Cargando…

The Intracranial Volume Pressure Response in Increased Intracranial Pressure Patients: Clinical Significance of the Volume Pressure Indicator

BACKGROUND: For patients suffering from primary brain injury, monitoring intracranial pressure alone is not enough to reflect the dynamic intracranial condition. In our previous study, a segment of the pressure-volume curve can be expressed by the parabolic regression model with single indicator “a”...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lai, Hung-Yi, Lee, Ching-Hsin, Lee, Ching-Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5056694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27723794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164263
_version_ 1782458941606723584
author Lai, Hung-Yi
Lee, Ching-Hsin
Lee, Ching-Yi
author_facet Lai, Hung-Yi
Lee, Ching-Hsin
Lee, Ching-Yi
author_sort Lai, Hung-Yi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For patients suffering from primary brain injury, monitoring intracranial pressure alone is not enough to reflect the dynamic intracranial condition. In our previous study, a segment of the pressure-volume curve can be expressed by the parabolic regression model with single indicator “a”. The aim of this study is to evaluate if the indicator “a” can reflect intracranial conditions. METHODS: Patients with traumatic brain injury, spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage, and/or hydrocephalus who had external ventricular drainage from January 2009 to February 2010 were included. The successive volume pressure response values were obtained by successive drainage of cerebral spinal fluid from intracranial pressure 20–25 mm Hg to 10 mm Hg. The relationship between withdrawn cerebral spinal fluid volume and intracranial pressure was analyzed by the parabolic regression model with single parameter “a”. RESULTS: The overall mean for indicator “a” was 0.422 ± 0.046. The mean of “a” in hydrocephalus was 0.173 ± 0.024 and in severe intracranial mass with slender ventricle, it was 0.663 ± 0.062. The two extreme intracranial conditions had a statistical significant difference (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The indicator “a” of a pressure-volume curve can reflect the dynamic intracranial condition and is comparable in different situations. A significantly larger indicator “a” with increased intracranial pressure is always observed in severe intracranial mass lesions with cerebral edema. A significantly smaller indicator “a” with increased intracranial pressure is observed in hydrocephalus. Brain computed tomography should be performed early if a rapid elevation of indicator “a” is detected, as it can reveal some ongoing intracranial pathology prior to clinical deterioration. Increased intracranial pressure was frequently observed in patients with intracranial pathology. The progression can be differentiated using the pattern of the volume pressure indicator.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5056694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50566942016-10-27 The Intracranial Volume Pressure Response in Increased Intracranial Pressure Patients: Clinical Significance of the Volume Pressure Indicator Lai, Hung-Yi Lee, Ching-Hsin Lee, Ching-Yi PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: For patients suffering from primary brain injury, monitoring intracranial pressure alone is not enough to reflect the dynamic intracranial condition. In our previous study, a segment of the pressure-volume curve can be expressed by the parabolic regression model with single indicator “a”. The aim of this study is to evaluate if the indicator “a” can reflect intracranial conditions. METHODS: Patients with traumatic brain injury, spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage, and/or hydrocephalus who had external ventricular drainage from January 2009 to February 2010 were included. The successive volume pressure response values were obtained by successive drainage of cerebral spinal fluid from intracranial pressure 20–25 mm Hg to 10 mm Hg. The relationship between withdrawn cerebral spinal fluid volume and intracranial pressure was analyzed by the parabolic regression model with single parameter “a”. RESULTS: The overall mean for indicator “a” was 0.422 ± 0.046. The mean of “a” in hydrocephalus was 0.173 ± 0.024 and in severe intracranial mass with slender ventricle, it was 0.663 ± 0.062. The two extreme intracranial conditions had a statistical significant difference (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The indicator “a” of a pressure-volume curve can reflect the dynamic intracranial condition and is comparable in different situations. A significantly larger indicator “a” with increased intracranial pressure is always observed in severe intracranial mass lesions with cerebral edema. A significantly smaller indicator “a” with increased intracranial pressure is observed in hydrocephalus. Brain computed tomography should be performed early if a rapid elevation of indicator “a” is detected, as it can reveal some ongoing intracranial pathology prior to clinical deterioration. Increased intracranial pressure was frequently observed in patients with intracranial pathology. The progression can be differentiated using the pattern of the volume pressure indicator. Public Library of Science 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5056694/ /pubmed/27723794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164263 Text en © 2016 Lai et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lai, Hung-Yi
Lee, Ching-Hsin
Lee, Ching-Yi
The Intracranial Volume Pressure Response in Increased Intracranial Pressure Patients: Clinical Significance of the Volume Pressure Indicator
title The Intracranial Volume Pressure Response in Increased Intracranial Pressure Patients: Clinical Significance of the Volume Pressure Indicator
title_full The Intracranial Volume Pressure Response in Increased Intracranial Pressure Patients: Clinical Significance of the Volume Pressure Indicator
title_fullStr The Intracranial Volume Pressure Response in Increased Intracranial Pressure Patients: Clinical Significance of the Volume Pressure Indicator
title_full_unstemmed The Intracranial Volume Pressure Response in Increased Intracranial Pressure Patients: Clinical Significance of the Volume Pressure Indicator
title_short The Intracranial Volume Pressure Response in Increased Intracranial Pressure Patients: Clinical Significance of the Volume Pressure Indicator
title_sort intracranial volume pressure response in increased intracranial pressure patients: clinical significance of the volume pressure indicator
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5056694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27723794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164263
work_keys_str_mv AT laihungyi theintracranialvolumepressureresponseinincreasedintracranialpressurepatientsclinicalsignificanceofthevolumepressureindicator
AT leechinghsin theintracranialvolumepressureresponseinincreasedintracranialpressurepatientsclinicalsignificanceofthevolumepressureindicator
AT leechingyi theintracranialvolumepressureresponseinincreasedintracranialpressurepatientsclinicalsignificanceofthevolumepressureindicator
AT laihungyi intracranialvolumepressureresponseinincreasedintracranialpressurepatientsclinicalsignificanceofthevolumepressureindicator
AT leechinghsin intracranialvolumepressureresponseinincreasedintracranialpressurepatientsclinicalsignificanceofthevolumepressureindicator
AT leechingyi intracranialvolumepressureresponseinincreasedintracranialpressurepatientsclinicalsignificanceofthevolumepressureindicator