Cargando…
Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of latest generation automated attenuation-based tube potential selection (ATPS) impact on image quality and radiation dose in contrast-enhanced chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography examinations for gynaecologic cancer staging. METHODS: This IRB approved single-centre, obs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0093-1 |
_version_ | 1782459056843128832 |
---|---|
author | Park, Clara Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana Leithner, Doris Zierden, Amelie Albrecht, Mortiz H. Wichmann, Julian L. Bodelle, Boris Elsabaie, Mohamed Scholtz, Jan-Erik Kaup, Moritz Vogl, Thomas J. Beeres, Martin |
author_facet | Park, Clara Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana Leithner, Doris Zierden, Amelie Albrecht, Mortiz H. Wichmann, Julian L. Bodelle, Boris Elsabaie, Mohamed Scholtz, Jan-Erik Kaup, Moritz Vogl, Thomas J. Beeres, Martin |
author_sort | Park, Clara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evaluation of latest generation automated attenuation-based tube potential selection (ATPS) impact on image quality and radiation dose in contrast-enhanced chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography examinations for gynaecologic cancer staging. METHODS: This IRB approved single-centre, observer-blinded retrospective study with a waiver for informed consent included a total of 100 patients with contrast-enhanced chest-abdomen-pelvis CT for gynaecologic cancer staging. All patients were examined with activated ATPS for adaption of tube voltage to body habitus. 50 patients were scanned on a third-generation dual-source CT (DSCT), and another 50 patients on a second-generation DSCT. Predefined image quality setting remained stable between both groups at 120 kV and a current of 210 Reference mAs. Subjective image quality assessment was performed by two blinded readers independently. Attenuation and image noise were measured in several anatomic structures. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated. For the evaluation of radiation exposure, CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) values were compared. RESULTS: Diagnostic image quality was obtained in all patients. The median CTDI(vol) (6.1 mGy, range 3.9–22 mGy) was 40 % lower when using the algorithm compared with the previous ATCM protocol (median 10.2 mGy · cm, range 5.8–22.8 mGy). A reduction in potential to 90 kV occurred in 19 cases, a reduction to 100 kV in 23 patients and a reduction to 110 kV in 3 patients of our experimental cohort. These patients received significantly lower radiation exposure compared to the former used protocol. CONCLUSION: Latest generation automated ATPS on third-generation DSCT provides good diagnostic image quality in chest-abdomen-pelvis CT while average radiation dose is reduced by 40 % compared to former ATPS protocol on second-generation DSCT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5057380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50573802016-10-20 Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT Park, Clara Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana Leithner, Doris Zierden, Amelie Albrecht, Mortiz H. Wichmann, Julian L. Bodelle, Boris Elsabaie, Mohamed Scholtz, Jan-Erik Kaup, Moritz Vogl, Thomas J. Beeres, Martin Cancer Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Evaluation of latest generation automated attenuation-based tube potential selection (ATPS) impact on image quality and radiation dose in contrast-enhanced chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography examinations for gynaecologic cancer staging. METHODS: This IRB approved single-centre, observer-blinded retrospective study with a waiver for informed consent included a total of 100 patients with contrast-enhanced chest-abdomen-pelvis CT for gynaecologic cancer staging. All patients were examined with activated ATPS for adaption of tube voltage to body habitus. 50 patients were scanned on a third-generation dual-source CT (DSCT), and another 50 patients on a second-generation DSCT. Predefined image quality setting remained stable between both groups at 120 kV and a current of 210 Reference mAs. Subjective image quality assessment was performed by two blinded readers independently. Attenuation and image noise were measured in several anatomic structures. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated. For the evaluation of radiation exposure, CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) values were compared. RESULTS: Diagnostic image quality was obtained in all patients. The median CTDI(vol) (6.1 mGy, range 3.9–22 mGy) was 40 % lower when using the algorithm compared with the previous ATCM protocol (median 10.2 mGy · cm, range 5.8–22.8 mGy). A reduction in potential to 90 kV occurred in 19 cases, a reduction to 100 kV in 23 patients and a reduction to 110 kV in 3 patients of our experimental cohort. These patients received significantly lower radiation exposure compared to the former used protocol. CONCLUSION: Latest generation automated ATPS on third-generation DSCT provides good diagnostic image quality in chest-abdomen-pelvis CT while average radiation dose is reduced by 40 % compared to former ATPS protocol on second-generation DSCT. BioMed Central 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5057380/ /pubmed/27724954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0093-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Park, Clara Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana Leithner, Doris Zierden, Amelie Albrecht, Mortiz H. Wichmann, Julian L. Bodelle, Boris Elsabaie, Mohamed Scholtz, Jan-Erik Kaup, Moritz Vogl, Thomas J. Beeres, Martin Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT |
title | Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT |
title_full | Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT |
title_fullStr | Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT |
title_short | Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT |
title_sort | single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source ct system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source ct |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0093-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkclara singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect AT gruberrouhtatjana singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect AT leithnerdoris singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect AT zierdenamelie singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect AT albrechtmortizh singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect AT wichmannjulianl singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect AT bodelleboris singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect AT elsabaiemohamed singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect AT scholtzjanerik singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect AT kaupmoritz singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect AT voglthomasj singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect AT beeresmartin singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect |