Cargando…

Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT

Usually, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is performed during breath-holding to reduce artifact caused by respiration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of free-breathing CCTA compared to breath-holding using CT scanner with wide detector. To evaluate the fea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Zhuo, Sun, Ye, Zhang, Zhuolu, Chen, Lei, Hong, Nan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5058833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27399104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004096
_version_ 1782459315283558400
author Liu, Zhuo
Sun, Ye
Zhang, Zhuolu
Chen, Lei
Hong, Nan
author_facet Liu, Zhuo
Sun, Ye
Zhang, Zhuolu
Chen, Lei
Hong, Nan
author_sort Liu, Zhuo
collection PubMed
description Usually, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is performed during breath-holding to reduce artifact caused by respiration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of free-breathing CCTA compared to breath-holding using CT scanner with wide detector. To evaluate the feasibility of CCTA during free-breathing using a 256-MDCT. In 80 patients who underwent CCTA, 40 were performed during breath-holding (group A), and the remaining 40 during free-breathing (group B). The quality scores for coronary arteries were analyzed and defined as: 3 (excellent), 2 (good), and 1 (poor). The image noise, signal-to-noise ratio and effective radiation dose as well as the heart rate variation were compared. The noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and effective radiation dose were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The mean heart rate variation between planning and scanning for group A was 7 ± 7.6 bpm, and larger than 3 ± 2.6 bpm for group B (P = 0.012). Quality scores of the free-breathing group were better than those of the breath-holding group (group A: 2.55 ± 0.64, group B: 2.85 ± 0.36, P = 0.018). Free-breathing CCTA is feasible on wide detector CT scanner to provide acceptable image quality with reduced heart rate variation and better images for certain patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5058833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50588332016-11-18 Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT Liu, Zhuo Sun, Ye Zhang, Zhuolu Chen, Lei Hong, Nan Medicine (Baltimore) 6800 Usually, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is performed during breath-holding to reduce artifact caused by respiration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of free-breathing CCTA compared to breath-holding using CT scanner with wide detector. To evaluate the feasibility of CCTA during free-breathing using a 256-MDCT. In 80 patients who underwent CCTA, 40 were performed during breath-holding (group A), and the remaining 40 during free-breathing (group B). The quality scores for coronary arteries were analyzed and defined as: 3 (excellent), 2 (good), and 1 (poor). The image noise, signal-to-noise ratio and effective radiation dose as well as the heart rate variation were compared. The noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and effective radiation dose were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The mean heart rate variation between planning and scanning for group A was 7 ± 7.6 bpm, and larger than 3 ± 2.6 bpm for group B (P = 0.012). Quality scores of the free-breathing group were better than those of the breath-holding group (group A: 2.55 ± 0.64, group B: 2.85 ± 0.36, P = 0.018). Free-breathing CCTA is feasible on wide detector CT scanner to provide acceptable image quality with reduced heart rate variation and better images for certain patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5058833/ /pubmed/27399104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004096 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 6800
Liu, Zhuo
Sun, Ye
Zhang, Zhuolu
Chen, Lei
Hong, Nan
Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT
title Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT
title_full Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT
title_fullStr Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT
title_short Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT
title_sort feasibility of free-breathing ccta using 256-mdct
topic 6800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5058833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27399104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004096
work_keys_str_mv AT liuzhuo feasibilityoffreebreathingcctausing256mdct
AT sunye feasibilityoffreebreathingcctausing256mdct
AT zhangzhuolu feasibilityoffreebreathingcctausing256mdct
AT chenlei feasibilityoffreebreathingcctausing256mdct
AT hongnan feasibilityoffreebreathingcctausing256mdct