Cargando…

Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices

BACKGROUND: Universities are significant contributors to research and technologies in health; however, the health needs of the world’s poor are historically neglected in research. Medical discoveries are frequently licensed exclusively to one producer, allowing a monopoly and inequitable pricing. Si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gotham, Dzintars, Meldrum, Jonathan, Nageshwaran, Vaitehi, Counts, Christopher, Kumari, Nina, Martin, Manuel, Beattie, Ben, Post, Nathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0148-6
_version_ 1782459059885047808
author Gotham, Dzintars
Meldrum, Jonathan
Nageshwaran, Vaitehi
Counts, Christopher
Kumari, Nina
Martin, Manuel
Beattie, Ben
Post, Nathan
author_facet Gotham, Dzintars
Meldrum, Jonathan
Nageshwaran, Vaitehi
Counts, Christopher
Kumari, Nina
Martin, Manuel
Beattie, Ben
Post, Nathan
author_sort Gotham, Dzintars
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Universities are significant contributors to research and technologies in health; however, the health needs of the world’s poor are historically neglected in research. Medical discoveries are frequently licensed exclusively to one producer, allowing a monopoly and inequitable pricing. Similarly, research is often published in ways that make it inaccessible. Universities can adopt policies and practices to overcome neglect and ensure equitable access to research and its products. METHODS: For 25 United Kingdom universities, data on health research funding were extracted from the top five United Kingdom funders’ databases and coded as research on neglected diseases (NDs) and/or health in low- and lower-middle-income countries (hLLMIC). Data on intellectual property licensing policies and practices and open-access policies were obtained from publicly available sources and by direct contact with universities. Proportions of research articles published as open-access were extracted from PubMed and PubMed Central. RESULTS: Across United Kingdom universities, the median proportion of 2011–2014 health research funds attributable to ND research was 2.6% and for hLLMIC it was 1.7%. Overall, 79% of all ND funding and 74% of hLLMIC funding were granted to the top four institutions within each category. Seven institutions had policies to ensure that technologies developed from their research are affordable globally. Mostly, universities licensed their inventions to third parties in a way that confers monopoly rights. Fifteen institutions had an institutional open-access publishing policy; three had an institutional open-access publishing fund. The proportion of health-related articles with full-text versions freely available online ranged from 58% to 100% across universities (2012–2013); 23% of articles also had a creative commons CC-BY license. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in the amount of global health research undertaken by United Kingdom universities, with a large proportion of total research funding awarded to a few institutions. To meet a level of research commitment in line with the global burden of disease, most universities should seek to expand their research activity. Most universities do not license their intellectual property in a way that is likely to encourage access in resource-poor settings, and lack policies to do so. The majority of recent research publications are published open-access, but not as gold standard (CC-BY) open-access. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0148-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5057402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50574022016-10-20 Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices Gotham, Dzintars Meldrum, Jonathan Nageshwaran, Vaitehi Counts, Christopher Kumari, Nina Martin, Manuel Beattie, Ben Post, Nathan Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Universities are significant contributors to research and technologies in health; however, the health needs of the world’s poor are historically neglected in research. Medical discoveries are frequently licensed exclusively to one producer, allowing a monopoly and inequitable pricing. Similarly, research is often published in ways that make it inaccessible. Universities can adopt policies and practices to overcome neglect and ensure equitable access to research and its products. METHODS: For 25 United Kingdom universities, data on health research funding were extracted from the top five United Kingdom funders’ databases and coded as research on neglected diseases (NDs) and/or health in low- and lower-middle-income countries (hLLMIC). Data on intellectual property licensing policies and practices and open-access policies were obtained from publicly available sources and by direct contact with universities. Proportions of research articles published as open-access were extracted from PubMed and PubMed Central. RESULTS: Across United Kingdom universities, the median proportion of 2011–2014 health research funds attributable to ND research was 2.6% and for hLLMIC it was 1.7%. Overall, 79% of all ND funding and 74% of hLLMIC funding were granted to the top four institutions within each category. Seven institutions had policies to ensure that technologies developed from their research are affordable globally. Mostly, universities licensed their inventions to third parties in a way that confers monopoly rights. Fifteen institutions had an institutional open-access publishing policy; three had an institutional open-access publishing fund. The proportion of health-related articles with full-text versions freely available online ranged from 58% to 100% across universities (2012–2013); 23% of articles also had a creative commons CC-BY license. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in the amount of global health research undertaken by United Kingdom universities, with a large proportion of total research funding awarded to a few institutions. To meet a level of research commitment in line with the global burden of disease, most universities should seek to expand their research activity. Most universities do not license their intellectual property in a way that is likely to encourage access in resource-poor settings, and lack policies to do so. The majority of recent research publications are published open-access, but not as gold standard (CC-BY) open-access. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0148-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5057402/ /pubmed/27724907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0148-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Gotham, Dzintars
Meldrum, Jonathan
Nageshwaran, Vaitehi
Counts, Christopher
Kumari, Nina
Martin, Manuel
Beattie, Ben
Post, Nathan
Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices
title Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices
title_full Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices
title_fullStr Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices
title_full_unstemmed Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices
title_short Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices
title_sort global health equity in united kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0148-6
work_keys_str_mv AT gothamdzintars globalhealthequityinunitedkingdomuniversityresearchalandscapeofcurrentpoliciesandpractices
AT meldrumjonathan globalhealthequityinunitedkingdomuniversityresearchalandscapeofcurrentpoliciesandpractices
AT nageshwaranvaitehi globalhealthequityinunitedkingdomuniversityresearchalandscapeofcurrentpoliciesandpractices
AT countschristopher globalhealthequityinunitedkingdomuniversityresearchalandscapeofcurrentpoliciesandpractices
AT kumarinina globalhealthequityinunitedkingdomuniversityresearchalandscapeofcurrentpoliciesandpractices
AT martinmanuel globalhealthequityinunitedkingdomuniversityresearchalandscapeofcurrentpoliciesandpractices
AT beattieben globalhealthequityinunitedkingdomuniversityresearchalandscapeofcurrentpoliciesandpractices
AT postnathan globalhealthequityinunitedkingdomuniversityresearchalandscapeofcurrentpoliciesandpractices