Cargando…

Integrating and evaluating sex and gender in health research

Both sex (biological factors) and gender (socio-cultural factors) shape health. To produce the best possible health research evidence, it is essential to integrate sex and gender considerations throughout the research process. Despite growing recognition of the importance of these factors, progress...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Day, Suzanne, Mason, Robin, Lagosky, Stephanie, Rochon, Paula A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0147-7
_version_ 1782459055214690304
author Day, Suzanne
Mason, Robin
Lagosky, Stephanie
Rochon, Paula A.
author_facet Day, Suzanne
Mason, Robin
Lagosky, Stephanie
Rochon, Paula A.
author_sort Day, Suzanne
collection PubMed
description Both sex (biological factors) and gender (socio-cultural factors) shape health. To produce the best possible health research evidence, it is essential to integrate sex and gender considerations throughout the research process. Despite growing recognition of the importance of these factors, progress towards sex and gender integration as standard practice has been both slow and uneven in health research. In this commentary, we examine the challenges of integrating sex and gender from the research perspective, as well as strategies that can be used by researchers, funders and journal editors to address these challenges. Barriers to the integration of sex and gender in health research include problems with inconsistent terminology, difficulties in applying the concepts of sex and gender, failure to recognise the impact of sex and gender, and challenges with data collection and datasets. We analyse these barriers as strategic points of intervention for improving the integration of sex and gender at all stages of the research process. To assess the relative success of these strategies in any given study, researchers, funders and journal editors would benefit from a tool to evaluate the quality of sex and gender integration in order to establish benchmarks in research excellence. These assessment tools are needed now amidst growing institutional recognition that both sex and gender are necessary elements for advancing the quality and utility of health research evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5057373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50573732016-10-20 Integrating and evaluating sex and gender in health research Day, Suzanne Mason, Robin Lagosky, Stephanie Rochon, Paula A. Health Res Policy Syst Commentary Both sex (biological factors) and gender (socio-cultural factors) shape health. To produce the best possible health research evidence, it is essential to integrate sex and gender considerations throughout the research process. Despite growing recognition of the importance of these factors, progress towards sex and gender integration as standard practice has been both slow and uneven in health research. In this commentary, we examine the challenges of integrating sex and gender from the research perspective, as well as strategies that can be used by researchers, funders and journal editors to address these challenges. Barriers to the integration of sex and gender in health research include problems with inconsistent terminology, difficulties in applying the concepts of sex and gender, failure to recognise the impact of sex and gender, and challenges with data collection and datasets. We analyse these barriers as strategic points of intervention for improving the integration of sex and gender at all stages of the research process. To assess the relative success of these strategies in any given study, researchers, funders and journal editors would benefit from a tool to evaluate the quality of sex and gender integration in order to establish benchmarks in research excellence. These assessment tools are needed now amidst growing institutional recognition that both sex and gender are necessary elements for advancing the quality and utility of health research evidence. BioMed Central 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5057373/ /pubmed/27724961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0147-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Day, Suzanne
Mason, Robin
Lagosky, Stephanie
Rochon, Paula A.
Integrating and evaluating sex and gender in health research
title Integrating and evaluating sex and gender in health research
title_full Integrating and evaluating sex and gender in health research
title_fullStr Integrating and evaluating sex and gender in health research
title_full_unstemmed Integrating and evaluating sex and gender in health research
title_short Integrating and evaluating sex and gender in health research
title_sort integrating and evaluating sex and gender in health research
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0147-7
work_keys_str_mv AT daysuzanne integratingandevaluatingsexandgenderinhealthresearch
AT masonrobin integratingandevaluatingsexandgenderinhealthresearch
AT lagoskystephanie integratingandevaluatingsexandgenderinhealthresearch
AT rochonpaulaa integratingandevaluatingsexandgenderinhealthresearch