Cargando…
Prediction of gestational age based on genome-wide differentially methylated regions
BACKGROUND: We explored the association between gestational age and cord blood DNA methylation at birth and whether DNA methylation could be effective in predicting gestational age due to limitations with the presently used methods. We used data from the Norwegian Mother and Child Birth Cohort study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27717397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1063-4 |
_version_ | 1782458625242955776 |
---|---|
author | Bohlin, J. Håberg, S. E. Magnus, P. Reese, S. E. Gjessing, H. K. Magnus, M. C. Parr, C. L. Page, C. M. London, S. J. Nystad, W. |
author_facet | Bohlin, J. Håberg, S. E. Magnus, P. Reese, S. E. Gjessing, H. K. Magnus, M. C. Parr, C. L. Page, C. M. London, S. J. Nystad, W. |
author_sort | Bohlin, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We explored the association between gestational age and cord blood DNA methylation at birth and whether DNA methylation could be effective in predicting gestational age due to limitations with the presently used methods. We used data from the Norwegian Mother and Child Birth Cohort study (MoBa) with Illumina HumanMethylation450 data measured for 1753 newborns in two batches: MoBa 1, n = 1068; and MoBa 2, n = 685. Gestational age was computed using both ultrasound and the last menstrual period. We evaluated associations between DNA methylation and gestational age and developed a statistical model for predicting gestational age using MoBa 1 for training and MoBa 2 for predictions. The prediction model was additionally used to compare ultrasound and last menstrual period-based gestational age predictions. Furthermore, both CpGs and associated genes detected in the training models were compared to those detected in a published prediction model for chronological age. RESULTS: There were 5474 CpGs associated with ultrasound gestational age after adjustment for a set of covariates, including estimated cell type proportions, and Bonferroni-correction for multiple testing. Our model predicted ultrasound gestational age more accurately than it predicted last menstrual period gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: DNA methylation at birth appears to be a good predictor of gestational age. Ultrasound gestational age is more strongly associated with methylation than last menstrual period gestational age. The CpGs linked with our gestational age prediction model, and their associated genes, differed substantially from the corresponding CpGs and genes associated with a chronological age prediction model. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1063-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5054559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50545592016-10-19 Prediction of gestational age based on genome-wide differentially methylated regions Bohlin, J. Håberg, S. E. Magnus, P. Reese, S. E. Gjessing, H. K. Magnus, M. C. Parr, C. L. Page, C. M. London, S. J. Nystad, W. Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: We explored the association between gestational age and cord blood DNA methylation at birth and whether DNA methylation could be effective in predicting gestational age due to limitations with the presently used methods. We used data from the Norwegian Mother and Child Birth Cohort study (MoBa) with Illumina HumanMethylation450 data measured for 1753 newborns in two batches: MoBa 1, n = 1068; and MoBa 2, n = 685. Gestational age was computed using both ultrasound and the last menstrual period. We evaluated associations between DNA methylation and gestational age and developed a statistical model for predicting gestational age using MoBa 1 for training and MoBa 2 for predictions. The prediction model was additionally used to compare ultrasound and last menstrual period-based gestational age predictions. Furthermore, both CpGs and associated genes detected in the training models were compared to those detected in a published prediction model for chronological age. RESULTS: There were 5474 CpGs associated with ultrasound gestational age after adjustment for a set of covariates, including estimated cell type proportions, and Bonferroni-correction for multiple testing. Our model predicted ultrasound gestational age more accurately than it predicted last menstrual period gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: DNA methylation at birth appears to be a good predictor of gestational age. Ultrasound gestational age is more strongly associated with methylation than last menstrual period gestational age. The CpGs linked with our gestational age prediction model, and their associated genes, differed substantially from the corresponding CpGs and genes associated with a chronological age prediction model. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1063-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5054559/ /pubmed/27717397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1063-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Bohlin, J. Håberg, S. E. Magnus, P. Reese, S. E. Gjessing, H. K. Magnus, M. C. Parr, C. L. Page, C. M. London, S. J. Nystad, W. Prediction of gestational age based on genome-wide differentially methylated regions |
title | Prediction of gestational age based on genome-wide differentially methylated regions |
title_full | Prediction of gestational age based on genome-wide differentially methylated regions |
title_fullStr | Prediction of gestational age based on genome-wide differentially methylated regions |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of gestational age based on genome-wide differentially methylated regions |
title_short | Prediction of gestational age based on genome-wide differentially methylated regions |
title_sort | prediction of gestational age based on genome-wide differentially methylated regions |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27717397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1063-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bohlinj predictionofgestationalagebasedongenomewidedifferentiallymethylatedregions AT habergse predictionofgestationalagebasedongenomewidedifferentiallymethylatedregions AT magnusp predictionofgestationalagebasedongenomewidedifferentiallymethylatedregions AT reesese predictionofgestationalagebasedongenomewidedifferentiallymethylatedregions AT gjessinghk predictionofgestationalagebasedongenomewidedifferentiallymethylatedregions AT magnusmc predictionofgestationalagebasedongenomewidedifferentiallymethylatedregions AT parrcl predictionofgestationalagebasedongenomewidedifferentiallymethylatedregions AT pagecm predictionofgestationalagebasedongenomewidedifferentiallymethylatedregions AT londonsj predictionofgestationalagebasedongenomewidedifferentiallymethylatedregions AT nystadw predictionofgestationalagebasedongenomewidedifferentiallymethylatedregions |