Cargando…
Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
ABSTRACT: Prevalence estimates of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) following cervical spine surgery varied greatly in current studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the point prevalence of ASD after cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Comprehensive electronic search...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5058869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27399140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004171 |
_version_ | 1782459323956330496 |
---|---|
author | Kong, Lingde Cao, Junming Wang, Linfeng Shen, Yong |
author_facet | Kong, Lingde Cao, Junming Wang, Linfeng Shen, Yong |
author_sort | Kong, Lingde |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Prevalence estimates of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) following cervical spine surgery varied greatly in current studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the point prevalence of ASD after cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Comprehensive electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted to identify any study published from initial state to January 2016. Those reporting the prevalence of ASD after cervical surgery were included. A random-effects model was used to estimate the prevalence of radiographic ASD, symptomatic ASD, and reoperation ASD. Univariate meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore the potential associations between prevalence and length of follow-up. All analyses were performed using R version 3.2.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). RESULTS: A total of 83 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of radiographic ASD, symptomatic ASD, and reoperation ASD after cervical surgery was 28.28% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.96–36.96), 13.34% (95% CI, 11.06–16.00), and 5.78% (95% CI, 4.99–6.69), respectively, in a general analysis. It was found 2.79%, 1.43%, and 0.24% additions per year of follow-up in the incidence of radiographic ASD, symptomatic ASD, and reoperation ASD, respectively. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides some details about the prevalence of radiographic ASD, symptomatic ASD, and reoperation ASD after cervical spine surgery. However, the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution because of the heterogeneity among the studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5058869 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50588692016-11-18 Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis Kong, Lingde Cao, Junming Wang, Linfeng Shen, Yong Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 ABSTRACT: Prevalence estimates of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) following cervical spine surgery varied greatly in current studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the point prevalence of ASD after cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Comprehensive electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted to identify any study published from initial state to January 2016. Those reporting the prevalence of ASD after cervical surgery were included. A random-effects model was used to estimate the prevalence of radiographic ASD, symptomatic ASD, and reoperation ASD. Univariate meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore the potential associations between prevalence and length of follow-up. All analyses were performed using R version 3.2.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). RESULTS: A total of 83 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of radiographic ASD, symptomatic ASD, and reoperation ASD after cervical surgery was 28.28% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.96–36.96), 13.34% (95% CI, 11.06–16.00), and 5.78% (95% CI, 4.99–6.69), respectively, in a general analysis. It was found 2.79%, 1.43%, and 0.24% additions per year of follow-up in the incidence of radiographic ASD, symptomatic ASD, and reoperation ASD, respectively. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides some details about the prevalence of radiographic ASD, symptomatic ASD, and reoperation ASD after cervical spine surgery. However, the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution because of the heterogeneity among the studies. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5058869/ /pubmed/27399140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004171 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 7100 Kong, Lingde Cao, Junming Wang, Linfeng Shen, Yong Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: a prisma-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5058869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27399140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004171 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT konglingde prevalenceofadjacentsegmentdiseasefollowingcervicalspinesurgeryaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT caojunming prevalenceofadjacentsegmentdiseasefollowingcervicalspinesurgeryaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wanglinfeng prevalenceofadjacentsegmentdiseasefollowingcervicalspinesurgeryaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shenyong prevalenceofadjacentsegmentdiseasefollowingcervicalspinesurgeryaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |