Cargando…
The physical foundation of F (N) = kh (3/2) for conical/pyramidal indentation loading curves
A physical deduction of the F (N) = kh (3/2) relation (where F (N) is normal force, k penetration resistance, and h penetration depth) for conical/pyramidal indentation loading curves has been achieved on the basis of elementary mathematics. The indentation process couples the productions of volume...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25980807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sca.21223 |
_version_ | 1782458686197727232 |
---|---|
author | Kaupp, G. |
author_facet | Kaupp, G. |
author_sort | Kaupp, G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A physical deduction of the F (N) = kh (3/2) relation (where F (N) is normal force, k penetration resistance, and h penetration depth) for conical/pyramidal indentation loading curves has been achieved on the basis of elementary mathematics. The indentation process couples the productions of volume and pressure to the displaced material that often partly plasticizes due to such pressure. As the pressure/plasticizing depends on the indenter volume, it follows that F (N )= F (Np) (1/3) · F (NV) (2/3), where the index p stands for pressure/plasticizing and V for indentation volume. F (Np) does not contribute to the penetration, only F (NV). The exponent 2/3 on F (NV) shows that while F (N) is experimentally applied; only F (N) (2/3) is responsible for the penetration depth h. Thus, F (N )= kh (3/2) is deduced and the physical reason is the loss of F (N) (1/3) for the depth. Unfortunately, this has not been considered in teaching, textbooks, and the previous deduction of numerous common mechanical parameters, when the Love/Sneddon deductions of an exponent 2 on h were accepted and applied. The various unexpected experimental verifications and applications of the correct exponent 3/2 are mentioned and cited. Undue mechanical parameters require correction not only for safety reasons. SCANNING 38:177–179, 2016. © 2015 The Authors. Scanning published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5054916 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50549162016-10-19 The physical foundation of F (N) = kh (3/2) for conical/pyramidal indentation loading curves Kaupp, G. Scanning Original Articles A physical deduction of the F (N) = kh (3/2) relation (where F (N) is normal force, k penetration resistance, and h penetration depth) for conical/pyramidal indentation loading curves has been achieved on the basis of elementary mathematics. The indentation process couples the productions of volume and pressure to the displaced material that often partly plasticizes due to such pressure. As the pressure/plasticizing depends on the indenter volume, it follows that F (N )= F (Np) (1/3) · F (NV) (2/3), where the index p stands for pressure/plasticizing and V for indentation volume. F (Np) does not contribute to the penetration, only F (NV). The exponent 2/3 on F (NV) shows that while F (N) is experimentally applied; only F (N) (2/3) is responsible for the penetration depth h. Thus, F (N )= kh (3/2) is deduced and the physical reason is the loss of F (N) (1/3) for the depth. Unfortunately, this has not been considered in teaching, textbooks, and the previous deduction of numerous common mechanical parameters, when the Love/Sneddon deductions of an exponent 2 on h were accepted and applied. The various unexpected experimental verifications and applications of the correct exponent 3/2 are mentioned and cited. Undue mechanical parameters require correction not only for safety reasons. SCANNING 38:177–179, 2016. © 2015 The Authors. Scanning published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-05-15 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5054916/ /pubmed/25980807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sca.21223 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Scanning published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kaupp, G. The physical foundation of F (N) = kh (3/2) for conical/pyramidal indentation loading curves |
title | The physical foundation of F
(N) = kh
(3/2) for conical/pyramidal indentation loading curves |
title_full | The physical foundation of F
(N) = kh
(3/2) for conical/pyramidal indentation loading curves |
title_fullStr | The physical foundation of F
(N) = kh
(3/2) for conical/pyramidal indentation loading curves |
title_full_unstemmed | The physical foundation of F
(N) = kh
(3/2) for conical/pyramidal indentation loading curves |
title_short | The physical foundation of F
(N) = kh
(3/2) for conical/pyramidal indentation loading curves |
title_sort | physical foundation of f
(n) = kh
(3/2) for conical/pyramidal indentation loading curves |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25980807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sca.21223 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kauppg thephysicalfoundationoffnkh32forconicalpyramidalindentationloadingcurves AT kauppg physicalfoundationoffnkh32forconicalpyramidalindentationloadingcurves |