Cargando…

A robot-based behavioural task to quantify impairments in rapid motor decisions and actions after stroke

BACKGROUND: Stroke can affect our ability to perform daily activities, although it can be difficult to identify the underlying functional impairment(s). Recent theories highlight the importance of sensory feedback in selecting future motor actions. This selection process can involve multiple process...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bourke, Teige C., Lowrey, Catherine R., Dukelow, Sean P., Bagg, Stephen D., Norman, Kathleen E., Scott, Stephen H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0201-2
_version_ 1782459060349566976
author Bourke, Teige C.
Lowrey, Catherine R.
Dukelow, Sean P.
Bagg, Stephen D.
Norman, Kathleen E.
Scott, Stephen H.
author_facet Bourke, Teige C.
Lowrey, Catherine R.
Dukelow, Sean P.
Bagg, Stephen D.
Norman, Kathleen E.
Scott, Stephen H.
author_sort Bourke, Teige C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stroke can affect our ability to perform daily activities, although it can be difficult to identify the underlying functional impairment(s). Recent theories highlight the importance of sensory feedback in selecting future motor actions. This selection process can involve multiple processes to achieve a behavioural goal, including selective attention, feature/object recognition, and movement inhibition. These functions are often impaired after stroke, but existing clinical measures tend to explore these processes in isolation and without time constraints. We sought to characterize patterns of post-stroke impairments in a dynamic situation where individuals must identify and select spatial targets rapidly in a motor task engaging both arms. Impairments in generating rapid motor decisions and actions could guide functional rehabilitation targets, and identify potential of individuals to perform daily activities such as driving. METHODS: Subjects were assessed in a robotic exoskeleton. Subjects used virtual paddles attached to their hands to hit away 200 virtual target objects falling towards them while avoiding 100 virtual distractors. The inclusion of distractor objects required subjects to rapidly assess objects located across the workspace and make motor decisions about which objects to hit. RESULTS: As many as 78 % of the 157 subjects with subacute stroke had impairments in individual global, spatial, temporal, or hand-specific task parameters relative to the 95 % performance bounds for 309 non-disabled control subjects. Subjects with stroke and neglect (Behavioural Inattention Test score <130; n = 28) were more often impaired in task parameters than other subjects with stroke. Approximately half of subjects with stroke hit proportionally more distractor objects than 95 % of controls, suggesting they had difficulty in attending to and selecting appropriate objects. This impairment was observed for affected and unaffected limbs including some whose motor performance was comparable to controls. The proportion of distractors hit also significantly correlated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores for subjects with stroke (r (s) < = − 0.48, P < 10(−9)). CONCLUSIONS: A simple robot-based task identified that many subjects with stroke have impairments in the rapid selection and generation of motor responses to task specific spatial goals in the workspace.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5057404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50574042016-10-20 A robot-based behavioural task to quantify impairments in rapid motor decisions and actions after stroke Bourke, Teige C. Lowrey, Catherine R. Dukelow, Sean P. Bagg, Stephen D. Norman, Kathleen E. Scott, Stephen H. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Stroke can affect our ability to perform daily activities, although it can be difficult to identify the underlying functional impairment(s). Recent theories highlight the importance of sensory feedback in selecting future motor actions. This selection process can involve multiple processes to achieve a behavioural goal, including selective attention, feature/object recognition, and movement inhibition. These functions are often impaired after stroke, but existing clinical measures tend to explore these processes in isolation and without time constraints. We sought to characterize patterns of post-stroke impairments in a dynamic situation where individuals must identify and select spatial targets rapidly in a motor task engaging both arms. Impairments in generating rapid motor decisions and actions could guide functional rehabilitation targets, and identify potential of individuals to perform daily activities such as driving. METHODS: Subjects were assessed in a robotic exoskeleton. Subjects used virtual paddles attached to their hands to hit away 200 virtual target objects falling towards them while avoiding 100 virtual distractors. The inclusion of distractor objects required subjects to rapidly assess objects located across the workspace and make motor decisions about which objects to hit. RESULTS: As many as 78 % of the 157 subjects with subacute stroke had impairments in individual global, spatial, temporal, or hand-specific task parameters relative to the 95 % performance bounds for 309 non-disabled control subjects. Subjects with stroke and neglect (Behavioural Inattention Test score <130; n = 28) were more often impaired in task parameters than other subjects with stroke. Approximately half of subjects with stroke hit proportionally more distractor objects than 95 % of controls, suggesting they had difficulty in attending to and selecting appropriate objects. This impairment was observed for affected and unaffected limbs including some whose motor performance was comparable to controls. The proportion of distractors hit also significantly correlated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores for subjects with stroke (r (s) < = − 0.48, P < 10(−9)). CONCLUSIONS: A simple robot-based task identified that many subjects with stroke have impairments in the rapid selection and generation of motor responses to task specific spatial goals in the workspace. BioMed Central 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5057404/ /pubmed/27724945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0201-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Bourke, Teige C.
Lowrey, Catherine R.
Dukelow, Sean P.
Bagg, Stephen D.
Norman, Kathleen E.
Scott, Stephen H.
A robot-based behavioural task to quantify impairments in rapid motor decisions and actions after stroke
title A robot-based behavioural task to quantify impairments in rapid motor decisions and actions after stroke
title_full A robot-based behavioural task to quantify impairments in rapid motor decisions and actions after stroke
title_fullStr A robot-based behavioural task to quantify impairments in rapid motor decisions and actions after stroke
title_full_unstemmed A robot-based behavioural task to quantify impairments in rapid motor decisions and actions after stroke
title_short A robot-based behavioural task to quantify impairments in rapid motor decisions and actions after stroke
title_sort robot-based behavioural task to quantify impairments in rapid motor decisions and actions after stroke
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0201-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bourketeigec arobotbasedbehaviouraltasktoquantifyimpairmentsinrapidmotordecisionsandactionsafterstroke
AT lowreycatheriner arobotbasedbehaviouraltasktoquantifyimpairmentsinrapidmotordecisionsandactionsafterstroke
AT dukelowseanp arobotbasedbehaviouraltasktoquantifyimpairmentsinrapidmotordecisionsandactionsafterstroke
AT baggstephend arobotbasedbehaviouraltasktoquantifyimpairmentsinrapidmotordecisionsandactionsafterstroke
AT normankathleene arobotbasedbehaviouraltasktoquantifyimpairmentsinrapidmotordecisionsandactionsafterstroke
AT scottstephenh arobotbasedbehaviouraltasktoquantifyimpairmentsinrapidmotordecisionsandactionsafterstroke
AT bourketeigec robotbasedbehaviouraltasktoquantifyimpairmentsinrapidmotordecisionsandactionsafterstroke
AT lowreycatheriner robotbasedbehaviouraltasktoquantifyimpairmentsinrapidmotordecisionsandactionsafterstroke
AT dukelowseanp robotbasedbehaviouraltasktoquantifyimpairmentsinrapidmotordecisionsandactionsafterstroke
AT baggstephend robotbasedbehaviouraltasktoquantifyimpairmentsinrapidmotordecisionsandactionsafterstroke
AT normankathleene robotbasedbehaviouraltasktoquantifyimpairmentsinrapidmotordecisionsandactionsafterstroke
AT scottstephenh robotbasedbehaviouraltasktoquantifyimpairmentsinrapidmotordecisionsandactionsafterstroke