Cargando…
Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
BACKGROUND: TP300, a recently developed synthetic camptothecin analogue, is a highly selective topoisomerase I inhibitor. A phase I study showed good safety and tolerability. As camptothecins have proven active in oesophago-gastric adenocarcinomas, in this phase II study we assessed the efficacy and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2828-6 |
_version_ | 1782459082911776768 |
---|---|
author | Propper, David Jones, Keith Anthoney, D. Alan Mansoor, Wasat Ford, Daniel Eatock, Martin Agarwal, Roshan Inatani, Michiyasu Saito, Tomohisa Abe, Masaichi Evans, T. R. Jeffry |
author_facet | Propper, David Jones, Keith Anthoney, D. Alan Mansoor, Wasat Ford, Daniel Eatock, Martin Agarwal, Roshan Inatani, Michiyasu Saito, Tomohisa Abe, Masaichi Evans, T. R. Jeffry |
author_sort | Propper, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: TP300, a recently developed synthetic camptothecin analogue, is a highly selective topoisomerase I inhibitor. A phase I study showed good safety and tolerability. As camptothecins have proven active in oesophago-gastric adenocarcinomas, in this phase II study we assessed the efficacy and safety of TP300 in patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Eligible patients had metastatic or locally advanced gastric or Siewert Types II or III GOJ inoperable adenocarcinoma. Patients were chemotherapy naïve unless this had been administered in the perioperative setting. TP300 was administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks (a cycle) for up to 6 cycles at a starting dose of 8 mg/m(2) with intra-patient escalation to 10 mg/m(2) from cycle 2 in the absence of dose-limiting toxicity. Tumour responses (RECIST 1.1) were assessed every 6 weeks. Toxicity was recorded by NCI-CTCAE version 3.0. Using a modified two-stage Simon design (Stage I and II), a total of 43 patients were to be included providing there were 3 of 18 patients with objective response in Stage I of the study. RESULTS: In Stage I of the study 20 patients (14 males, 6 females), median age 67 years (range 40 − 82), performance status ECOG 0/1, with GC [14] or GOJ carcinoma [6] were enrolled. Of the 16 evaluable patients, 11 received the planned dose increase to 10 mg/m(2) at cycle 2, 2 decreased to 6 mg/m(2), and 3 continued on 8 mg/m(2). There were no objective responses after 2 cycles of treatment. Twelve patients had stable disease for 1 − 5 months and 4 had progressive disease. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.1 months (CI [1.6 − 4.9]), median time to progression (TTP) was 2.9 months (CI [1.4 − 4.2]). Grade 3/4 toxicities (worst grade all cycles) included 7 patients (35 %) with neutropenia, 4 patients (20 %) with anaemia, 2 patients (10 %) with thrombocytopenia, and 3 patients (15 %) with fatigue. This study was terminated at the end of Stage I due to a lack of the required (3/18) responders. CONCLUSIONS: This study of TP300 showed good drug tolerability but it failed to demonstrate sufficient efficacy as measured by radiological response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU-CTR 2009-012097-12 2009-09-03 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5057500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50575002016-10-24 Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma Propper, David Jones, Keith Anthoney, D. Alan Mansoor, Wasat Ford, Daniel Eatock, Martin Agarwal, Roshan Inatani, Michiyasu Saito, Tomohisa Abe, Masaichi Evans, T. R. Jeffry BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: TP300, a recently developed synthetic camptothecin analogue, is a highly selective topoisomerase I inhibitor. A phase I study showed good safety and tolerability. As camptothecins have proven active in oesophago-gastric adenocarcinomas, in this phase II study we assessed the efficacy and safety of TP300 in patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Eligible patients had metastatic or locally advanced gastric or Siewert Types II or III GOJ inoperable adenocarcinoma. Patients were chemotherapy naïve unless this had been administered in the perioperative setting. TP300 was administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks (a cycle) for up to 6 cycles at a starting dose of 8 mg/m(2) with intra-patient escalation to 10 mg/m(2) from cycle 2 in the absence of dose-limiting toxicity. Tumour responses (RECIST 1.1) were assessed every 6 weeks. Toxicity was recorded by NCI-CTCAE version 3.0. Using a modified two-stage Simon design (Stage I and II), a total of 43 patients were to be included providing there were 3 of 18 patients with objective response in Stage I of the study. RESULTS: In Stage I of the study 20 patients (14 males, 6 females), median age 67 years (range 40 − 82), performance status ECOG 0/1, with GC [14] or GOJ carcinoma [6] were enrolled. Of the 16 evaluable patients, 11 received the planned dose increase to 10 mg/m(2) at cycle 2, 2 decreased to 6 mg/m(2), and 3 continued on 8 mg/m(2). There were no objective responses after 2 cycles of treatment. Twelve patients had stable disease for 1 − 5 months and 4 had progressive disease. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.1 months (CI [1.6 − 4.9]), median time to progression (TTP) was 2.9 months (CI [1.4 − 4.2]). Grade 3/4 toxicities (worst grade all cycles) included 7 patients (35 %) with neutropenia, 4 patients (20 %) with anaemia, 2 patients (10 %) with thrombocytopenia, and 3 patients (15 %) with fatigue. This study was terminated at the end of Stage I due to a lack of the required (3/18) responders. CONCLUSIONS: This study of TP300 showed good drug tolerability but it failed to demonstrate sufficient efficacy as measured by radiological response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU-CTR 2009-012097-12 2009-09-03 BioMed Central 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5057500/ /pubmed/27724887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2828-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Propper, David Jones, Keith Anthoney, D. Alan Mansoor, Wasat Ford, Daniel Eatock, Martin Agarwal, Roshan Inatani, Michiyasu Saito, Tomohisa Abe, Masaichi Evans, T. R. Jeffry Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma |
title | Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma |
title_full | Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma |
title_short | Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma |
title_sort | phase ii study of tp300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2828-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT propperdavid phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma AT joneskeith phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma AT anthoneydalan phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma AT mansoorwasat phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma AT forddaniel phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma AT eatockmartin phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma AT agarwalroshan phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma AT inatanimichiyasu phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma AT saitotomohisa phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma AT abemasaichi phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma AT evanstrjeffry phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma |