUSP genes) and of PPP1R15A, which is involved in ER stress-induced cell death. We used comparative transcriptomics to provide a data resource that can be used to identify cellular responses that might allow bats to survive filovirus infections. Nature Publishing Group 2016-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5054393/ /pubmed/27713552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34589 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Hölzer, Martin
Krähling, Verena
Amman, Fabian
Barth, Emanuel
Bernhart, Stephan H.
Carmelo, Victor A. O.
Collatz, Maximilian
Doose, Gero
Eggenhofer, Florian
Ewald, Jan
Fallmann, Jörg
Feldhahn, Lasse M.
Fricke, Markus
Gebauer, Juliane
Gruber, Andreas J.
Hufsky, Franziska
Indrischek, Henrike
Kanton, Sabina
Linde, Jörg
Mostajo, Nelly
Ochsenreiter, Roman
Riege, Konstantin
Rivarola-Duarte, Lorena
Sahyoun, Abdullah H.
Saunders, Sita J.
Seemann, Stefan E.
Tanzer, Andrea
Vogel, Bertram
Wehner, Stefanie
Wolfinger, Michael T.
Backofen, Rolf
Gorodkin, Jan
Grosse, Ivo
Hofacker, Ivo
Hoffmann, Steve
Kaleta, Christoph
Stadler, Peter F.
Becker, Stephan
Marz, Manja
Differential transcriptional responses to Ebola and Marburg virus infection in bat and human cells
title Differential transcriptional responses to Ebola and Marburg virus infection in bat and human cells
title_full Differential transcriptional responses to Ebola and Marburg virus infection in bat and human cells
title_fullStr Differential transcriptional responses to Ebola and Marburg virus infection in bat and human cells
title_full_unstemmed Differential transcriptional responses to Ebola and Marburg virus infection in bat and human cells
title_short Differential transcriptional responses to Ebola and Marburg virus infection in bat and human cells
title_sort differential transcriptional responses to ebola and marburg virus infection in bat and human cells
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27713552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34589
work_keys_str_mv AT holzermartin differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT krahlingverena differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT ammanfabian differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT barthemanuel differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT bernhartstephanh differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT carmelovictorao differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT collatzmaximilian differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT doosegero differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT eggenhoferflorian differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT ewaldjan differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT fallmannjorg differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT feldhahnlassem differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT frickemarkus differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT gebauerjuliane differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT gruberandreasj differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT hufskyfranziska differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT indrischekhenrike differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT kantonsabina differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT lindejorg differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT mostajonelly differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT ochsenreiterroman differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT riegekonstantin differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT rivaroladuartelorena differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT sahyounabdullahh differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT saunderssitaj differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT seemannstefane differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT tanzerandrea differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT vogelbertram differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT wehnerstefanie differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT wolfingermichaelt differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT backofenrolf differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT gorodkinjan differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT grosseivo differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT hofackerivo differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT hoffmannsteve differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT kaletachristoph differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT stadlerpeterf differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT beckerstephan differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells
AT marzmanja differentialtranscriptionalresponsestoebolaandmarburgvirusinfectioninbatandhumancells