Cargando…
Efficacy of Probiotic Supplementation Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
BACKGROUND: Traditional Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapies have shown efficacies below 80% in several studies, and their use has been accompanied by antibiotic-related side effects. Some recent studies have reported that supplementing standard therapies with probiotics can improve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5056761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27723762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163743 |
_version_ | 1782458956806881280 |
---|---|
author | LÜ, Muhan Yu, Shan Deng, Jiaqi Yan, Qiong Yang, Chun Xia, Guodong Zhou, Xian |
author_facet | LÜ, Muhan Yu, Shan Deng, Jiaqi Yan, Qiong Yang, Chun Xia, Guodong Zhou, Xian |
author_sort | LÜ, Muhan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Traditional Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapies have shown efficacies below 80% in several studies, and their use has been accompanied by antibiotic-related side effects. Some recent studies have reported that supplementing standard therapies with probiotics can improve the efficacy and tolerability of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of probiotic supplementation on the eradication rates and therapy-related adverse event rates of anti-Helicobacter pylori regimens. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials and the Chinese Biomedical Database for eligible randomized controlled trials published through July, 2015. Review Manager 5.3 was used for all statistical analyses. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving a total of 2306 patients were included in our analysis. Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis performed using a fixed-effects model (test for heterogeneity I(2) = 45%) showed that the pooled relative risk (RR) of eradication was significantly higher in the probiotic supplementation group than in the control group [RR 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10–1.20, P<0.00001]. The incidence of total antibiotic-related side effects was lower in the probiotic supplementation group than in the control group, and the pooled RR (studies n = 9) was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.54–0.94, P = 0.02), as determined using a random-effects model (heterogeneity test I(2) = 59%). Certain adverse events, such as nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.35–0.95, P = 0.03), diarrhea (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31–0.84, P = 0.008) and constipation (RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28–0.80, P = 0.005), were reported at lower rates in the probiotic supplementation group than in the control group. Subgroup analysis showed that eradication rates were significantly improved in both adults (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09–1.19, P<0.00001) and children (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05–1.47, P = 0.01) in the probiotic supplementation group and that no regional differences between Europe (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.09–1.24, P<0.00001) and Asia were present (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06–1.22, P = 0.0002). However, the total adverse event rate was not decreased in the adult group (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.61–1.04, P = 0.1) or the Asian group (RR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.39–1.18, P = 0.17). Subgroup analyses examining therapy regimens and treatment durations showed that probiotic supplementation increased eradication rates in the triple-therapy (RR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.12–1.25, P<0.00001), seven-day treatment (RR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.12–1.31, P<0.00001) and fourteen-day treatment (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06–1.20, P = 0.0002) groups. The incidence of antibiotic-related side effects was significantly reduced in all groups, with the exception of the quadruple-therapy subgroup (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.60–2.13, P = 0.07) and the fourteen-day therapy subgroup (RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.61–1.51, P = 0.86). Supplementation with Lactobacillus alone (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.12–1.38, P<0.0001) or multi-strain probiotics (RR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.07–1.18, P<0.00001) was effective at improving H. pylori eradication rates. However, supplementation with Lactobacillus alone did not significantly decrease the overall incidence of side effects (RR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.11–3.51, P = 0.58). Our study also showed that probiotic supplementation before, during or after H. pylori eradication therapy improved eradication rates, regardless of supplementation duration. Furthermore, probiotic supplementation during H. pylori treatment reduced the incidence of side effects. CONCLUSION: Probiotic supplementation during anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment may be effective for improving H. pylori eradication rates, minimizing the incidence of therapy-related adverse events and alleviating most disease-related clinical symptoms. However, our results should be interpreted with caution because of the presence of heterogeneity across the trials included in this analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5056761 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50567612016-10-27 Efficacy of Probiotic Supplementation Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials LÜ, Muhan Yu, Shan Deng, Jiaqi Yan, Qiong Yang, Chun Xia, Guodong Zhou, Xian PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Traditional Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapies have shown efficacies below 80% in several studies, and their use has been accompanied by antibiotic-related side effects. Some recent studies have reported that supplementing standard therapies with probiotics can improve the efficacy and tolerability of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of probiotic supplementation on the eradication rates and therapy-related adverse event rates of anti-Helicobacter pylori regimens. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials and the Chinese Biomedical Database for eligible randomized controlled trials published through July, 2015. Review Manager 5.3 was used for all statistical analyses. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving a total of 2306 patients were included in our analysis. Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis performed using a fixed-effects model (test for heterogeneity I(2) = 45%) showed that the pooled relative risk (RR) of eradication was significantly higher in the probiotic supplementation group than in the control group [RR 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10–1.20, P<0.00001]. The incidence of total antibiotic-related side effects was lower in the probiotic supplementation group than in the control group, and the pooled RR (studies n = 9) was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.54–0.94, P = 0.02), as determined using a random-effects model (heterogeneity test I(2) = 59%). Certain adverse events, such as nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.35–0.95, P = 0.03), diarrhea (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31–0.84, P = 0.008) and constipation (RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28–0.80, P = 0.005), were reported at lower rates in the probiotic supplementation group than in the control group. Subgroup analysis showed that eradication rates were significantly improved in both adults (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09–1.19, P<0.00001) and children (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05–1.47, P = 0.01) in the probiotic supplementation group and that no regional differences between Europe (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.09–1.24, P<0.00001) and Asia were present (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06–1.22, P = 0.0002). However, the total adverse event rate was not decreased in the adult group (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.61–1.04, P = 0.1) or the Asian group (RR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.39–1.18, P = 0.17). Subgroup analyses examining therapy regimens and treatment durations showed that probiotic supplementation increased eradication rates in the triple-therapy (RR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.12–1.25, P<0.00001), seven-day treatment (RR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.12–1.31, P<0.00001) and fourteen-day treatment (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06–1.20, P = 0.0002) groups. The incidence of antibiotic-related side effects was significantly reduced in all groups, with the exception of the quadruple-therapy subgroup (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.60–2.13, P = 0.07) and the fourteen-day therapy subgroup (RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.61–1.51, P = 0.86). Supplementation with Lactobacillus alone (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.12–1.38, P<0.0001) or multi-strain probiotics (RR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.07–1.18, P<0.00001) was effective at improving H. pylori eradication rates. However, supplementation with Lactobacillus alone did not significantly decrease the overall incidence of side effects (RR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.11–3.51, P = 0.58). Our study also showed that probiotic supplementation before, during or after H. pylori eradication therapy improved eradication rates, regardless of supplementation duration. Furthermore, probiotic supplementation during H. pylori treatment reduced the incidence of side effects. CONCLUSION: Probiotic supplementation during anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment may be effective for improving H. pylori eradication rates, minimizing the incidence of therapy-related adverse events and alleviating most disease-related clinical symptoms. However, our results should be interpreted with caution because of the presence of heterogeneity across the trials included in this analysis. Public Library of Science 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5056761/ /pubmed/27723762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163743 Text en © 2016 LÜ et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article LÜ, Muhan Yu, Shan Deng, Jiaqi Yan, Qiong Yang, Chun Xia, Guodong Zhou, Xian Efficacy of Probiotic Supplementation Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Efficacy of Probiotic Supplementation Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Efficacy of Probiotic Supplementation Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Probiotic Supplementation Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Probiotic Supplementation Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Efficacy of Probiotic Supplementation Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | efficacy of probiotic supplementation therapy for helicobacter pylori eradication: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5056761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27723762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163743 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lumuhan efficacyofprobioticsupplementationtherapyforhelicobacterpylorieradicationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yushan efficacyofprobioticsupplementationtherapyforhelicobacterpylorieradicationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT dengjiaqi efficacyofprobioticsupplementationtherapyforhelicobacterpylorieradicationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yanqiong efficacyofprobioticsupplementationtherapyforhelicobacterpylorieradicationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yangchun efficacyofprobioticsupplementationtherapyforhelicobacterpylorieradicationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT xiaguodong efficacyofprobioticsupplementationtherapyforhelicobacterpylorieradicationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhouxian efficacyofprobioticsupplementationtherapyforhelicobacterpylorieradicationametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |