Cargando…

Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of different commercial quality assurance (QA) systems for the pretreatment verification plan of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique using a flattening-filter-free beam. The verification for 20 pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Jin-Beom, Kang, Sang-Won, Eom, Keun-Yong, Song, Changhoon, Choi, Kyoung-Sik, Suh, Tae Suk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5056205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27709851
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.11.1742
_version_ 1782458852640292864
author Chung, Jin-Beom
Kang, Sang-Won
Eom, Keun-Yong
Song, Changhoon
Choi, Kyoung-Sik
Suh, Tae Suk
author_facet Chung, Jin-Beom
Kang, Sang-Won
Eom, Keun-Yong
Song, Changhoon
Choi, Kyoung-Sik
Suh, Tae Suk
author_sort Chung, Jin-Beom
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of different commercial quality assurance (QA) systems for the pretreatment verification plan of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique using a flattening-filter-free beam. The verification for 20 pretreatment cancer patients (seven lung, six spine, and seven prostate cancers) were tested using three QA systems (EBT3 film, I’mRT MatriXX array, and MapCHECK). All the SBRT-VMAT plans were optimized in the Eclipse (version 11.0.34) treatment planning system (TPS) using the Acuros XB dose calculation algorithm and were delivered to the Varian TrueBeam(®) accelerator equipped with a high-definition multileaf collimator. Gamma agreement evaluation was analyzed with the criteria of 2% dose difference and 2 mm distance to agreement (2%/2 mm) or 3%/3 mm. The highest passing rate (99.1% for 3%/3 mm) was observed on the MapCHECK system while the lowest passing rate was obtained on the film. The pretreatment verification results depend on the QA systems, treatment sites, and delivery beam energies. However, the delivery QA results for all QA systems based on the TPS calculation showed a good agreement of more than 90% for both the criteria. It is concluded that the three 2D QA systems have sufficient potential for pretreatment verification of the SBRT-VMAT plan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5056205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50562052016-11-01 Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams Chung, Jin-Beom Kang, Sang-Won Eom, Keun-Yong Song, Changhoon Choi, Kyoung-Sik Suh, Tae Suk J Korean Med Sci Original Article The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of different commercial quality assurance (QA) systems for the pretreatment verification plan of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique using a flattening-filter-free beam. The verification for 20 pretreatment cancer patients (seven lung, six spine, and seven prostate cancers) were tested using three QA systems (EBT3 film, I’mRT MatriXX array, and MapCHECK). All the SBRT-VMAT plans were optimized in the Eclipse (version 11.0.34) treatment planning system (TPS) using the Acuros XB dose calculation algorithm and were delivered to the Varian TrueBeam(®) accelerator equipped with a high-definition multileaf collimator. Gamma agreement evaluation was analyzed with the criteria of 2% dose difference and 2 mm distance to agreement (2%/2 mm) or 3%/3 mm. The highest passing rate (99.1% for 3%/3 mm) was observed on the MapCHECK system while the lowest passing rate was obtained on the film. The pretreatment verification results depend on the QA systems, treatment sites, and delivery beam energies. However, the delivery QA results for all QA systems based on the TPS calculation showed a good agreement of more than 90% for both the criteria. It is concluded that the three 2D QA systems have sufficient potential for pretreatment verification of the SBRT-VMAT plan. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2016-11 2016-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5056205/ /pubmed/27709851 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.11.1742 Text en © 2016 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chung, Jin-Beom
Kang, Sang-Won
Eom, Keun-Yong
Song, Changhoon
Choi, Kyoung-Sik
Suh, Tae Suk
Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams
title Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams
title_full Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams
title_fullStr Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams
title_short Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams
title_sort comparison of dosimetric performance among commercial quality assurance systems for verifying pretreatment plans of stereotactic body radiotherapy using flattening-filter-free beams
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5056205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27709851
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.11.1742
work_keys_str_mv AT chungjinbeom comparisonofdosimetricperformanceamongcommercialqualityassurancesystemsforverifyingpretreatmentplansofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingflatteningfilterfreebeams
AT kangsangwon comparisonofdosimetricperformanceamongcommercialqualityassurancesystemsforverifyingpretreatmentplansofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingflatteningfilterfreebeams
AT eomkeunyong comparisonofdosimetricperformanceamongcommercialqualityassurancesystemsforverifyingpretreatmentplansofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingflatteningfilterfreebeams
AT songchanghoon comparisonofdosimetricperformanceamongcommercialqualityassurancesystemsforverifyingpretreatmentplansofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingflatteningfilterfreebeams
AT choikyoungsik comparisonofdosimetricperformanceamongcommercialqualityassurancesystemsforverifyingpretreatmentplansofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingflatteningfilterfreebeams
AT suhtaesuk comparisonofdosimetricperformanceamongcommercialqualityassurancesystemsforverifyingpretreatmentplansofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingflatteningfilterfreebeams