Cargando…

Regulatory T Cell Responses in Participants with Type 1 Diabetes after a Single Dose of Interleukin-2: A Non-Randomised, Open Label, Adaptive Dose-Finding Trial

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-2 (IL-2) has an essential role in the expansion and function of CD4(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs). Tregs reduce tissue damage by limiting the immune response following infection and regulate autoreactive CD4(+) effector T cells (Teffs) to prevent autoimmune diseases, such as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Todd, John A., Evangelou, Marina, Cutler, Antony J., Pekalski, Marcin L., Walker, Neil M., Stevens, Helen E., Porter, Linsey, Smyth, Deborah J., Rainbow, Daniel B., Ferreira, Ricardo C., Esposito, Laura, Hunter, Kara M. D., Loudon, Kevin, Irons, Kathryn, Yang, Jennie H., Bell, Charles J. M., Schuilenburg, Helen, Heywood, James, Challis, Ben, Neupane, Sankalpa, Clarke, Pamela, Coleman, Gillian, Dawson, Sarah, Goymer, Donna, Anselmiova, Katerina, Kennet, Jane, Brown, Judy, Caddy, Sarah L., Lu, Jia, Greatorex, Jane, Goodfellow, Ian, Wallace, Chris, Tree, Tim I., Evans, Mark, Mander, Adrian P., Bond, Simon, Wicker, Linda S., Waldron-Lynch, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5058548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27727279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002139
_version_ 1782459260871901184
author Todd, John A.
Evangelou, Marina
Cutler, Antony J.
Pekalski, Marcin L.
Walker, Neil M.
Stevens, Helen E.
Porter, Linsey
Smyth, Deborah J.
Rainbow, Daniel B.
Ferreira, Ricardo C.
Esposito, Laura
Hunter, Kara M. D.
Loudon, Kevin
Irons, Kathryn
Yang, Jennie H.
Bell, Charles J. M.
Schuilenburg, Helen
Heywood, James
Challis, Ben
Neupane, Sankalpa
Clarke, Pamela
Coleman, Gillian
Dawson, Sarah
Goymer, Donna
Anselmiova, Katerina
Kennet, Jane
Brown, Judy
Caddy, Sarah L.
Lu, Jia
Greatorex, Jane
Goodfellow, Ian
Wallace, Chris
Tree, Tim I.
Evans, Mark
Mander, Adrian P.
Bond, Simon
Wicker, Linda S.
Waldron-Lynch, Frank
author_facet Todd, John A.
Evangelou, Marina
Cutler, Antony J.
Pekalski, Marcin L.
Walker, Neil M.
Stevens, Helen E.
Porter, Linsey
Smyth, Deborah J.
Rainbow, Daniel B.
Ferreira, Ricardo C.
Esposito, Laura
Hunter, Kara M. D.
Loudon, Kevin
Irons, Kathryn
Yang, Jennie H.
Bell, Charles J. M.
Schuilenburg, Helen
Heywood, James
Challis, Ben
Neupane, Sankalpa
Clarke, Pamela
Coleman, Gillian
Dawson, Sarah
Goymer, Donna
Anselmiova, Katerina
Kennet, Jane
Brown, Judy
Caddy, Sarah L.
Lu, Jia
Greatorex, Jane
Goodfellow, Ian
Wallace, Chris
Tree, Tim I.
Evans, Mark
Mander, Adrian P.
Bond, Simon
Wicker, Linda S.
Waldron-Lynch, Frank
author_sort Todd, John A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Interleukin-2 (IL-2) has an essential role in the expansion and function of CD4(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs). Tregs reduce tissue damage by limiting the immune response following infection and regulate autoreactive CD4(+) effector T cells (Teffs) to prevent autoimmune diseases, such as type 1 diabetes (T1D). Genetic susceptibility to T1D causes alterations in the IL-2 pathway, a finding that supports Tregs as a cellular therapeutic target. Aldesleukin (Proleukin; recombinant human IL-2), which is administered at high doses to activate the immune system in cancer immunotherapy, is now being repositioned to treat inflammatory and autoimmune disorders at lower doses by targeting Tregs. METHODS AND FINDINGS: To define the aldesleukin dose response for Tregs and to find doses that increase Tregs physiologically for treatment of T1D, a statistical and systematic approach was taken by analysing the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single doses of subcutaneous aldesleukin in the Adaptive Study of IL-2 Dose on Regulatory T Cells in Type 1 Diabetes (DILT1D), a single centre, non-randomised, open label, adaptive dose-finding trial with 40 adult participants with recently diagnosed T1D. The primary endpoint was the maximum percentage increase in Tregs (defined as CD3(+)CD4(+)CD25(high)CD127(low)) from the baseline frequency in each participant measured over the 7 d following treatment. There was an initial learning phase with five pairs of participants, each pair receiving one of five pre-assigned single doses from 0.04 × 10(6) to 1.5 × 10(6) IU/m(2), in order to model the dose-response curve. Results from each participant were then incorporated into interim statistical modelling to target the two doses most likely to induce 10% and 20% increases in Treg frequencies. Primary analysis of the evaluable population (n = 39) found that the optimal doses of aldesleukin to induce 10% and 20% increases in Tregs were 0.101 × 10(6) IU/m(2) (standard error [SE] = 0.078, 95% CI = −0.052, 0.254) and 0.497 × 10(6) IU/m(2) (SE = 0.092, 95% CI = 0.316, 0.678), respectively. On analysis of secondary outcomes, using a highly sensitive IL-2 assay, the observed plasma concentrations of the drug at 90 min exceeded the hypothetical Treg-specific therapeutic window determined in vitro (0.015–0.24 IU/ml), even at the lowest doses (0.040 × 10(6) and 0.045 × 10(6) IU/m(2)) administered. A rapid decrease in Treg frequency in the circulation was observed at 90 min and at day 1, which was dose dependent (mean decrease 11.6%, SE = 2.3%, range 10.0%–48.2%, n = 37), rebounding at day 2 and increasing to frequencies above baseline over 7 d. Teffs, natural killer cells, and eosinophils also responded, with their frequencies rapidly and dose-dependently decreased in the blood, then returning to, or exceeding, pretreatment levels. Furthermore, there was a dose-dependent down modulation of one of the two signalling subunits of the IL-2 receptor, the β chain (CD122) (mean decrease = 58.0%, SE = 2.8%, range 9.8%–85.5%, n = 33), on Tregs and a reduction in their sensitivity to aldesleukin at 90 min and day 1 and 2 post-treatment. Due to blood volume requirements as well as ethical and practical considerations, the study was limited to adults and to analysis of peripheral blood only. CONCLUSIONS: The DILT1D trial results, most notably the early altered trafficking and desensitisation of Tregs induced by a single ultra-low dose of aldesleukin that resolves within 2–3 d, inform the design of the next trial to determine a repeat dosing regimen aimed at establishing a steady-state Treg frequency increase of 20%–50%, with the eventual goal of preventing T1D. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN27852285; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01827735
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5058548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50585482016-10-27 Regulatory T Cell Responses in Participants with Type 1 Diabetes after a Single Dose of Interleukin-2: A Non-Randomised, Open Label, Adaptive Dose-Finding Trial Todd, John A. Evangelou, Marina Cutler, Antony J. Pekalski, Marcin L. Walker, Neil M. Stevens, Helen E. Porter, Linsey Smyth, Deborah J. Rainbow, Daniel B. Ferreira, Ricardo C. Esposito, Laura Hunter, Kara M. D. Loudon, Kevin Irons, Kathryn Yang, Jennie H. Bell, Charles J. M. Schuilenburg, Helen Heywood, James Challis, Ben Neupane, Sankalpa Clarke, Pamela Coleman, Gillian Dawson, Sarah Goymer, Donna Anselmiova, Katerina Kennet, Jane Brown, Judy Caddy, Sarah L. Lu, Jia Greatorex, Jane Goodfellow, Ian Wallace, Chris Tree, Tim I. Evans, Mark Mander, Adrian P. Bond, Simon Wicker, Linda S. Waldron-Lynch, Frank PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Interleukin-2 (IL-2) has an essential role in the expansion and function of CD4(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs). Tregs reduce tissue damage by limiting the immune response following infection and regulate autoreactive CD4(+) effector T cells (Teffs) to prevent autoimmune diseases, such as type 1 diabetes (T1D). Genetic susceptibility to T1D causes alterations in the IL-2 pathway, a finding that supports Tregs as a cellular therapeutic target. Aldesleukin (Proleukin; recombinant human IL-2), which is administered at high doses to activate the immune system in cancer immunotherapy, is now being repositioned to treat inflammatory and autoimmune disorders at lower doses by targeting Tregs. METHODS AND FINDINGS: To define the aldesleukin dose response for Tregs and to find doses that increase Tregs physiologically for treatment of T1D, a statistical and systematic approach was taken by analysing the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single doses of subcutaneous aldesleukin in the Adaptive Study of IL-2 Dose on Regulatory T Cells in Type 1 Diabetes (DILT1D), a single centre, non-randomised, open label, adaptive dose-finding trial with 40 adult participants with recently diagnosed T1D. The primary endpoint was the maximum percentage increase in Tregs (defined as CD3(+)CD4(+)CD25(high)CD127(low)) from the baseline frequency in each participant measured over the 7 d following treatment. There was an initial learning phase with five pairs of participants, each pair receiving one of five pre-assigned single doses from 0.04 × 10(6) to 1.5 × 10(6) IU/m(2), in order to model the dose-response curve. Results from each participant were then incorporated into interim statistical modelling to target the two doses most likely to induce 10% and 20% increases in Treg frequencies. Primary analysis of the evaluable population (n = 39) found that the optimal doses of aldesleukin to induce 10% and 20% increases in Tregs were 0.101 × 10(6) IU/m(2) (standard error [SE] = 0.078, 95% CI = −0.052, 0.254) and 0.497 × 10(6) IU/m(2) (SE = 0.092, 95% CI = 0.316, 0.678), respectively. On analysis of secondary outcomes, using a highly sensitive IL-2 assay, the observed plasma concentrations of the drug at 90 min exceeded the hypothetical Treg-specific therapeutic window determined in vitro (0.015–0.24 IU/ml), even at the lowest doses (0.040 × 10(6) and 0.045 × 10(6) IU/m(2)) administered. A rapid decrease in Treg frequency in the circulation was observed at 90 min and at day 1, which was dose dependent (mean decrease 11.6%, SE = 2.3%, range 10.0%–48.2%, n = 37), rebounding at day 2 and increasing to frequencies above baseline over 7 d. Teffs, natural killer cells, and eosinophils also responded, with their frequencies rapidly and dose-dependently decreased in the blood, then returning to, or exceeding, pretreatment levels. Furthermore, there was a dose-dependent down modulation of one of the two signalling subunits of the IL-2 receptor, the β chain (CD122) (mean decrease = 58.0%, SE = 2.8%, range 9.8%–85.5%, n = 33), on Tregs and a reduction in their sensitivity to aldesleukin at 90 min and day 1 and 2 post-treatment. Due to blood volume requirements as well as ethical and practical considerations, the study was limited to adults and to analysis of peripheral blood only. CONCLUSIONS: The DILT1D trial results, most notably the early altered trafficking and desensitisation of Tregs induced by a single ultra-low dose of aldesleukin that resolves within 2–3 d, inform the design of the next trial to determine a repeat dosing regimen aimed at establishing a steady-state Treg frequency increase of 20%–50%, with the eventual goal of preventing T1D. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN27852285; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01827735 Public Library of Science 2016-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5058548/ /pubmed/27727279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002139 Text en © 2016 Todd et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Todd, John A.
Evangelou, Marina
Cutler, Antony J.
Pekalski, Marcin L.
Walker, Neil M.
Stevens, Helen E.
Porter, Linsey
Smyth, Deborah J.
Rainbow, Daniel B.
Ferreira, Ricardo C.
Esposito, Laura
Hunter, Kara M. D.
Loudon, Kevin
Irons, Kathryn
Yang, Jennie H.
Bell, Charles J. M.
Schuilenburg, Helen
Heywood, James
Challis, Ben
Neupane, Sankalpa
Clarke, Pamela
Coleman, Gillian
Dawson, Sarah
Goymer, Donna
Anselmiova, Katerina
Kennet, Jane
Brown, Judy
Caddy, Sarah L.
Lu, Jia
Greatorex, Jane
Goodfellow, Ian
Wallace, Chris
Tree, Tim I.
Evans, Mark
Mander, Adrian P.
Bond, Simon
Wicker, Linda S.
Waldron-Lynch, Frank
Regulatory T Cell Responses in Participants with Type 1 Diabetes after a Single Dose of Interleukin-2: A Non-Randomised, Open Label, Adaptive Dose-Finding Trial
title Regulatory T Cell Responses in Participants with Type 1 Diabetes after a Single Dose of Interleukin-2: A Non-Randomised, Open Label, Adaptive Dose-Finding Trial
title_full Regulatory T Cell Responses in Participants with Type 1 Diabetes after a Single Dose of Interleukin-2: A Non-Randomised, Open Label, Adaptive Dose-Finding Trial
title_fullStr Regulatory T Cell Responses in Participants with Type 1 Diabetes after a Single Dose of Interleukin-2: A Non-Randomised, Open Label, Adaptive Dose-Finding Trial
title_full_unstemmed Regulatory T Cell Responses in Participants with Type 1 Diabetes after a Single Dose of Interleukin-2: A Non-Randomised, Open Label, Adaptive Dose-Finding Trial
title_short Regulatory T Cell Responses in Participants with Type 1 Diabetes after a Single Dose of Interleukin-2: A Non-Randomised, Open Label, Adaptive Dose-Finding Trial
title_sort regulatory t cell responses in participants with type 1 diabetes after a single dose of interleukin-2: a non-randomised, open label, adaptive dose-finding trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5058548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27727279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002139
work_keys_str_mv AT toddjohna regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT evangeloumarina regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT cutlerantonyj regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT pekalskimarcinl regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT walkerneilm regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT stevenshelene regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT porterlinsey regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT smythdeborahj regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT rainbowdanielb regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT ferreiraricardoc regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT espositolaura regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT hunterkaramd regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT loudonkevin regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT ironskathryn regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT yangjennieh regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT bellcharlesjm regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT schuilenburghelen regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT heywoodjames regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT challisben regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT neupanesankalpa regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT clarkepamela regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT colemangillian regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT dawsonsarah regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT goymerdonna regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT anselmiovakaterina regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT kennetjane regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT brownjudy regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT caddysarahl regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT lujia regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT greatorexjane regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT goodfellowian regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT wallacechris regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT treetimi regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT evansmark regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT manderadrianp regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT bondsimon regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT wickerlindas regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial
AT waldronlynchfrank regulatorytcellresponsesinparticipantswithtype1diabetesafterasingledoseofinterleukin2anonrandomisedopenlabeladaptivedosefindingtrial