Cargando…

Regeneration versus scarring in vertebrate appendages and heart

Injuries to complex human organs, such as the limbs and the heart, result in pathological conditions, for which we often lack adequate treatments. While modern regenerative approaches are based on the transplantation of stem cell‐derived cells, natural regeneration in lower vertebrates, such as zebr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaźwińska, Anna, Sallin, Pauline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26414617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.4644
_version_ 1782459052428623872
author Jaźwińska, Anna
Sallin, Pauline
author_facet Jaźwińska, Anna
Sallin, Pauline
author_sort Jaźwińska, Anna
collection PubMed
description Injuries to complex human organs, such as the limbs and the heart, result in pathological conditions, for which we often lack adequate treatments. While modern regenerative approaches are based on the transplantation of stem cell‐derived cells, natural regeneration in lower vertebrates, such as zebrafish and newts, relies predominantly on the intrinsic plasticity of mature tissues. This property involves local activation of the remaining material at the site of injury to promote cell division, cell migration and complete reproduction of the missing structure. It remains an unresolved question why adult mammals are not equally competent to reactivate morphogenetic programmes. Although organ regeneration depends strongly on the proliferative properties of cells in the injured tissue, it is apparent that various organismic factors, such as innervation, vascularization, hormones, metabolism and the immune system, can affect this process. Here, we focus on a correlation between the regenerative capacity and cellular specialization in the context of functional demands, as illustrated by appendages and heart in diverse vertebrates. Elucidation of the differences between homologous regenerative and non‐regenerative tissues from various animal models is essential for understanding the applicability of lessons learned from the study of regenerative biology to clinical strategies for the treatment of injured human organs. © 2015 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5057359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50573592016-10-19 Regeneration versus scarring in vertebrate appendages and heart Jaźwińska, Anna Sallin, Pauline J Pathol Invited Reviews Injuries to complex human organs, such as the limbs and the heart, result in pathological conditions, for which we often lack adequate treatments. While modern regenerative approaches are based on the transplantation of stem cell‐derived cells, natural regeneration in lower vertebrates, such as zebrafish and newts, relies predominantly on the intrinsic plasticity of mature tissues. This property involves local activation of the remaining material at the site of injury to promote cell division, cell migration and complete reproduction of the missing structure. It remains an unresolved question why adult mammals are not equally competent to reactivate morphogenetic programmes. Although organ regeneration depends strongly on the proliferative properties of cells in the injured tissue, it is apparent that various organismic factors, such as innervation, vascularization, hormones, metabolism and the immune system, can affect this process. Here, we focus on a correlation between the regenerative capacity and cellular specialization in the context of functional demands, as illustrated by appendages and heart in diverse vertebrates. Elucidation of the differences between homologous regenerative and non‐regenerative tissues from various animal models is essential for understanding the applicability of lessons learned from the study of regenerative biology to clinical strategies for the treatment of injured human organs. © 2015 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-10-27 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5057359/ /pubmed/26414617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.4644 Text en © 2015 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Invited Reviews
Jaźwińska, Anna
Sallin, Pauline
Regeneration versus scarring in vertebrate appendages and heart
title Regeneration versus scarring in vertebrate appendages and heart
title_full Regeneration versus scarring in vertebrate appendages and heart
title_fullStr Regeneration versus scarring in vertebrate appendages and heart
title_full_unstemmed Regeneration versus scarring in vertebrate appendages and heart
title_short Regeneration versus scarring in vertebrate appendages and heart
title_sort regeneration versus scarring in vertebrate appendages and heart
topic Invited Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26414617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.4644
work_keys_str_mv AT jazwinskaanna regenerationversusscarringinvertebrateappendagesandheart
AT sallinpauline regenerationversusscarringinvertebrateappendagesandheart