Cargando…
Commentary on: Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis by Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge SN, et al. NEJM 2016;374 (15):1424-34
BACKGROUND: How does an article involving only 66 patients randomized into two spinal surgical groups get into the New England Journal of Medicine? Nevertheless, this one did. The article by Ghogawala et al. entitled Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis, comp...
Autor principal: | Epstein, Nancy E. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27843677 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.191061 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Lower complication and reoperation rates for laminectomy rather than MI TLIF/other fusions for degenerative lumbar disease/spondylolisthesis: A review
por: Epstein, Nancy E.
Publicado: (2018) -
Is posterior fusion necessary with laminectomy in the cervical spine?
por: McAllister, Beck D., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Tisseel does not reduce postoperative drainage, length of stay, and transfusion requirements for lumbar laminectomy with noninstrumented fusion versus laminectomy alone
por: Epstein, Nancy E.
Publicado: (2015) -
Lumbar laminectomy in a captive, adult polar bear (Ursus maritimus)
por: Morrison, John F., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Tisseel's impact on hemostasis for 2–3 and 4–6-level lumbar laminectomies
por: Epstein, Nancy E.
Publicado: (2017)