Cargando…

The Predictive Processing Paradigm Has Roots in Kant

Predictive processing (PP) is a paradigm in computational and cognitive neuroscience that has recently attracted significant attention across domains, including psychology, robotics, artificial intelligence and philosophy. It is often regarded as a fresh and possibly revolutionary paradigm shift, ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Swanson, Link R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5056171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27777555
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00079
_version_ 1782458844543188992
author Swanson, Link R.
author_facet Swanson, Link R.
author_sort Swanson, Link R.
collection PubMed
description Predictive processing (PP) is a paradigm in computational and cognitive neuroscience that has recently attracted significant attention across domains, including psychology, robotics, artificial intelligence and philosophy. It is often regarded as a fresh and possibly revolutionary paradigm shift, yet a handful of authors have remarked that aspects of PP seem reminiscent of the work of 18th century philosopher Immanuel Kant. To date there have not been any substantive discussions of how exactly PP links back to Kant. In this article, I argue that several core aspects of PP were anticipated by Kant (1996/1787) in his works on perception and cognition. Themes from Kant active in PP include: (1) the emphasis on “top-down” generation of percepts; (2) the role of “hyperpriors”; (3) the general function of “generative models”; (4) the process of “analysis-by-synthesis”; and (5) the crucial role of imagination in perception. In addition to these, I also point out that PP echoes Kant’s general project in that it aims to explain how minds track causal structure in the world using only sensory data, and that it uses a reverse-engineer or “top-down” method of analysis. I then locate a possible source of Kant’s influence on PP by tracing the paradigm back to Hermann von Helmholtz, who saw himself as providing a scientific implementation of Kant’s conclusions. I conclude by arguing that PP should not be regarded as a new paradigm, but is more appropriately understood as the latest incarnation of an approach to perception and cognition initiated by Kant and refined by Helmholtz.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5056171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50561712016-10-24 The Predictive Processing Paradigm Has Roots in Kant Swanson, Link R. Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Predictive processing (PP) is a paradigm in computational and cognitive neuroscience that has recently attracted significant attention across domains, including psychology, robotics, artificial intelligence and philosophy. It is often regarded as a fresh and possibly revolutionary paradigm shift, yet a handful of authors have remarked that aspects of PP seem reminiscent of the work of 18th century philosopher Immanuel Kant. To date there have not been any substantive discussions of how exactly PP links back to Kant. In this article, I argue that several core aspects of PP were anticipated by Kant (1996/1787) in his works on perception and cognition. Themes from Kant active in PP include: (1) the emphasis on “top-down” generation of percepts; (2) the role of “hyperpriors”; (3) the general function of “generative models”; (4) the process of “analysis-by-synthesis”; and (5) the crucial role of imagination in perception. In addition to these, I also point out that PP echoes Kant’s general project in that it aims to explain how minds track causal structure in the world using only sensory data, and that it uses a reverse-engineer or “top-down” method of analysis. I then locate a possible source of Kant’s influence on PP by tracing the paradigm back to Hermann von Helmholtz, who saw himself as providing a scientific implementation of Kant’s conclusions. I conclude by arguing that PP should not be regarded as a new paradigm, but is more appropriately understood as the latest incarnation of an approach to perception and cognition initiated by Kant and refined by Helmholtz. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5056171/ /pubmed/27777555 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00079 Text en Copyright © 2016 Swanson. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Swanson, Link R.
The Predictive Processing Paradigm Has Roots in Kant
title The Predictive Processing Paradigm Has Roots in Kant
title_full The Predictive Processing Paradigm Has Roots in Kant
title_fullStr The Predictive Processing Paradigm Has Roots in Kant
title_full_unstemmed The Predictive Processing Paradigm Has Roots in Kant
title_short The Predictive Processing Paradigm Has Roots in Kant
title_sort predictive processing paradigm has roots in kant
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5056171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27777555
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00079
work_keys_str_mv AT swansonlinkr thepredictiveprocessingparadigmhasrootsinkant
AT swansonlinkr predictiveprocessingparadigmhasrootsinkant