Cargando…

CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis

Introduction: The shoulder arthroplasty brings satisfaction to patients in terms of quality of life and indolence. However whether anatomic implant or reverse, it does not escape from the loosening of the glenoid component. Moreover, optimal implantation is required to ensure the functional outcome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obert, Laurent, Peyron, Christelle, Boyer, Etienne, Menu, Gauthier, Loisel, François, Aubry, Sébastien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: EDP Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2016021
_version_ 1782458658164047872
author Obert, Laurent
Peyron, Christelle
Boyer, Etienne
Menu, Gauthier
Loisel, François
Aubry, Sébastien
author_facet Obert, Laurent
Peyron, Christelle
Boyer, Etienne
Menu, Gauthier
Loisel, François
Aubry, Sébastien
author_sort Obert, Laurent
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The shoulder arthroplasty brings satisfaction to patients in terms of quality of life and indolence. However whether anatomic implant or reverse, it does not escape from the loosening of the glenoid component. Moreover, optimal implantation is required to ensure the functional outcome without shortening of the arm. The purpose of this study is obtain CT scan evaluation of the glenoid bone stock in order to optimize glenoid component implantation and obtain a reference to determine optimal humeral component placement in case of humeral proximal fracture. Materials and methods: Between 2010 and 2011 we have analyzed 200 intact shoulder’s CT. We measured maximal and minimal width in the transverse plane of the glenoid, the distance from the pectoralis major (PM) tendon to the humeral head, the greater tubercle, change of curvature and the anatomical neck. Results: Mean maximum width was 27.4 ± 3.4 mm and mean minimum width was 15.5 ± 2.8 mm. Distances between upper edge of PM tendon to: humeral head, greater tubercle, change of curvature and anatomical neck were respectively: 67.6 ± 9.98 mm, 57.8 ± 10.3 mm, 28.7 ± 9 mm, and 34.2 ± 9.7 mm. Conclusion: Our study has produced an assessment of glenoid bone stock for optimal positioning of the glenoid implant but also to obtain a reference to determine the ideal location of the humeral component in the case of proximal humerus fracture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5054739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50547392016-10-12 CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis Obert, Laurent Peyron, Christelle Boyer, Etienne Menu, Gauthier Loisel, François Aubry, Sébastien SICOT J Research Introduction: The shoulder arthroplasty brings satisfaction to patients in terms of quality of life and indolence. However whether anatomic implant or reverse, it does not escape from the loosening of the glenoid component. Moreover, optimal implantation is required to ensure the functional outcome without shortening of the arm. The purpose of this study is obtain CT scan evaluation of the glenoid bone stock in order to optimize glenoid component implantation and obtain a reference to determine optimal humeral component placement in case of humeral proximal fracture. Materials and methods: Between 2010 and 2011 we have analyzed 200 intact shoulder’s CT. We measured maximal and minimal width in the transverse plane of the glenoid, the distance from the pectoralis major (PM) tendon to the humeral head, the greater tubercle, change of curvature and the anatomical neck. Results: Mean maximum width was 27.4 ± 3.4 mm and mean minimum width was 15.5 ± 2.8 mm. Distances between upper edge of PM tendon to: humeral head, greater tubercle, change of curvature and anatomical neck were respectively: 67.6 ± 9.98 mm, 57.8 ± 10.3 mm, 28.7 ± 9 mm, and 34.2 ± 9.7 mm. Conclusion: Our study has produced an assessment of glenoid bone stock for optimal positioning of the glenoid implant but also to obtain a reference to determine the ideal location of the humeral component in the case of proximal humerus fracture. EDP Sciences 2016-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5054739/ /pubmed/27716461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2016021 Text en © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2016 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Obert, Laurent
Peyron, Christelle
Boyer, Etienne
Menu, Gauthier
Loisel, François
Aubry, Sébastien
CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis
title CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis
title_full CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis
title_fullStr CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis
title_short CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis
title_sort ct scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2016021
work_keys_str_mv AT obertlaurent ctscanevaluationofglenoidboneandpectoralismajortendoninterestinshoulderprosthesis
AT peyronchristelle ctscanevaluationofglenoidboneandpectoralismajortendoninterestinshoulderprosthesis
AT boyeretienne ctscanevaluationofglenoidboneandpectoralismajortendoninterestinshoulderprosthesis
AT menugauthier ctscanevaluationofglenoidboneandpectoralismajortendoninterestinshoulderprosthesis
AT loiselfrancois ctscanevaluationofglenoidboneandpectoralismajortendoninterestinshoulderprosthesis
AT aubrysebastien ctscanevaluationofglenoidboneandpectoralismajortendoninterestinshoulderprosthesis