Cargando…

Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

ABSTRACT: Prevalence estimates of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) following cervical spine surgery varied greatly in current studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the point prevalence of ASD after cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Comprehensive electronic search...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kong, Lingde, Cao, Junming, Wang, Linfeng, Shen, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5058869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27399140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004171
_version_ 1782459323956330496
author Kong, Lingde
Cao, Junming
Wang, Linfeng
Shen, Yong
author_facet Kong, Lingde
Cao, Junming
Wang, Linfeng
Shen, Yong
author_sort Kong, Lingde
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: Prevalence estimates of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) following cervical spine surgery varied greatly in current studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the point prevalence of ASD after cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Comprehensive electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted to identify any study published from initial state to January 2016. Those reporting the prevalence of ASD after cervical surgery were included. A random-effects model was used to estimate the prevalence of radiographic ASD, symptomatic ASD, and reoperation ASD. Univariate meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore the potential associations between prevalence and length of follow-up. All analyses were performed using R version 3.2.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). RESULTS: A total of 83 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of radiographic ASD, symptomatic ASD, and reoperation ASD after cervical surgery was 28.28% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.96–36.96), 13.34% (95% CI, 11.06–16.00), and 5.78% (95% CI, 4.99–6.69), respectively, in a general analysis. It was found 2.79%, 1.43%, and 0.24% additions per year of follow-up in the incidence of radiographic ASD, symptomatic ASD, and reoperation ASD, respectively. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides some details about the prevalence of radiographic ASD, symptomatic ASD, and reoperation ASD after cervical spine surgery. However, the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution because of the heterogeneity among the studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5058869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50588692016-11-18 Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis Kong, Lingde Cao, Junming Wang, Linfeng Shen, Yong Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 ABSTRACT: Prevalence estimates of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) following cervical spine surgery varied greatly in current studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the point prevalence of ASD after cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Comprehensive electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted to identify any study published from initial state to January 2016. Those reporting the prevalence of ASD after cervical surgery were included. A random-effects model was used to estimate the prevalence of radiographic ASD, symptomatic ASD, and reoperation ASD. Univariate meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore the potential associations between prevalence and length of follow-up. All analyses were performed using R version 3.2.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). RESULTS: A total of 83 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of radiographic ASD, symptomatic ASD, and reoperation ASD after cervical surgery was 28.28% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.96–36.96), 13.34% (95% CI, 11.06–16.00), and 5.78% (95% CI, 4.99–6.69), respectively, in a general analysis. It was found 2.79%, 1.43%, and 0.24% additions per year of follow-up in the incidence of radiographic ASD, symptomatic ASD, and reoperation ASD, respectively. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides some details about the prevalence of radiographic ASD, symptomatic ASD, and reoperation ASD after cervical spine surgery. However, the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution because of the heterogeneity among the studies. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5058869/ /pubmed/27399140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004171 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Kong, Lingde
Cao, Junming
Wang, Linfeng
Shen, Yong
Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: a prisma-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5058869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27399140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004171
work_keys_str_mv AT konglingde prevalenceofadjacentsegmentdiseasefollowingcervicalspinesurgeryaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caojunming prevalenceofadjacentsegmentdiseasefollowingcervicalspinesurgeryaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanglinfeng prevalenceofadjacentsegmentdiseasefollowingcervicalspinesurgeryaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenyong prevalenceofadjacentsegmentdiseasefollowingcervicalspinesurgeryaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis