Cargando…
Clinical performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using targeted cell‐free DNA analysis in maternal plasma with microarrays or next generation sequencing (NGS) is consistent across multiple controlled clinical studies
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21, 18, and 13 using targeted cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) analysis. METHODS: Targeted cfDNA analysis using DANSR™ and FORTE™ with microarray quantitation was used to evaluate the risk of trisomy 21, 18, and 13 in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26332378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.4686 |
_version_ | 1782459044032675840 |
---|---|
author | Stokowski, Renee Wang, Eric White, Karen Batey, Annette Jacobsson, Bo. Brar, Herb Balanarasimha, Madhumitha Hollemon, Desiree Sparks, Andrew Nicolaides, Kypros Musci, Thomas J. |
author_facet | Stokowski, Renee Wang, Eric White, Karen Batey, Annette Jacobsson, Bo. Brar, Herb Balanarasimha, Madhumitha Hollemon, Desiree Sparks, Andrew Nicolaides, Kypros Musci, Thomas J. |
author_sort | Stokowski, Renee |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21, 18, and 13 using targeted cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) analysis. METHODS: Targeted cfDNA analysis using DANSR™ and FORTE™ with microarray quantitation was used to evaluate the risk of trisomy 21, 18, and 13 in blinded samples from 799 singleton, twin, natural, and IVF pregnancies. Subjects either had fetal chromosome evaluation by karyotype, FISH, QF‐PCR, or karyotype for newborns with suspected aneuploidy at birth. The results of targeted cfDNA analysis were compared to clinical genetic testing outcomes to assess clinical performance. RESULTS: Targeted cfDNA analysis with microarray quantification identified 107/108 trisomy 21 cases (99.1%), 29/30 trisomy 18 cases (96.7%), and 12/12 trisomy 13 cases (100%). The specificity was 100% for all three trisomies. Combining this data with all published clinical performance studies using DANSR/FORTE methodology for greater than 23 000 pregnancies, the sensitivity of targeted cfDNA analysis was calculated to be greater than 99% for trisomy 21, 97% for trisomy 18, and 94% for trisomy 13. Specificity for each trisomy was greater than 99.9%. CONCLUSION: Targeted cfDNA analysis demonstrates consistently high sensitivity and extremely low false positive rates for common autosomal trisomies in pregnancy across quantitation platforms. © 2015 Ariosa Diagnostics Inc. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5057317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50573172016-10-19 Clinical performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using targeted cell‐free DNA analysis in maternal plasma with microarrays or next generation sequencing (NGS) is consistent across multiple controlled clinical studies Stokowski, Renee Wang, Eric White, Karen Batey, Annette Jacobsson, Bo. Brar, Herb Balanarasimha, Madhumitha Hollemon, Desiree Sparks, Andrew Nicolaides, Kypros Musci, Thomas J. Prenat Diagn Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21, 18, and 13 using targeted cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) analysis. METHODS: Targeted cfDNA analysis using DANSR™ and FORTE™ with microarray quantitation was used to evaluate the risk of trisomy 21, 18, and 13 in blinded samples from 799 singleton, twin, natural, and IVF pregnancies. Subjects either had fetal chromosome evaluation by karyotype, FISH, QF‐PCR, or karyotype for newborns with suspected aneuploidy at birth. The results of targeted cfDNA analysis were compared to clinical genetic testing outcomes to assess clinical performance. RESULTS: Targeted cfDNA analysis with microarray quantification identified 107/108 trisomy 21 cases (99.1%), 29/30 trisomy 18 cases (96.7%), and 12/12 trisomy 13 cases (100%). The specificity was 100% for all three trisomies. Combining this data with all published clinical performance studies using DANSR/FORTE methodology for greater than 23 000 pregnancies, the sensitivity of targeted cfDNA analysis was calculated to be greater than 99% for trisomy 21, 97% for trisomy 18, and 94% for trisomy 13. Specificity for each trisomy was greater than 99.9%. CONCLUSION: Targeted cfDNA analysis demonstrates consistently high sensitivity and extremely low false positive rates for common autosomal trisomies in pregnancy across quantitation platforms. © 2015 Ariosa Diagnostics Inc. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-10-25 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5057317/ /pubmed/26332378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.4686 Text en © 2015 Ariosa Diagnostics Inc. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Stokowski, Renee Wang, Eric White, Karen Batey, Annette Jacobsson, Bo. Brar, Herb Balanarasimha, Madhumitha Hollemon, Desiree Sparks, Andrew Nicolaides, Kypros Musci, Thomas J. Clinical performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using targeted cell‐free DNA analysis in maternal plasma with microarrays or next generation sequencing (NGS) is consistent across multiple controlled clinical studies |
