Cargando…
Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT
Usually, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is performed during breath-holding to reduce artifact caused by respiration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of free-breathing CCTA compared to breath-holding using CT scanner with wide detector. To evaluate the fea...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5058833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27399104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004096 |
_version_ | 1782459315283558400 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Zhuo Sun, Ye Zhang, Zhuolu Chen, Lei Hong, Nan |
author_facet | Liu, Zhuo Sun, Ye Zhang, Zhuolu Chen, Lei Hong, Nan |
author_sort | Liu, Zhuo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Usually, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is performed during breath-holding to reduce artifact caused by respiration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of free-breathing CCTA compared to breath-holding using CT scanner with wide detector. To evaluate the feasibility of CCTA during free-breathing using a 256-MDCT. In 80 patients who underwent CCTA, 40 were performed during breath-holding (group A), and the remaining 40 during free-breathing (group B). The quality scores for coronary arteries were analyzed and defined as: 3 (excellent), 2 (good), and 1 (poor). The image noise, signal-to-noise ratio and effective radiation dose as well as the heart rate variation were compared. The noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and effective radiation dose were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The mean heart rate variation between planning and scanning for group A was 7 ± 7.6 bpm, and larger than 3 ± 2.6 bpm for group B (P = 0.012). Quality scores of the free-breathing group were better than those of the breath-holding group (group A: 2.55 ± 0.64, group B: 2.85 ± 0.36, P = 0.018). Free-breathing CCTA is feasible on wide detector CT scanner to provide acceptable image quality with reduced heart rate variation and better images for certain patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5058833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50588332016-11-18 Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT Liu, Zhuo Sun, Ye Zhang, Zhuolu Chen, Lei Hong, Nan Medicine (Baltimore) 6800 Usually, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is performed during breath-holding to reduce artifact caused by respiration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of free-breathing CCTA compared to breath-holding using CT scanner with wide detector. To evaluate the feasibility of CCTA during free-breathing using a 256-MDCT. In 80 patients who underwent CCTA, 40 were performed during breath-holding (group A), and the remaining 40 during free-breathing (group B). The quality scores for coronary arteries were analyzed and defined as: 3 (excellent), 2 (good), and 1 (poor). The image noise, signal-to-noise ratio and effective radiation dose as well as the heart rate variation were compared. The noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and effective radiation dose were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The mean heart rate variation between planning and scanning for group A was 7 ± 7.6 bpm, and larger than 3 ± 2.6 bpm for group B (P = 0.012). Quality scores of the free-breathing group were better than those of the breath-holding group (group A: 2.55 ± 0.64, group B: 2.85 ± 0.36, P = 0.018). Free-breathing CCTA is feasible on wide detector CT scanner to provide acceptable image quality with reduced heart rate variation and better images for certain patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5058833/ /pubmed/27399104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004096 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 6800 Liu, Zhuo Sun, Ye Zhang, Zhuolu Chen, Lei Hong, Nan Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT |
title | Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT |
title_full | Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT |
title_short | Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT |
title_sort | feasibility of free-breathing ccta using 256-mdct |
topic | 6800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5058833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27399104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004096 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuzhuo feasibilityoffreebreathingcctausing256mdct AT sunye feasibilityoffreebreathingcctausing256mdct AT zhangzhuolu feasibilityoffreebreathingcctausing256mdct AT chenlei feasibilityoffreebreathingcctausing256mdct AT hongnan feasibilityoffreebreathingcctausing256mdct |