Cargando…
CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis
Introduction: The shoulder arthroplasty brings satisfaction to patients in terms of quality of life and indolence. However whether anatomic implant or reverse, it does not escape from the loosening of the glenoid component. Moreover, optimal implantation is required to ensure the functional outcome...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
EDP Sciences
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2016021 |
_version_ | 1782458658164047872 |
---|---|
author | Obert, Laurent Peyron, Christelle Boyer, Etienne Menu, Gauthier Loisel, François Aubry, Sébastien |
author_facet | Obert, Laurent Peyron, Christelle Boyer, Etienne Menu, Gauthier Loisel, François Aubry, Sébastien |
author_sort | Obert, Laurent |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: The shoulder arthroplasty brings satisfaction to patients in terms of quality of life and indolence. However whether anatomic implant or reverse, it does not escape from the loosening of the glenoid component. Moreover, optimal implantation is required to ensure the functional outcome without shortening of the arm. The purpose of this study is obtain CT scan evaluation of the glenoid bone stock in order to optimize glenoid component implantation and obtain a reference to determine optimal humeral component placement in case of humeral proximal fracture. Materials and methods: Between 2010 and 2011 we have analyzed 200 intact shoulder’s CT. We measured maximal and minimal width in the transverse plane of the glenoid, the distance from the pectoralis major (PM) tendon to the humeral head, the greater tubercle, change of curvature and the anatomical neck. Results: Mean maximum width was 27.4 ± 3.4 mm and mean minimum width was 15.5 ± 2.8 mm. Distances between upper edge of PM tendon to: humeral head, greater tubercle, change of curvature and anatomical neck were respectively: 67.6 ± 9.98 mm, 57.8 ± 10.3 mm, 28.7 ± 9 mm, and 34.2 ± 9.7 mm. Conclusion: Our study has produced an assessment of glenoid bone stock for optimal positioning of the glenoid implant but also to obtain a reference to determine the ideal location of the humeral component in the case of proximal humerus fracture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5054739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | EDP Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50547392016-10-12 CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis Obert, Laurent Peyron, Christelle Boyer, Etienne Menu, Gauthier Loisel, François Aubry, Sébastien SICOT J Research Introduction: The shoulder arthroplasty brings satisfaction to patients in terms of quality of life and indolence. However whether anatomic implant or reverse, it does not escape from the loosening of the glenoid component. Moreover, optimal implantation is required to ensure the functional outcome without shortening of the arm. The purpose of this study is obtain CT scan evaluation of the glenoid bone stock in order to optimize glenoid component implantation and obtain a reference to determine optimal humeral component placement in case of humeral proximal fracture. Materials and methods: Between 2010 and 2011 we have analyzed 200 intact shoulder’s CT. We measured maximal and minimal width in the transverse plane of the glenoid, the distance from the pectoralis major (PM) tendon to the humeral head, the greater tubercle, change of curvature and the anatomical neck. Results: Mean maximum width was 27.4 ± 3.4 mm and mean minimum width was 15.5 ± 2.8 mm. Distances between upper edge of PM tendon to: humeral head, greater tubercle, change of curvature and anatomical neck were respectively: 67.6 ± 9.98 mm, 57.8 ± 10.3 mm, 28.7 ± 9 mm, and 34.2 ± 9.7 mm. Conclusion: Our study has produced an assessment of glenoid bone stock for optimal positioning of the glenoid implant but also to obtain a reference to determine the ideal location of the humeral component in the case of proximal humerus fracture. EDP Sciences 2016-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5054739/ /pubmed/27716461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2016021 Text en © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2016 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Obert, Laurent Peyron, Christelle Boyer, Etienne Menu, Gauthier Loisel, François Aubry, Sébastien CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis |
title | CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis |
title_full | CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis |
title_fullStr | CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis |
title_short | CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis |
title_sort | ct scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2016021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT obertlaurent ctscanevaluationofglenoidboneandpectoralismajortendoninterestinshoulderprosthesis AT peyronchristelle ctscanevaluationofglenoidboneandpectoralismajortendoninterestinshoulderprosthesis AT boyeretienne ctscanevaluationofglenoidboneandpectoralismajortendoninterestinshoulderprosthesis AT menugauthier ctscanevaluationofglenoidboneandpectoralismajortendoninterestinshoulderprosthesis AT loiselfrancois ctscanevaluationofglenoidboneandpectoralismajortendoninterestinshoulderprosthesis AT aubrysebastien ctscanevaluationofglenoidboneandpectoralismajortendoninterestinshoulderprosthesis |