Cargando…

Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: TP300, a recently developed synthetic camptothecin analogue, is a highly selective topoisomerase I inhibitor. A phase I study showed good safety and tolerability. As camptothecins have proven active in oesophago-gastric adenocarcinomas, in this phase II study we assessed the efficacy and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Propper, David, Jones, Keith, Anthoney, D. Alan, Mansoor, Wasat, Ford, Daniel, Eatock, Martin, Agarwal, Roshan, Inatani, Michiyasu, Saito, Tomohisa, Abe, Masaichi, Evans, T. R. Jeffry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2828-6
_version_ 1782459082911776768
author Propper, David
Jones, Keith
Anthoney, D. Alan
Mansoor, Wasat
Ford, Daniel
Eatock, Martin
Agarwal, Roshan
Inatani, Michiyasu
Saito, Tomohisa
Abe, Masaichi
Evans, T. R. Jeffry
author_facet Propper, David
Jones, Keith
Anthoney, D. Alan
Mansoor, Wasat
Ford, Daniel
Eatock, Martin
Agarwal, Roshan
Inatani, Michiyasu
Saito, Tomohisa
Abe, Masaichi
Evans, T. R. Jeffry
author_sort Propper, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: TP300, a recently developed synthetic camptothecin analogue, is a highly selective topoisomerase I inhibitor. A phase I study showed good safety and tolerability. As camptothecins have proven active in oesophago-gastric adenocarcinomas, in this phase II study we assessed the efficacy and safety of TP300 in patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Eligible patients had metastatic or locally advanced gastric or Siewert Types II or III GOJ inoperable adenocarcinoma. Patients were chemotherapy naïve unless this had been administered in the perioperative setting. TP300 was administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks (a cycle) for up to 6 cycles at a starting dose of 8 mg/m(2) with intra-patient escalation to 10 mg/m(2) from cycle 2 in the absence of dose-limiting toxicity. Tumour responses (RECIST 1.1) were assessed every 6 weeks. Toxicity was recorded by NCI-CTCAE version 3.0. Using a modified two-stage Simon design (Stage I and II), a total of 43 patients were to be included providing there were 3 of 18 patients with objective response in Stage I of the study. RESULTS: In Stage I of the study 20 patients (14 males, 6 females), median age 67 years (range 40 − 82), performance status ECOG 0/1, with GC [14] or GOJ carcinoma [6] were enrolled. Of the 16 evaluable patients, 11 received the planned dose increase to 10 mg/m(2) at cycle 2, 2 decreased to 6 mg/m(2), and 3 continued on 8 mg/m(2). There were no objective responses after 2 cycles of treatment. Twelve patients had stable disease for 1 − 5 months and 4 had progressive disease. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.1 months (CI [1.6 − 4.9]), median time to progression (TTP) was 2.9 months (CI [1.4 − 4.2]). Grade 3/4 toxicities (worst grade all cycles) included 7 patients (35 %) with neutropenia, 4 patients (20 %) with anaemia, 2 patients (10 %) with thrombocytopenia, and 3 patients (15 %) with fatigue. This study was terminated at the end of Stage I due to a lack of the required (3/18) responders. CONCLUSIONS: This study of TP300 showed good drug tolerability but it failed to demonstrate sufficient efficacy as measured by radiological response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU-CTR 2009-012097-12 2009-09-03
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5057500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50575002016-10-24 Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma Propper, David Jones, Keith Anthoney, D. Alan Mansoor, Wasat Ford, Daniel Eatock, Martin Agarwal, Roshan Inatani, Michiyasu Saito, Tomohisa Abe, Masaichi Evans, T. R. Jeffry BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: TP300, a recently developed synthetic camptothecin analogue, is a highly selective topoisomerase I inhibitor. A phase I study showed good safety and tolerability. As camptothecins have proven active in oesophago-gastric adenocarcinomas, in this phase II study we assessed the efficacy and safety of TP300 in patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Eligible patients had metastatic or locally advanced gastric or Siewert Types II or III GOJ inoperable adenocarcinoma. Patients were chemotherapy naïve unless this had been administered in the perioperative setting. TP300 was administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks (a cycle) for up to 6 cycles at a starting dose of 8 mg/m(2) with intra-patient escalation to 10 mg/m(2) from cycle 2 in the absence of dose-limiting toxicity. Tumour responses (RECIST 1.1) were assessed every 6 weeks. Toxicity was recorded by NCI-CTCAE version 3.0. Using a modified two-stage Simon design (Stage I and II), a total of 43 patients were to be included providing there were 3 of 18 patients with objective response in Stage I of the study. RESULTS: In Stage I of the study 20 patients (14 males, 6 females), median age 67 years (range 40 − 82), performance status ECOG 0/1, with GC [14] or GOJ carcinoma [6] were enrolled. Of the 16 evaluable patients, 11 received the planned dose increase to 10 mg/m(2) at cycle 2, 2 decreased to 6 mg/m(2), and 3 continued on 8 mg/m(2). There were no objective responses after 2 cycles of treatment. Twelve patients had stable disease for 1 − 5 months and 4 had progressive disease. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.1 months (CI [1.6 − 4.9]), median time to progression (TTP) was 2.9 months (CI [1.4 − 4.2]). Grade 3/4 toxicities (worst grade all cycles) included 7 patients (35 %) with neutropenia, 4 patients (20 %) with anaemia, 2 patients (10 %) with thrombocytopenia, and 3 patients (15 %) with fatigue. This study was terminated at the end of Stage I due to a lack of the required (3/18) responders. CONCLUSIONS: This study of TP300 showed good drug tolerability but it failed to demonstrate sufficient efficacy as measured by radiological response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU-CTR 2009-012097-12 2009-09-03 BioMed Central 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5057500/ /pubmed/27724887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2828-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Propper, David
Jones, Keith
Anthoney, D. Alan
Mansoor, Wasat
Ford, Daniel
Eatock, Martin
Agarwal, Roshan
Inatani, Michiyasu
Saito, Tomohisa
Abe, Masaichi
Evans, T. R. Jeffry
Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
title Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
title_full Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
title_short Phase II study of TP300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
title_sort phase ii study of tp300 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5057500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27724887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2828-6
work_keys_str_mv AT propperdavid phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma
AT joneskeith phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma
AT anthoneydalan phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma
AT mansoorwasat phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma
AT forddaniel phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma
AT eatockmartin phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma
AT agarwalroshan phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma
AT inatanimichiyasu phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma
AT saitotomohisa phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma
AT abemasaichi phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma
AT evanstrjeffry phaseiistudyoftp300inpatientswithadvancedgastricorgastrooesophagealjunctionadenocarcinoma