Cargando…

The proportion of impervious surfaces at the landscape scale structures wild bee assemblages in a densely populated region

Given the predicted expansion of cities throughout the world, understanding the effect of urbanization on bee fauna is a major issue for the conservation of bees. The aim of this study was to understand how urbanization affects wild bee assemblages along a gradient of impervious surfaces and to dete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geslin, Benoît, Le Féon, Violette, Folschweiller, Morgane, Flacher, Floriane, Carmignac, David, Motard, Eric, Perret, Samuel, Dajoz, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5058531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27777733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2374
_version_ 1782459256810766336
author Geslin, Benoît
Le Féon, Violette
Folschweiller, Morgane
Flacher, Floriane
Carmignac, David
Motard, Eric
Perret, Samuel
Dajoz, Isabelle
author_facet Geslin, Benoît
Le Féon, Violette
Folschweiller, Morgane
Flacher, Floriane
Carmignac, David
Motard, Eric
Perret, Samuel
Dajoz, Isabelle
author_sort Geslin, Benoît
collection PubMed
description Given the predicted expansion of cities throughout the world, understanding the effect of urbanization on bee fauna is a major issue for the conservation of bees. The aim of this study was to understand how urbanization affects wild bee assemblages along a gradient of impervious surfaces and to determine the influence of landscape composition and floral resource availability on these assemblages. We chose 12 sites with a proportion of impervious surfaces (soil covered by parking, roads, and buildings) ranging from 0.06% to 64.31% within a 500 m radius. We collected using pan trapping and estimated the landscape composition of the sites within a 500 m radius and the species richness of plant assemblages within a 200 m radius. We collected 1104 bees from 74 species. The proportion of impervious surfaces at the landscape scale had a negative effect on wild bee abundance and species richness, whereas local flower composition had no effect. Ground‐nesting bees were particularly sensitive to the urbanization gradient. This study provides new evidences of the impact of urbanization on bee assemblages and the proportion of impervious surfaces at the landscape scale emerged as a key factor that drives those assemblages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5058531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50585312016-10-24 The proportion of impervious surfaces at the landscape scale structures wild bee assemblages in a densely populated region Geslin, Benoît Le Féon, Violette Folschweiller, Morgane Flacher, Floriane Carmignac, David Motard, Eric Perret, Samuel Dajoz, Isabelle Ecol Evol Original Research Given the predicted expansion of cities throughout the world, understanding the effect of urbanization on bee fauna is a major issue for the conservation of bees. The aim of this study was to understand how urbanization affects wild bee assemblages along a gradient of impervious surfaces and to determine the influence of landscape composition and floral resource availability on these assemblages. We chose 12 sites with a proportion of impervious surfaces (soil covered by parking, roads, and buildings) ranging from 0.06% to 64.31% within a 500 m radius. We collected using pan trapping and estimated the landscape composition of the sites within a 500 m radius and the species richness of plant assemblages within a 200 m radius. We collected 1104 bees from 74 species. The proportion of impervious surfaces at the landscape scale had a negative effect on wild bee abundance and species richness, whereas local flower composition had no effect. Ground‐nesting bees were particularly sensitive to the urbanization gradient. This study provides new evidences of the impact of urbanization on bee assemblages and the proportion of impervious surfaces at the landscape scale emerged as a key factor that drives those assemblages. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5058531/ /pubmed/27777733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2374 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Geslin, Benoît
Le Féon, Violette
Folschweiller, Morgane
Flacher, Floriane
Carmignac, David
Motard, Eric
Perret, Samuel
Dajoz, Isabelle
The proportion of impervious surfaces at the landscape scale structures wild bee assemblages in a densely populated region
title The proportion of impervious surfaces at the landscape scale structures wild bee assemblages in a densely populated region
title_full The proportion of impervious surfaces at the landscape scale structures wild bee assemblages in a densely populated region
title_fullStr The proportion of impervious surfaces at the landscape scale structures wild bee assemblages in a densely populated region
title_full_unstemmed The proportion of impervious surfaces at the landscape scale structures wild bee assemblages in a densely populated region
title_short The proportion of impervious surfaces at the landscape scale structures wild bee assemblages in a densely populated region
title_sort proportion of impervious surfaces at the landscape scale structures wild bee assemblages in a densely populated region
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5058531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27777733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2374
work_keys_str_mv AT geslinbenoit theproportionofimpervioussurfacesatthelandscapescalestructureswildbeeassemblagesinadenselypopulatedregion
AT lefeonviolette theproportionofimpervioussurfacesatthelandscapescalestructureswildbeeassemblagesinadenselypopulatedregion
AT folschweillermorgane theproportionofimpervioussurfacesatthelandscapescalestructureswildbeeassemblagesinadenselypopulatedregion
AT flacherfloriane theproportionofimpervioussurfacesatthelandscapescalestructureswildbeeassemblagesinadenselypopulatedregion
AT carmignacdavid theproportionofimpervioussurfacesatthelandscapescalestructureswildbeeassemblagesinadenselypopulatedregion
AT motarderic theproportionofimpervioussurfacesatthelandscapescalestructureswildbeeassemblagesinadenselypopulatedregion
AT perretsamuel theproportionofimpervioussurfacesatthelandscapescalestructureswildbeeassemblagesinadenselypopulatedregion
AT dajozisabelle theproportionofimpervioussurfacesatthelandscapescalestructureswildbeeassemblagesinadenselypopulatedregion
AT geslinbenoit proportionofimpervioussurfacesatthelandscapescalestructureswildbeeassemblagesinadenselypopulatedregion
AT lefeonviolette proportionofimpervioussurfacesatthelandscapescalestructureswildbeeassemblagesinadenselypopulatedregion
AT folschweillermorgane proportionofimpervioussurfacesatthelandscapescalestructureswildbeeassemblagesinadenselypopulatedregion
AT flacherfloriane proportionofimpervioussurfacesatthelandscapescalestructureswildbeeassemblagesinadenselypopulatedregion
AT carmignacdavid proportionofimpervioussurfacesatthelandscapescalestructureswildbeeassemblagesinadenselypopulatedregion
AT motarderic proportionofimpervioussurfacesatthelandscapescalestructureswildbeeassemblagesinadenselypopulatedregion
AT perretsamuel proportionofimpervioussurfacesatthelandscapescalestructureswildbeeassemblagesinadenselypopulatedregion
AT dajozisabelle proportionofimpervioussurfacesatthelandscapescalestructureswildbeeassemblagesinadenselypopulatedregion