Cargando…
The Economics of Skin Cancer: An Analysis of Medicare Payment Data
The incidence and cost of nonmelanoma skin cancers are skyrocketing. Five million cases cost $8.1 billion in 2011. The average cost of treatment per patient increased from $1000 in 2006 to $1600 in 2011. We present a study of the economics and costs of skin cancer management in Medicare patients. ME...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27757333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000826 |
_version_ | 1782458704181854208 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Jenny T. Kempton, Steven J. Rao, Venkat K. |
author_facet | Chen, Jenny T. Kempton, Steven J. Rao, Venkat K. |
author_sort | Chen, Jenny T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The incidence and cost of nonmelanoma skin cancers are skyrocketing. Five million cases cost $8.1 billion in 2011. The average cost of treatment per patient increased from $1000 in 2006 to $1600 in 2011. We present a study of the economics and costs of skin cancer management in Medicare patients. METHODS: We studied data released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in 2014. Treatment modalities for the management of skin cancer were reviewed, and costs of treatment were quantified for a sample of 880,000 providers. RESULTS: Review of Medicare payment records related to the management of skin cancer yielded data from over 880,000 health care providers who received $77 billion in Medicare payments in 2012. From 1992 to 2009, the rate of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has increased by 700%, and these procedures typically have Medicare payments 120% to 370% more than surgical excision, even when including pathology fees. From 1992 to 2009, MMS increased by 700%, whereas surgical excisions increased by only 20%. In 2009, 1800 providers billed Medicare for MMS; in 2012, that number increased to 3209. On average, 1 in 4 cases of skin cancer is treated with MMS. CONCLUSION: Mohs excision is more expensive than surgical excision in an office setting. Procedures requiring the operating room are much more expensive than office procedures. In an era of high deductible health plans, patients’ financial burden is much less with simple excisions of skin cancers done in a clinic when compared with Mohs surgery or operative interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5054999 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50549992016-10-18 The Economics of Skin Cancer: An Analysis of Medicare Payment Data Chen, Jenny T. Kempton, Steven J. Rao, Venkat K. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Special Topic The incidence and cost of nonmelanoma skin cancers are skyrocketing. Five million cases cost $8.1 billion in 2011. The average cost of treatment per patient increased from $1000 in 2006 to $1600 in 2011. We present a study of the economics and costs of skin cancer management in Medicare patients. METHODS: We studied data released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in 2014. Treatment modalities for the management of skin cancer were reviewed, and costs of treatment were quantified for a sample of 880,000 providers. RESULTS: Review of Medicare payment records related to the management of skin cancer yielded data from over 880,000 health care providers who received $77 billion in Medicare payments in 2012. From 1992 to 2009, the rate of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has increased by 700%, and these procedures typically have Medicare payments 120% to 370% more than surgical excision, even when including pathology fees. From 1992 to 2009, MMS increased by 700%, whereas surgical excisions increased by only 20%. In 2009, 1800 providers billed Medicare for MMS; in 2012, that number increased to 3209. On average, 1 in 4 cases of skin cancer is treated with MMS. CONCLUSION: Mohs excision is more expensive than surgical excision in an office setting. Procedures requiring the operating room are much more expensive than office procedures. In an era of high deductible health plans, patients’ financial burden is much less with simple excisions of skin cancers done in a clinic when compared with Mohs surgery or operative interventions. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5054999/ /pubmed/27757333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000826 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Special Topic Chen, Jenny T. Kempton, Steven J. Rao, Venkat K. The Economics of Skin Cancer: An Analysis of Medicare Payment Data |
title | The Economics of Skin Cancer: An Analysis of Medicare Payment Data |
title_full | The Economics of Skin Cancer: An Analysis of Medicare Payment Data |
title_fullStr | The Economics of Skin Cancer: An Analysis of Medicare Payment Data |
title_full_unstemmed | The Economics of Skin Cancer: An Analysis of Medicare Payment Data |
title_short | The Economics of Skin Cancer: An Analysis of Medicare Payment Data |
title_sort | economics of skin cancer: an analysis of medicare payment data |
topic | Special Topic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5054999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27757333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000826 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenjennyt theeconomicsofskincancerananalysisofmedicarepaymentdata AT kemptonstevenj theeconomicsofskincancerananalysisofmedicarepaymentdata AT raovenkatk theeconomicsofskincancerananalysisofmedicarepaymentdata AT chenjennyt economicsofskincancerananalysisofmedicarepaymentdata AT kemptonstevenj economicsofskincancerananalysisofmedicarepaymentdata AT raovenkatk economicsofskincancerananalysisofmedicarepaymentdata |