Cargando…
Does cemented or cementless single-stage exchange arthroplasty of chronic periprosthetic hip infections provide similar infection rates to a two-stage? A systematic review
BACKGROUND: The best surgical modality for treating chronic periprosthetic hip infections remains controversial, with a lack of randomised controlled studies. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the infection recurrence rate after a single-stage versus a two-stage exchange arthroplasty,...
Autores principales: | George, D. A., Logoluso, N., Castellini, G., Gianola, S., Scarponi, S., Haddad, F. S., Drago, L., Romano, C. L. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1869-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
One-stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections
por: Nguyen, Manny, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Two-stage hip revision arthroplasty with a hexagonal modular cementless stem in cases of periprosthetic infection
por: Dieckmann, Ralf, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Revision in Cemented and Cementless Infected Hip Arthroplasty
por: Cherubino, Paolo, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Two-stage revision surgery with preformed spacers and cementless implants for septic hip arthritis: a prospective, non-randomized cohort study
por: Romanò, Carlo L, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
One-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Fistulizing Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip: An Effective Strategy
por: Marmor, Simon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)