Cargando…

Phylogenetic comparisons of pedestrian locomotion costs: confirmations and new insights

The energetic costs for animals to locomote on land influence many aspects of their ecology. Size accounts for much of the among‐species variation in terrestrial transport costs, but species of similar body size can still exhibit severalfold differences in energy expenditure. We compiled measurement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: White, Craig R., Alton, Lesley A., Crispin, Taryn S., Halsey, Lewis G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5058540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27777742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2267
_version_ 1782459258890092544
author White, Craig R.
Alton, Lesley A.
Crispin, Taryn S.
Halsey, Lewis G.
author_facet White, Craig R.
Alton, Lesley A.
Crispin, Taryn S.
Halsey, Lewis G.
author_sort White, Craig R.
collection PubMed
description The energetic costs for animals to locomote on land influence many aspects of their ecology. Size accounts for much of the among‐species variation in terrestrial transport costs, but species of similar body size can still exhibit severalfold differences in energy expenditure. We compiled measurements of the (mass‐specific) minimum cost of pedestrian transport (COT(min), mL/kg/m) for 201 species – by far the largest sample to date – and used phylogenetically informed comparative analyses to investigate possible eco‐evolutionary differences in COT(min) between various groupings of those species. We investigated number of legs, ectothermy and endothermy, waddling, and nocturnality specifically in lizards. Thus, our study primarily revisited previous theories about variations in COT(min) between species, testing them with much more robust analyses. Having accounted for mass, while residual COT(min) did not differ between bipedal and other species, specifically waddling bipeds were found to have relatively high COT(min). Furthermore, nocturnal lizards have relatively low COT(min) although temperature does not appear to affect COT(min) in ectotherms. Previous studies examining across‐species variation in COT(min) from a biomechanical perspective show that the differences between waddling birds and nonwaddling species, and between nocturnal lizards and other ecotherms, are likely to be attributable to differences in ground reaction forces, posture, and effective limb length.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5058540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50585402016-10-24 Phylogenetic comparisons of pedestrian locomotion costs: confirmations and new insights White, Craig R. Alton, Lesley A. Crispin, Taryn S. Halsey, Lewis G. Ecol Evol Original Research The energetic costs for animals to locomote on land influence many aspects of their ecology. Size accounts for much of the among‐species variation in terrestrial transport costs, but species of similar body size can still exhibit severalfold differences in energy expenditure. We compiled measurements of the (mass‐specific) minimum cost of pedestrian transport (COT(min), mL/kg/m) for 201 species – by far the largest sample to date – and used phylogenetically informed comparative analyses to investigate possible eco‐evolutionary differences in COT(min) between various groupings of those species. We investigated number of legs, ectothermy and endothermy, waddling, and nocturnality specifically in lizards. Thus, our study primarily revisited previous theories about variations in COT(min) between species, testing them with much more robust analyses. Having accounted for mass, while residual COT(min) did not differ between bipedal and other species, specifically waddling bipeds were found to have relatively high COT(min). Furthermore, nocturnal lizards have relatively low COT(min) although temperature does not appear to affect COT(min) in ectotherms. Previous studies examining across‐species variation in COT(min) from a biomechanical perspective show that the differences between waddling birds and nonwaddling species, and between nocturnal lizards and other ecotherms, are likely to be attributable to differences in ground reaction forces, posture, and effective limb length. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5058540/ /pubmed/27777742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2267 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
White, Craig R.
Alton, Lesley A.
Crispin, Taryn S.
Halsey, Lewis G.
Phylogenetic comparisons of pedestrian locomotion costs: confirmations and new insights
title Phylogenetic comparisons of pedestrian locomotion costs: confirmations and new insights
title_full Phylogenetic comparisons of pedestrian locomotion costs: confirmations and new insights
title_fullStr Phylogenetic comparisons of pedestrian locomotion costs: confirmations and new insights
title_full_unstemmed Phylogenetic comparisons of pedestrian locomotion costs: confirmations and new insights
title_short Phylogenetic comparisons of pedestrian locomotion costs: confirmations and new insights
title_sort phylogenetic comparisons of pedestrian locomotion costs: confirmations and new insights
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5058540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27777742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2267
work_keys_str_mv AT whitecraigr phylogeneticcomparisonsofpedestrianlocomotioncostsconfirmationsandnewinsights
AT altonlesleya phylogeneticcomparisonsofpedestrianlocomotioncostsconfirmationsandnewinsights
AT crispintaryns phylogeneticcomparisonsofpedestrianlocomotioncostsconfirmationsandnewinsights
AT halseylewisg phylogeneticcomparisonsofpedestrianlocomotioncostsconfirmationsandnewinsights