Cargando…

Effects of an antenatal dietary intervention on maternal anthropometric measures in pregnant women with obesity

OBJECTIVE: The effect of providing antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice on secondary measures of maternal anthropometry was evaluated and their correlation with both gestational weight gain and infant birth weight was assessed. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized controlled trial, pregnant women...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dodd, Jodie M., Kannieappan, Lavern M., Grivell, Rosalie M., Deussen, Andrea R., Moran, Lisa J., Yelland, Lisa N., Owens, Julie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26175260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.21145
_version_ 1782458672588259328
author Dodd, Jodie M.
Kannieappan, Lavern M.
Grivell, Rosalie M.
Deussen, Andrea R.
Moran, Lisa J.
Yelland, Lisa N.
Owens, Julie A.
author_facet Dodd, Jodie M.
Kannieappan, Lavern M.
Grivell, Rosalie M.
Deussen, Andrea R.
Moran, Lisa J.
Yelland, Lisa N.
Owens, Julie A.
author_sort Dodd, Jodie M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The effect of providing antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice on secondary measures of maternal anthropometry was evaluated and their correlation with both gestational weight gain and infant birth weight was assessed. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized controlled trial, pregnant women with BMI of ≥25 kg/m(2) received either Lifestyle Advice or Standard Care. Maternal anthropometric outcomes included arm circumference, biceps, triceps, and subscapular skinfold thickness measurements (SFTM), percentage body fat (BF), gestational weight gain, and infant birth weight. The intention to treat principles were utilized by the analyses. RESULTS: The measurements were obtained from 807 (74.7%) women in the Lifestyle Advice Group and 775 (72.3%) women in the Standard Care Group. There were no statistically significant differences identified between the treatment groups with regards to arm circumference, biceps, triceps, and subscapular SFTM, or percentage BF at 36‐week gestation. Maternal anthropometric measurements were not significantly correlated with either gestational weight gain or infant birth weight. CONCLUSIONS: Among pregnant women with a BMI of ≥25 kg/m(2), maternal SFTM were not modified by an antenatal dietary and lifestyle intervention. Furthermore, maternal SFTM correlate poorly with both gestational weight gain and infant birth weight.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5054850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50548502016-10-19 Effects of an antenatal dietary intervention on maternal anthropometric measures in pregnant women with obesity Dodd, Jodie M. Kannieappan, Lavern M. Grivell, Rosalie M. Deussen, Andrea R. Moran, Lisa J. Yelland, Lisa N. Owens, Julie A. Obesity (Silver Spring) Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The effect of providing antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice on secondary measures of maternal anthropometry was evaluated and their correlation with both gestational weight gain and infant birth weight was assessed. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized controlled trial, pregnant women with BMI of ≥25 kg/m(2) received either Lifestyle Advice or Standard Care. Maternal anthropometric outcomes included arm circumference, biceps, triceps, and subscapular skinfold thickness measurements (SFTM), percentage body fat (BF), gestational weight gain, and infant birth weight. The intention to treat principles were utilized by the analyses. RESULTS: The measurements were obtained from 807 (74.7%) women in the Lifestyle Advice Group and 775 (72.3%) women in the Standard Care Group. There were no statistically significant differences identified between the treatment groups with regards to arm circumference, biceps, triceps, and subscapular SFTM, or percentage BF at 36‐week gestation. Maternal anthropometric measurements were not significantly correlated with either gestational weight gain or infant birth weight. CONCLUSIONS: Among pregnant women with a BMI of ≥25 kg/m(2), maternal SFTM were not modified by an antenatal dietary and lifestyle intervention. Furthermore, maternal SFTM correlate poorly with both gestational weight gain and infant birth weight. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-08 2015-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5054850/ /pubmed/26175260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.21145 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Obesity published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Obesity Society (TOS) This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Dodd, Jodie M.
Kannieappan, Lavern M.
Grivell, Rosalie M.
Deussen, Andrea R.
Moran, Lisa J.
Yelland, Lisa N.
Owens, Julie A.
Effects of an antenatal dietary intervention on maternal anthropometric measures in pregnant women with obesity
title Effects of an antenatal dietary intervention on maternal anthropometric measures in pregnant women with obesity
title_full Effects of an antenatal dietary intervention on maternal anthropometric measures in pregnant women with obesity
title_fullStr Effects of an antenatal dietary intervention on maternal anthropometric measures in pregnant women with obesity
title_full_unstemmed Effects of an antenatal dietary intervention on maternal anthropometric measures in pregnant women with obesity
title_short Effects of an antenatal dietary intervention on maternal anthropometric measures in pregnant women with obesity
title_sort effects of an antenatal dietary intervention on maternal anthropometric measures in pregnant women with obesity
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26175260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.21145
work_keys_str_mv AT doddjodiem effectsofanantenataldietaryinterventiononmaternalanthropometricmeasuresinpregnantwomenwithobesity
AT kannieappanlavernm effectsofanantenataldietaryinterventiononmaternalanthropometricmeasuresinpregnantwomenwithobesity
AT grivellrosaliem effectsofanantenataldietaryinterventiononmaternalanthropometricmeasuresinpregnantwomenwithobesity
AT deussenandrear effectsofanantenataldietaryinterventiononmaternalanthropometricmeasuresinpregnantwomenwithobesity
AT moranlisaj effectsofanantenataldietaryinterventiononmaternalanthropometricmeasuresinpregnantwomenwithobesity
AT yellandlisan effectsofanantenataldietaryinterventiononmaternalanthropometricmeasuresinpregnantwomenwithobesity
AT owensjuliea effectsofanantenataldietaryinterventiononmaternalanthropometricmeasuresinpregnantwomenwithobesity