Cargando…

Systematic review with network meta-analysis: Comparative efficacy of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation

OBJECTIVES: Currently, no consensus exists regarding the optimal oral prophylactic regimens for hepatitis B surface antigen seropositive patients undergoing chemotherapy. We aimed to compare the efficacy of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs), including lamivudine, entecavir, adefovir, telbivudine an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Min-Yue, Zhu, Gui-Qi, Shi, Ke-Qing, Zheng, Ji-Na, Cheng, Zhang, Zou, Zhuo-Lin, Huang, Hong-Hui, Chen, Fang-Yuan, Zheng, Ming-Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5058707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27121321
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8907
_version_ 1782459287217373184
author Zhang, Min-Yue
Zhu, Gui-Qi
Shi, Ke-Qing
Zheng, Ji-Na
Cheng, Zhang
Zou, Zhuo-Lin
Huang, Hong-Hui
Chen, Fang-Yuan
Zheng, Ming-Hua
author_facet Zhang, Min-Yue
Zhu, Gui-Qi
Shi, Ke-Qing
Zheng, Ji-Na
Cheng, Zhang
Zou, Zhuo-Lin
Huang, Hong-Hui
Chen, Fang-Yuan
Zheng, Ming-Hua
author_sort Zhang, Min-Yue
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Currently, no consensus exists regarding the optimal oral prophylactic regimens for hepatitis B surface antigen seropositive patients undergoing chemotherapy. We aimed to compare the efficacy of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs), including lamivudine, entecavir, adefovir, telbivudine and tenofovir, for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation and its related morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic HBV (CHB) infection. RESULTS: Fifty-two eligible articles consisting of 3892 participants were included. For HBV reactivation, prophylactic treatment with NAs were all significantly superior to no prophylaxis, with odds ratio (OR) from 0.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.00~0.04) for the most effective intervention (tenofovir) to 0.10 (95% CI 0.06~0.14) for the least effective intervention (lamivudine). For secondary outcomes, prophylaxis with NAs also significantly outperformed observation. The results suggested that entecavir reduced the risk of HBV related hepatitis (predicted probability, 83%), HBV related death (68%) and all causes of hepatitis (97%) most efficaciously. It ranked second in decreasing all causes of death (34%). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library database were searched for controlled trials up to March 31, 2015. Primary outcome was the incidence of HBV reactivation. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of HBV-related hepatitis and death, all causes of hepatitis and death. Network meta-analysis combined direct and indirect evidence to estimate ORs for the clinical outcomes. A mean ranking and the probability of optimal therapeutic regime was obtained for each treatment based on clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence suggests that prophylatic therapy with tenofovir and entecavir may be the most potent interventions in prevention of HBV reactivation and HBV-related morbidity and mortality for CHB infection patients undergoing chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5058707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50587072016-10-15 Systematic review with network meta-analysis: Comparative efficacy of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation Zhang, Min-Yue Zhu, Gui-Qi Shi, Ke-Qing Zheng, Ji-Na Cheng, Zhang Zou, Zhuo-Lin Huang, Hong-Hui Chen, Fang-Yuan Zheng, Ming-Hua Oncotarget Research Paper OBJECTIVES: Currently, no consensus exists regarding the optimal oral prophylactic regimens for hepatitis B surface antigen seropositive patients undergoing chemotherapy. We aimed to compare the efficacy of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs), including lamivudine, entecavir, adefovir, telbivudine and tenofovir, for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation and its related morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic HBV (CHB) infection. RESULTS: Fifty-two eligible articles consisting of 3892 participants were included. For HBV reactivation, prophylactic treatment with NAs were all significantly superior to no prophylaxis, with odds ratio (OR) from 0.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.00~0.04) for the most effective intervention (tenofovir) to 0.10 (95% CI 0.06~0.14) for the least effective intervention (lamivudine). For secondary outcomes, prophylaxis with NAs also significantly outperformed observation. The results suggested that entecavir reduced the risk of HBV related hepatitis (predicted probability, 83%), HBV related death (68%) and all causes of hepatitis (97%) most efficaciously. It ranked second in decreasing all causes of death (34%). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library database were searched for controlled trials up to March 31, 2015. Primary outcome was the incidence of HBV reactivation. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of HBV-related hepatitis and death, all causes of hepatitis and death. Network meta-analysis combined direct and indirect evidence to estimate ORs for the clinical outcomes. A mean ranking and the probability of optimal therapeutic regime was obtained for each treatment based on clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence suggests that prophylatic therapy with tenofovir and entecavir may be the most potent interventions in prevention of HBV reactivation and HBV-related morbidity and mortality for CHB infection patients undergoing chemotherapy. Impact Journals LLC 2016-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5058707/ /pubmed/27121321 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8907 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Zhang, Min-Yue
Zhu, Gui-Qi
Shi, Ke-Qing
Zheng, Ji-Na
Cheng, Zhang
Zou, Zhuo-Lin
Huang, Hong-Hui
Chen, Fang-Yuan
Zheng, Ming-Hua
Systematic review with network meta-analysis: Comparative efficacy of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation
title Systematic review with network meta-analysis: Comparative efficacy of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation
title_full Systematic review with network meta-analysis: Comparative efficacy of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation
title_fullStr Systematic review with network meta-analysis: Comparative efficacy of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review with network meta-analysis: Comparative efficacy of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation
title_short Systematic review with network meta-analysis: Comparative efficacy of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation
title_sort systematic review with network meta-analysis: comparative efficacy of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced hepatitis b virus reactivation
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5058707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27121321
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8907
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangminyue systematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyoforalnucleostideanaloguesforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedhepatitisbvirusreactivation
AT zhuguiqi systematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyoforalnucleostideanaloguesforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedhepatitisbvirusreactivation
AT shikeqing systematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyoforalnucleostideanaloguesforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedhepatitisbvirusreactivation
AT zhengjina systematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyoforalnucleostideanaloguesforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedhepatitisbvirusreactivation
AT chengzhang systematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyoforalnucleostideanaloguesforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedhepatitisbvirusreactivation
AT zouzhuolin systematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyoforalnucleostideanaloguesforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedhepatitisbvirusreactivation
AT huanghonghui systematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyoforalnucleostideanaloguesforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedhepatitisbvirusreactivation
AT chenfangyuan systematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyoforalnucleostideanaloguesforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedhepatitisbvirusreactivation
AT zhengminghua systematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyoforalnucleostideanaloguesforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedhepatitisbvirusreactivation