Cargando…
Impact of Certolizumab Pegol on Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis
OBJECTIVE: Patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) provide an opportunity to collect important information relating to patient well‐being, which is often difficult for physicians to measure (e.g., quality of life, pain, fatigue, and sleep). Here we evaluate the effects of certolizumab pegol (CZP) on PROs d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25832312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.22594 |
_version_ | 1782458689448312832 |
---|---|
author | Sieper, J. Kivitz, A. van Tubergen, A. Deodhar, A. Coteur, G. Woltering, F. Landewé, R. |
author_facet | Sieper, J. Kivitz, A. van Tubergen, A. Deodhar, A. Coteur, G. Woltering, F. Landewé, R. |
author_sort | Sieper, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) provide an opportunity to collect important information relating to patient well‐being, which is often difficult for physicians to measure (e.g., quality of life, pain, fatigue, and sleep). Here we evaluate the effects of certolizumab pegol (CZP) on PROs during the 24‐week, double‐blind phase of the RAPID axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) trial, a phase 3 trial of axial SpA patients, including both ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and nonradiographic axial SpA patients. METHODS: A total of 325 patients with active axial SpA were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks, or CZP 400 mg every 4 weeks. The primary end point was the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria for 20% improvement in disease activity response at week 12, and has been reported previously. PROs included total back pain, nocturnal back pain, a daily pain diary, the Sleep Problems Index II (SPI) domain of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale, fatigue, the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQOL) measure, and the Short Form 36‐item (SF‐36) health survey physical component summary (PCS), mental component summary (MCS), and domains. RESULTS: Patients treated with CZP reported significant improvements from week 1 for nocturnal back pain (placebo −0.6, CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks −1.9, and CZP 400 mg every 4 weeks −1.6; P < 0.001) and ASQOL (placebo −1.0, CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks −2.3, and CZP 400 mg every 4 weeks −1.9; P < 0.05) compared with placebo, while significant improvements in total back pain were seen from day 2. Patients treated with both CZP dosing regimens also had significantly greater improvements in fatigue, MOS‐SPI, SF‐36 PCS, MCS, and domains compared with placebo. Improvements were similar in both AS and nonradiographic axial SpA patients. CONCLUSION: Both CZP dosing schedules rapidly improved patient well‐being, as measured by PROs, including pain, fatigue, sleep, SF‐36, and ASQOL in both AS and nonradiographic axial SpA patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5054930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50549302016-10-19 Impact of Certolizumab Pegol on Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis Sieper, J. Kivitz, A. van Tubergen, A. Deodhar, A. Coteur, G. Woltering, F. Landewé, R. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Brief Reports OBJECTIVE: Patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) provide an opportunity to collect important information relating to patient well‐being, which is often difficult for physicians to measure (e.g., quality of life, pain, fatigue, and sleep). Here we evaluate the effects of certolizumab pegol (CZP) on PROs during the 24‐week, double‐blind phase of the RAPID axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) trial, a phase 3 trial of axial SpA patients, including both ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and nonradiographic axial SpA patients. METHODS: A total of 325 patients with active axial SpA were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks, or CZP 400 mg every 4 weeks. The primary end point was the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria for 20% improvement in disease activity response at week 12, and has been reported previously. PROs included total back pain, nocturnal back pain, a daily pain diary, the Sleep Problems Index II (SPI) domain of the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale, fatigue, the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQOL) measure, and the Short Form 36‐item (SF‐36) health survey physical component summary (PCS), mental component summary (MCS), and domains. RESULTS: Patients treated with CZP reported significant improvements from week 1 for nocturnal back pain (placebo −0.6, CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks −1.9, and CZP 400 mg every 4 weeks −1.6; P < 0.001) and ASQOL (placebo −1.0, CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks −2.3, and CZP 400 mg every 4 weeks −1.9; P < 0.05) compared with placebo, while significant improvements in total back pain were seen from day 2. Patients treated with both CZP dosing regimens also had significantly greater improvements in fatigue, MOS‐SPI, SF‐36 PCS, MCS, and domains compared with placebo. Improvements were similar in both AS and nonradiographic axial SpA patients. CONCLUSION: Both CZP dosing schedules rapidly improved patient well‐being, as measured by PROs, including pain, fatigue, sleep, SF‐36, and ASQOL in both AS and nonradiographic axial SpA patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-09-22 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5054930/ /pubmed/25832312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.22594 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Arthritis Care & Research is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Rheumatology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Brief Reports Sieper, J. Kivitz, A. van Tubergen, A. Deodhar, A. Coteur, G. Woltering, F. Landewé, R. Impact of Certolizumab Pegol on Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis |
title | Impact of Certolizumab Pegol on Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis |
title_full | Impact of Certolizumab Pegol on Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis |
title_fullStr | Impact of Certolizumab Pegol on Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Certolizumab Pegol on Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis |
title_short | Impact of Certolizumab Pegol on Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis |
title_sort | impact of certolizumab pegol on patient‐reported outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis |
topic | Brief Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25832312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.22594 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sieperj impactofcertolizumabpegolonpatientreportedoutcomesinpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritis AT kivitza impactofcertolizumabpegolonpatientreportedoutcomesinpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritis AT vantubergena impactofcertolizumabpegolonpatientreportedoutcomesinpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritis AT deodhara impactofcertolizumabpegolonpatientreportedoutcomesinpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritis AT coteurg impactofcertolizumabpegolonpatientreportedoutcomesinpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritis AT wolteringf impactofcertolizumabpegolonpatientreportedoutcomesinpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritis AT landewer impactofcertolizumabpegolonpatientreportedoutcomesinpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritis |