Cargando…
Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams
The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of different commercial quality assurance (QA) systems for the pretreatment verification plan of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique using a flattening-filter-free beam. The verification for 20 pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5056205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27709851 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.11.1742 |
_version_ | 1782458852640292864 |
---|---|
author | Chung, Jin-Beom Kang, Sang-Won Eom, Keun-Yong Song, Changhoon Choi, Kyoung-Sik Suh, Tae Suk |
author_facet | Chung, Jin-Beom Kang, Sang-Won Eom, Keun-Yong Song, Changhoon Choi, Kyoung-Sik Suh, Tae Suk |
author_sort | Chung, Jin-Beom |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of different commercial quality assurance (QA) systems for the pretreatment verification plan of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique using a flattening-filter-free beam. The verification for 20 pretreatment cancer patients (seven lung, six spine, and seven prostate cancers) were tested using three QA systems (EBT3 film, I’mRT MatriXX array, and MapCHECK). All the SBRT-VMAT plans were optimized in the Eclipse (version 11.0.34) treatment planning system (TPS) using the Acuros XB dose calculation algorithm and were delivered to the Varian TrueBeam(®) accelerator equipped with a high-definition multileaf collimator. Gamma agreement evaluation was analyzed with the criteria of 2% dose difference and 2 mm distance to agreement (2%/2 mm) or 3%/3 mm. The highest passing rate (99.1% for 3%/3 mm) was observed on the MapCHECK system while the lowest passing rate was obtained on the film. The pretreatment verification results depend on the QA systems, treatment sites, and delivery beam energies. However, the delivery QA results for all QA systems based on the TPS calculation showed a good agreement of more than 90% for both the criteria. It is concluded that the three 2D QA systems have sufficient potential for pretreatment verification of the SBRT-VMAT plan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5056205 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50562052016-11-01 Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams Chung, Jin-Beom Kang, Sang-Won Eom, Keun-Yong Song, Changhoon Choi, Kyoung-Sik Suh, Tae Suk J Korean Med Sci Original Article The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of different commercial quality assurance (QA) systems for the pretreatment verification plan of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique using a flattening-filter-free beam. The verification for 20 pretreatment cancer patients (seven lung, six spine, and seven prostate cancers) were tested using three QA systems (EBT3 film, I’mRT MatriXX array, and MapCHECK). All the SBRT-VMAT plans were optimized in the Eclipse (version 11.0.34) treatment planning system (TPS) using the Acuros XB dose calculation algorithm and were delivered to the Varian TrueBeam(®) accelerator equipped with a high-definition multileaf collimator. Gamma agreement evaluation was analyzed with the criteria of 2% dose difference and 2 mm distance to agreement (2%/2 mm) or 3%/3 mm. The highest passing rate (99.1% for 3%/3 mm) was observed on the MapCHECK system while the lowest passing rate was obtained on the film. The pretreatment verification results depend on the QA systems, treatment sites, and delivery beam energies. However, the delivery QA results for all QA systems based on the TPS calculation showed a good agreement of more than 90% for both the criteria. It is concluded that the three 2D QA systems have sufficient potential for pretreatment verification of the SBRT-VMAT plan. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2016-11 2016-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5056205/ /pubmed/27709851 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.11.1742 Text en © 2016 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chung, Jin-Beom Kang, Sang-Won Eom, Keun-Yong Song, Changhoon Choi, Kyoung-Sik Suh, Tae Suk Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams |
title | Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams |
title_full | Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams |
title_short | Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams |
title_sort | comparison of dosimetric performance among commercial quality assurance systems for verifying pretreatment plans of stereotactic body radiotherapy using flattening-filter-free beams |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5056205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27709851 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.11.1742 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chungjinbeom comparisonofdosimetricperformanceamongcommercialqualityassurancesystemsforverifyingpretreatmentplansofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingflatteningfilterfreebeams AT kangsangwon comparisonofdosimetricperformanceamongcommercialqualityassurancesystemsforverifyingpretreatmentplansofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingflatteningfilterfreebeams AT eomkeunyong comparisonofdosimetricperformanceamongcommercialqualityassurancesystemsforverifyingpretreatmentplansofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingflatteningfilterfreebeams AT songchanghoon comparisonofdosimetricperformanceamongcommercialqualityassurancesystemsforverifyingpretreatmentplansofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingflatteningfilterfreebeams AT choikyoungsik comparisonofdosimetricperformanceamongcommercialqualityassurancesystemsforverifyingpretreatmentplansofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingflatteningfilterfreebeams AT suhtaesuk comparisonofdosimetricperformanceamongcommercialqualityassurancesystemsforverifyingpretreatmentplansofstereotacticbodyradiotherapyusingflatteningfilterfreebeams |