Cargando…
A comparison of outcomes of bariatric surgery in patient greater than 70 with 18 month of follow up
BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of data available to determine the safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery in the elderly population. Additionally, there are no studies showing the effect of the single anastomosis duodenal switch (SADS) has on the elderly obese, in comparison with other more p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5055526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27795883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3392-x |
_version_ | 1782458773924741120 |
---|---|
author | Zaveri, Hinali Surve, Amit Cottam, Daniel Summerhays, Christina Cottam, Austin Richards, Christina Belnap, LeGrand Medlin, Walter |
author_facet | Zaveri, Hinali Surve, Amit Cottam, Daniel Summerhays, Christina Cottam, Austin Richards, Christina Belnap, LeGrand Medlin, Walter |
author_sort | Zaveri, Hinali |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of data available to determine the safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery in the elderly population. Additionally, there are no studies showing the effect of the single anastomosis duodenal switch (SADS) has on the elderly obese, in comparison with other more popular procedures. Here we compare laparoscopic gastric band surgery (LAGB), Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (LRYGB), and the SADS to analyze the weight loss, perioperative and postoperative morbidity in the patients >70 years of age at a single US center. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 53 consecutive patients ≥70 years old who underwent weight loss surgery from 2009 to 2015.Weight loss in terms of the percentage excess body mass index lost (%EBMIL), percentage excess weight lost (%EWL) and body mass index (BMI) points lost, resolution of comorbidities, length of stay, early (30-day) and late complication rates were compared using descriptive statistics and non-linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 53 patients, 24 underwent LAGB, 14 underwent LRYGB and 15 underwent SADS. The average patient age was 72.7 ± 2.5 years (range, 70–81.4) and 66 % were females. There was no statistical difference in the demographic data between three groups except for age and sleep apnea. There were no operative or early deaths. There were differences in complication rates between the surgical arms; however, with our small data set statistical significance was not achieved. There was 1 patient who lost to follow up in SADS group. Follow up time period was 18 months. % EBMIL and BMI reduction showed a statistically significant difference between the procedures, where the SADS had the highest loss of %EBMIL and BMI points. Comorbidities prevalence decreased post-operatively with SADS having higher percentage of patients who had resolution of their comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Each of the three procedures can be performed on patients older than 70 with low morbidity rate. However, when the focus is weight loss alone, the SADS procedure is the most effective of the three procedures in regards to weight loss in the short term for patients older than 70. The SADS is as safe as RYGB but LAGB with all its limitations is still the safest bariatric procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5055526 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50555262016-10-28 A comparison of outcomes of bariatric surgery in patient greater than 70 with 18 month of follow up Zaveri, Hinali Surve, Amit Cottam, Daniel Summerhays, Christina Cottam, Austin Richards, Christina Belnap, LeGrand Medlin, Walter Springerplus Research BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of data available to determine the safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery in the elderly population. Additionally, there are no studies showing the effect of the single anastomosis duodenal switch (SADS) has on the elderly obese, in comparison with other more popular procedures. Here we compare laparoscopic gastric band surgery (LAGB), Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (LRYGB), and the SADS to analyze the weight loss, perioperative and postoperative morbidity in the patients >70 years of age at a single US center. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 53 consecutive patients ≥70 years old who underwent weight loss surgery from 2009 to 2015.Weight loss in terms of the percentage excess body mass index lost (%EBMIL), percentage excess weight lost (%EWL) and body mass index (BMI) points lost, resolution of comorbidities, length of stay, early (30-day) and late complication rates were compared using descriptive statistics and non-linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 53 patients, 24 underwent LAGB, 14 underwent LRYGB and 15 underwent SADS. The average patient age was 72.7 ± 2.5 years (range, 70–81.4) and 66 % were females. There was no statistical difference in the demographic data between three groups except for age and sleep apnea. There were no operative or early deaths. There were differences in complication rates between the surgical arms; however, with our small data set statistical significance was not achieved. There was 1 patient who lost to follow up in SADS group. Follow up time period was 18 months. % EBMIL and BMI reduction showed a statistically significant difference between the procedures, where the SADS had the highest loss of %EBMIL and BMI points. Comorbidities prevalence decreased post-operatively with SADS having higher percentage of patients who had resolution of their comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Each of the three procedures can be performed on patients older than 70 with low morbidity rate. However, when the focus is weight loss alone, the SADS procedure is the most effective of the three procedures in regards to weight loss in the short term for patients older than 70. The SADS is as safe as RYGB but LAGB with all its limitations is still the safest bariatric procedure. Springer International Publishing 2016-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5055526/ /pubmed/27795883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3392-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Zaveri, Hinali Surve, Amit Cottam, Daniel Summerhays, Christina Cottam, Austin Richards, Christina Belnap, LeGrand Medlin, Walter A comparison of outcomes of bariatric surgery in patient greater than 70 with 18 month of follow up |
title | A comparison of outcomes of bariatric surgery in patient greater than 70 with 18 month of follow up |
title_full | A comparison of outcomes of bariatric surgery in patient greater than 70 with 18 month of follow up |
title_fullStr | A comparison of outcomes of bariatric surgery in patient greater than 70 with 18 month of follow up |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of outcomes of bariatric surgery in patient greater than 70 with 18 month of follow up |
title_short | A comparison of outcomes of bariatric surgery in patient greater than 70 with 18 month of follow up |
title_sort | comparison of outcomes of bariatric surgery in patient greater than 70 with 18 month of follow up |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5055526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27795883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3392-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zaverihinali acomparisonofoutcomesofbariatricsurgeryinpatientgreaterthan70with18monthoffollowup AT surveamit acomparisonofoutcomesofbariatricsurgeryinpatientgreaterthan70with18monthoffollowup AT cottamdaniel acomparisonofoutcomesofbariatricsurgeryinpatientgreaterthan70with18monthoffollowup AT summerhayschristina acomparisonofoutcomesofbariatricsurgeryinpatientgreaterthan70with18monthoffollowup AT cottamaustin acomparisonofoutcomesofbariatricsurgeryinpatientgreaterthan70with18monthoffollowup AT richardschristina acomparisonofoutcomesofbariatricsurgeryinpatientgreaterthan70with18monthoffollowup AT belnaplegrand acomparisonofoutcomesofbariatricsurgeryinpatientgreaterthan70with18monthoffollowup AT medlinwalter acomparisonofoutcomesofbariatricsurgeryinpatientgreaterthan70with18monthoffollowup AT zaverihinali comparisonofoutcomesofbariatricsurgeryinpatientgreaterthan70with18monthoffollowup AT surveamit comparisonofoutcomesofbariatricsurgeryinpatientgreaterthan70with18monthoffollowup AT cottamdaniel comparisonofoutcomesofbariatricsurgeryinpatientgreaterthan70with18monthoffollowup AT summerhayschristina comparisonofoutcomesofbariatricsurgeryinpatientgreaterthan70with18monthoffollowup AT cottamaustin comparisonofoutcomesofbariatricsurgeryinpatientgreaterthan70with18monthoffollowup AT richardschristina comparisonofoutcomesofbariatricsurgeryinpatientgreaterthan70with18monthoffollowup AT belnaplegrand comparisonofoutcomesofbariatricsurgeryinpatientgreaterthan70with18monthoffollowup AT medlinwalter comparisonofoutcomesofbariatricsurgeryinpatientgreaterthan70with18monthoffollowup |