Cargando…

Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of latest generation automated attenuation-based tube potential selection (ATPS) impact on image quality and radiation dose in contrast-enhanced chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography examinations for gynaecologic cancer staging. METHODS: This IRB approved single-centre, obs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Clara, Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana, Leithner, Doris, Zierden, Amelie, Albrecht, Mortiz H., Wichmann, Julian L., Bodelle, Boris, Elsabaie, Mohamed, Scholtz, Jan-Erik, Kaup, Moritz, Vogl, Thomas J., Beeres, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0093-1
_version_ 1782459056843128832
author Park, Clara
Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana
Leithner, Doris
Zierden, Amelie
Albrecht, Mortiz H.
Wichmann, Julian L.
Bodelle, Boris
Elsabaie, Mohamed
Scholtz, Jan-Erik
Kaup, Moritz
Vogl, Thomas J.
Beeres, Martin
author_facet Park, Clara
Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana
Leithner, Doris
Zierden, Amelie
Albrecht, Mortiz H.
Wichmann, Julian L.
Bodelle, Boris
Elsabaie, Mohamed
Scholtz, Jan-Erik
Kaup, Moritz
Vogl, Thomas J.
Beeres, Martin
author_sort Park, Clara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluation of latest generation automated attenuation-based tube potential selection (ATPS) impact on image quality and radiation dose in contrast-enhanced chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography examinations for gynaecologic cancer staging. METHODS: This IRB approved single-centre, observer-blinded retrospective study with a waiver for informed consent included a total of 100 patients with contrast-enhanced chest-abdomen-pelvis CT for gynaecologic cancer staging. All patients were examined with activated ATPS for adaption of tube voltage to body habitus. 50 patients were scanned on a third-generation dual-source CT (DSCT), and another 50 patients on a second-generation DSCT. Predefined image quality setting remained stable between both groups at 120 kV and a current of 210 Reference mAs. Subjective image quality assessment was performed by two blinded readers independently. Attenuation and image noise were measured in several anatomic structures. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated. For the evaluation of radiation exposure, CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) values were compared. RESULTS: Diagnostic image quality was obtained in all patients. The median CTDI(vol) (6.1 mGy, range 3.9–22 mGy) was 40 % lower when using the algorithm compared with the previous ATCM protocol (median 10.2 mGy · cm, range 5.8–22.8 mGy). A reduction in potential to 90 kV occurred in 19 cases, a reduction to 100 kV in 23 patients and a reduction to 110 kV in 3 patients of our experimental cohort. These patients received significantly lower radiation exposure compared to the former used protocol. CONCLUSION: Latest generation automated ATPS on third-generation DSCT provides good diagnostic image quality in chest-abdomen-pelvis CT while average radiation dose is reduced by 40 % compared to former ATPS protocol on second-generation DSCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5057380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50573802016-10-20 Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT Park, Clara Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana Leithner, Doris Zierden, Amelie Albrecht, Mortiz H. Wichmann, Julian L. Bodelle, Boris Elsabaie, Mohamed Scholtz, Jan-Erik Kaup, Moritz Vogl, Thomas J. Beeres, Martin Cancer Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Evaluation of latest generation automated attenuation-based tube potential selection (ATPS) impact on image quality and radiation dose in contrast-enhanced chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography examinations for gynaecologic cancer staging. METHODS: This IRB approved single-centre, observer-blinded retrospective study with a waiver for informed consent included a total of 100 patients with contrast-enhanced chest-abdomen-pelvis CT for gynaecologic cancer staging. All patients were examined with activated ATPS for adaption of tube voltage to body habitus. 50 patients were scanned on a third-generation dual-source CT (DSCT), and another 50 patients on a second-generation DSCT. Predefined image quality setting remained stable between both groups at 120 kV and a current of 210 Reference mAs. Subjective image quality assessment was performed by two blinded readers independently. Attenuation and image noise were measured in several anatomic structures. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated. For the evaluation of radiation exposure, CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) values were compared. RESULTS: Diagnostic image quality was obtained in all patients. The median CTDI(vol) (6.1 mGy, range 3.9–22 mGy) was 40 % lower when using the algorithm compared with the previous ATCM protocol (median 10.2 mGy · cm, range 5.8–22.8 mGy). A reduction in potential to 90 kV occurred in 19 cases, a reduction to 100 kV in 23 patients and a reduction to 110 kV in 3 patients of our experimental cohort. These patients received significantly lower radiation exposure compared to the former used protocol. CONCLUSION: Latest generation automated ATPS on third-generation DSCT provides good diagnostic image quality in chest-abdomen-pelvis CT while average radiation dose is reduced by 40 % compared to former ATPS protocol on second-generation DSCT. BioMed Central 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5057380/ /pubmed/27724954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0093-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Park, Clara
Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana
Leithner, Doris
Zierden, Amelie
Albrecht, Mortiz H.
Wichmann, Julian L.
Bodelle, Boris
Elsabaie, Mohamed
Scholtz, Jan-Erik
Kaup, Moritz
Vogl, Thomas J.
Beeres, Martin
Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT
title Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT
title_full Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT
title_fullStr Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT
title_full_unstemmed Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT
title_short Single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source CT system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source CT
title_sort single-source chest-abdomen-pelvis cancer staging on a third generation dual-source ct system: comparison of automated tube potential selection to second generation dual-source ct
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0093-1
work_keys_str_mv AT parkclara singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect
AT gruberrouhtatjana singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect
AT leithnerdoris singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect
AT zierdenamelie singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect
AT albrechtmortizh singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect
AT wichmannjulianl singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect
AT bodelleboris singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect
AT elsabaiemohamed singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect
AT scholtzjanerik singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect
AT kaupmoritz singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect
AT voglthomasj singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect
AT beeresmartin singlesourcechestabdomenpelviscancerstagingonathirdgenerationdualsourcectsystemcomparisonofautomatedtubepotentialselectiontosecondgenerationdualsourcect