title | Clinical performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using targeted cell‐free DNA analysis in maternal plasma with microarrays or next generation sequencing (NGS) is consistent across multiple controlled clinical studies |
title_full | Clinical performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using targeted cell‐free DNA analysis in maternal plasma with microarrays or next generation sequencing (NGS) is consistent across multiple controlled clinical studies |
title_fullStr | Clinical performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using targeted cell‐free DNA analysis in maternal plasma with microarrays or next generation sequencing (NGS) is consistent across multiple controlled clinical studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using targeted cell‐free DNA analysis in maternal plasma with microarrays or next generation sequencing (NGS) is consistent across multiple controlled clinical studies |
title_short | Clinical performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using targeted cell‐free DNA analysis in maternal plasma with microarrays or next generation sequencing (NGS) is consistent across multiple controlled clinical studies |
title_sort | clinical performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing (nipt) using targeted cell‐free dna analysis in maternal plasma with microarrays or next generation sequencing (ngs) is consistent across multiple controlled clinical studies |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26332378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.4686 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stokowskirenee clinicalperformanceofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptusingtargetedcellfreednaanalysisinmaternalplasmawithmicroarraysornextgenerationsequencingngsisconsistentacrossmultiplecontrolledclinicalstudies AT wangeric clinicalperformanceofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptusingtargetedcellfreednaanalysisinmaternalplasmawithmicroarraysornextgenerationsequencingngsisconsistentacrossmultiplecontrolledclinicalstudies AT whitekaren clinicalperformanceofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptusingtargetedcellfreednaanalysisinmaternalplasmawithmicroarraysornextgenerationsequencingngsisconsistentacrossmultiplecontrolledclinicalstudies AT bateyannette clinicalperformanceofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptusingtargetedcellfreednaanalysisinmaternalplasmawithmicroarraysornextgenerationsequencingngsisconsistentacrossmultiplecontrolledclinicalstudies AT jacobssonbo clinicalperformanceofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptusingtargetedcellfreednaanalysisinmaternalplasmawithmicroarraysornextgenerationsequencingngsisconsistentacrossmultiplecontrolledclinicalstudies AT brarherb clinicalperformanceofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptusingtargetedcellfreednaanalysisinmaternalplasmawithmicroarraysornextgenerationsequencingngsisconsistentacrossmultiplecontrolledclinicalstudies AT balanarasimhamadhumitha clinicalperformanceofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptusingtargetedcellfreednaanalysisinmaternalplasmawithmicroarraysornextgenerationsequencingngsisconsistentacrossmultiplecontrolledclinicalstudies AT hollemondesiree clinicalperformanceofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptusingtargetedcellfreednaanalysisinmaternalplasmawithmicroarraysornextgenerationsequencingngsisconsistentacrossmultiplecontrolledclinicalstudies AT sparksandrew clinicalperformanceofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptusingtargetedcellfreednaanalysisinmaternalplasmawithmicroarraysornextgenerationsequencingngsisconsistentacrossmultiplecontrolledclinicalstudies AT nicolaideskypros clinicalperformanceofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptusingtargetedcellfreednaanalysisinmaternalplasmawithmicroarraysornextgenerationsequencingngsisconsistentacrossmultiplecontrolledclinicalstudies AT muscithomasj clinicalperformanceofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptusingtargetedcellfreednaanalysisinmaternalplasmawithmicroarraysornextgenerationsequencingngsisconsistentacrossmultiplecontrolledclinicalstudies |