Cargando…

A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure

BACKGROUND: The Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable (LTS-D) and the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway (SLMA) are second generation supraglottic airway devices (SADs) with an added channel to allow gastric drainage. We studied the efficacy of these devices when using pressure controlled mechanical ventilat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Somri, Mostafa, Vaida, Sonia, Fornari, Gustavo Garcia, Mendoza, Gabriela Renee, Charco-Mora, Pedro, Hawash, Naser, Matter, Ibrahim, Swaid, Forat, Gaitini, Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0237-7
_version_ 1782458634399121408
author Somri, Mostafa
Vaida, Sonia
Fornari, Gustavo Garcia
Mendoza, Gabriela Renee
Charco-Mora, Pedro
Hawash, Naser
Matter, Ibrahim
Swaid, Forat
Gaitini, Luis
author_facet Somri, Mostafa
Vaida, Sonia
Fornari, Gustavo Garcia
Mendoza, Gabriela Renee
Charco-Mora, Pedro
Hawash, Naser
Matter, Ibrahim
Swaid, Forat
Gaitini, Luis
author_sort Somri, Mostafa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable (LTS-D) and the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway (SLMA) are second generation supraglottic airway devices (SADs) with an added channel to allow gastric drainage. We studied the efficacy of these devices when using pressure controlled mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia for short and medium duration surgical procedures and compared the oropharyngeal seal pressure in different head and-neck positions. METHODS: Eighty patients in each group had either LTS-D or SLMA for airway management. The patients were recruited in two different institutions. Primary outcome variables were the oropharyngeal seal pressures in neutral, flexion, extension, right and left head-neck position. Secondary outcome variables were time to achieve an effective airway, ease of insertion, number of attempts, maneuvers necessary during insertion, ventilatory parameters, success of gastric tube insertion and incidence of complications. RESULTS: The oropharyngeal seal pressure achieved with the LTS-D was higher than the SLMA in, (extension (p=0.0150) and right position (p=0.0268 at 60 cm H(2)O intracuff pressures and nearly significant in neutral position (p = 0.0571). The oropharyngeal seal pressure was significantly higher with the LTS-D during neck extension as compared to SLMA (p= 0.015). Similar oropharyngeal seal pressures were detected in all other positions with each device. The secondary outcomes were comparable between both groups. Patients ventilated with LTS-D had higher incidence of sore throat (p = 0.527). No major complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Better oropharyngeal seal pressure was achieved with the LTS-D in head-neck right and extension positions , although it did not appear to have significance in alteration of management using pressure control mechanical ventilation in neutral position. The fiberoptic view was better with the SLMA. The post-operative sore throat incidence was higher in the LTS-D. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02856672, Unique Protocol ID:BnaiZionMC-16-LG-001, Registered: August 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5054611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50546112016-10-19 A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure Somri, Mostafa Vaida, Sonia Fornari, Gustavo Garcia Mendoza, Gabriela Renee Charco-Mora, Pedro Hawash, Naser Matter, Ibrahim Swaid, Forat Gaitini, Luis BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable (LTS-D) and the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway (SLMA) are second generation supraglottic airway devices (SADs) with an added channel to allow gastric drainage. We studied the efficacy of these devices when using pressure controlled mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia for short and medium duration surgical procedures and compared the oropharyngeal seal pressure in different head and-neck positions. METHODS: Eighty patients in each group had either LTS-D or SLMA for airway management. The patients were recruited in two different institutions. Primary outcome variables were the oropharyngeal seal pressures in neutral, flexion, extension, right and left head-neck position. Secondary outcome variables were time to achieve an effective airway, ease of insertion, number of attempts, maneuvers necessary during insertion, ventilatory parameters, success of gastric tube insertion and incidence of complications. RESULTS: The oropharyngeal seal pressure achieved with the LTS-D was higher than the SLMA in, (extension (p=0.0150) and right position (p=0.0268 at 60 cm H(2)O intracuff pressures and nearly significant in neutral position (p = 0.0571). The oropharyngeal seal pressure was significantly higher with the LTS-D during neck extension as compared to SLMA (p= 0.015). Similar oropharyngeal seal pressures were detected in all other positions with each device. The secondary outcomes were comparable between both groups. Patients ventilated with LTS-D had higher incidence of sore throat (p = 0.527). No major complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Better oropharyngeal seal pressure was achieved with the LTS-D in head-neck right and extension positions , although it did not appear to have significance in alteration of management using pressure control mechanical ventilation in neutral position. The fiberoptic view was better with the SLMA. The post-operative sore throat incidence was higher in the LTS-D. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02856672, Unique Protocol ID:BnaiZionMC-16-LG-001, Registered: August 2016. BioMed Central 2016-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5054611/ /pubmed/27716165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0237-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Somri, Mostafa
Vaida, Sonia
Fornari, Gustavo Garcia
Mendoza, Gabriela Renee
Charco-Mora, Pedro
Hawash, Naser
Matter, Ibrahim
Swaid, Forat
Gaitini, Luis
A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure
title A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure
title_full A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure
title_fullStr A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure
title_full_unstemmed A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure
title_short A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure
title_sort randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0237-7
work_keys_str_mv AT somrimostafa arandomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT vaidasonia arandomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT fornarigustavogarcia arandomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT mendozagabrielarenee arandomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT charcomorapedro arandomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT hawashnaser arandomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT matteribrahim arandomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT swaidforat arandomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT gaitiniluis arandomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT somrimostafa randomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT vaidasonia randomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT fornarigustavogarcia randomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT mendozagabrielarenee randomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT charcomorapedro randomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT hawashnaser randomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT matteribrahim randomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT swaidforat randomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure
AT gaitiniluis randomizedprospectivecontrolledtrialcomparingthelaryngealtubesuctiondisposableandthesupremelaryngealmaskairwaytheinfluenceofheadandneckpositiononoropharyngealsealpressure