Cargando…
Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices
BACKGROUND: Universities are significant contributors to research and technologies in health; however, the health needs of the world’s poor are historically neglected in research. Medical discoveries are frequently licensed exclusively to one producer, allowing a monopoly and inequitable pricing. Si...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0148-6 |
_version_ | 1782459059885047808 |
---|---|
author | Gotham, Dzintars Meldrum, Jonathan Nageshwaran, Vaitehi Counts, Christopher Kumari, Nina Martin, Manuel Beattie, Ben Post, Nathan |
author_facet | Gotham, Dzintars Meldrum, Jonathan Nageshwaran, Vaitehi Counts, Christopher Kumari, Nina Martin, Manuel Beattie, Ben Post, Nathan |
author_sort | Gotham, Dzintars |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Universities are significant contributors to research and technologies in health; however, the health needs of the world’s poor are historically neglected in research. Medical discoveries are frequently licensed exclusively to one producer, allowing a monopoly and inequitable pricing. Similarly, research is often published in ways that make it inaccessible. Universities can adopt policies and practices to overcome neglect and ensure equitable access to research and its products. METHODS: For 25 United Kingdom universities, data on health research funding were extracted from the top five United Kingdom funders’ databases and coded as research on neglected diseases (NDs) and/or health in low- and lower-middle-income countries (hLLMIC). Data on intellectual property licensing policies and practices and open-access policies were obtained from publicly available sources and by direct contact with universities. Proportions of research articles published as open-access were extracted from PubMed and PubMed Central. RESULTS: Across United Kingdom universities, the median proportion of 2011–2014 health research funds attributable to ND research was 2.6% and for hLLMIC it was 1.7%. Overall, 79% of all ND funding and 74% of hLLMIC funding were granted to the top four institutions within each category. Seven institutions had policies to ensure that technologies developed from their research are affordable globally. Mostly, universities licensed their inventions to third parties in a way that confers monopoly rights. Fifteen institutions had an institutional open-access publishing policy; three had an institutional open-access publishing fund. The proportion of health-related articles with full-text versions freely available online ranged from 58% to 100% across universities (2012–2013); 23% of articles also had a creative commons CC-BY license. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in the amount of global health research undertaken by United Kingdom universities, with a large proportion of total research funding awarded to a few institutions. To meet a level of research commitment in line with the global burden of disease, most universities should seek to expand their research activity. Most universities do not license their intellectual property in a way that is likely to encourage access in resource-poor settings, and lack policies to do so. The majority of recent research publications are published open-access, but not as gold standard (CC-BY) open-access. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0148-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5057402 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50574022016-10-20 Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices Gotham, Dzintars Meldrum, Jonathan Nageshwaran, Vaitehi Counts, Christopher Kumari, Nina Martin, Manuel Beattie, Ben Post, Nathan Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Universities are significant contributors to research and technologies in health; however, the health needs of the world’s poor are historically neglected in research. Medical discoveries are frequently licensed exclusively to one producer, allowing a monopoly and inequitable pricing. Similarly, research is often published in ways that make it inaccessible. Universities can adopt policies and practices to overcome neglect and ensure equitable access to research and its products. METHODS: For 25 United Kingdom universities, data on health research funding were extracted from the top five United Kingdom funders’ databases and coded as research on neglected diseases (NDs) and/or health in low- and lower-middle-income countries (hLLMIC). Data on intellectual property licensing policies and practices and open-access policies were obtained from publicly available sources and by direct contact with universities. Proportions of research articles published as open-access were extracted from PubMed and PubMed Central. RESULTS: Across United Kingdom universities, the median proportion of 2011–2014 health research funds attributable to ND research was 2.6% and for hLLMIC it was 1.7%. Overall, 79% of all ND funding and 74% of hLLMIC funding were granted to the top four institutions within each category. Seven institutions had policies to ensure that technologies developed from their research are affordable globally. Mostly, universities licensed their inventions to third parties in a way that confers monopoly rights. Fifteen institutions had an institutional open-access publishing policy; three had an institutional open-access publishing fund. The proportion of health-related articles with full-text versions freely available online ranged from 58% to 100% across universities (2012–2013); 23% of articles also had a creative commons CC-BY license. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in the amount of global health research undertaken by United Kingdom universities, with a large proportion of total research funding awarded to a few institutions. To meet a level of research commitment in line with the global burden of disease, most universities should seek to expand their research activity. Most universities do not license their intellectual property in a way that is likely to encourage access in resource-poor settings, and lack policies to do so. The majority of recent research publications are published open-access, but not as gold standard (CC-BY) open-access. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0148-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5057402/ /pubmed/27724907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0148-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Gotham, Dzintars Meldrum, Jonathan Nageshwaran, Vaitehi Counts, Christopher Kumari, Nina Martin, Manuel Beattie, Ben Post, Nathan Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices |
title | Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices |
title_full | Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices |
title_fullStr | Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices |
title_short | Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices |
title_sort | global health equity in united kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0148-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gothamdzintars globalhealthequityinunitedkingdomuniversityresearchalandscapeofcurrentpoliciesandpractices AT meldrumjonathan globalhealthequityinunitedkingdomuniversityresearchalandscapeofcurrentpoliciesandpractices AT nageshwaranvaitehi globalhealthequityinunitedkingdomuniversityresearchalandscapeofcurrentpoliciesandpractices AT countschristopher globalhealthequityinunitedkingdomuniversityresearchalandscapeofcurrentpoliciesandpractices AT kumarinina globalhealthequityinunitedkingdomuniversityresearchalandscapeofcurrentpoliciesandpractices AT martinmanuel globalhealthequityinunitedkingdomuniversityresearchalandscapeofcurrentpoliciesandpractices AT beattieben globalhealthequityinunitedkingdomuniversityresearchalandscapeofcurrentpoliciesandpractices AT postnathan globalhealthequityinunitedkingdomuniversityresearchalandscapeofcurrentpoliciesandpractices |