Cargando…
Differences in the Pathological Diagnosis and Repeat Craniotomy Rates in Cerebral Tumors Undergoing Biopsy or Resection in an Urban Versus Regional Center
Primary intracranial tumors occur with an incidence of between 2.5 and 6 per 100,000 individuals. They require specialist expertise for investigation and management including input from radiology, pathology, neurosurgery, and oncology. Therefore, most patients with intracranial neoplasia are investi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5059004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26632735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002131 |
_version_ | 1782459355829895168 |
---|---|
author | Vonhoff, Craig R. Lochhead, Alistair Koustais, Stavros Watson, Nicole Andrici, Juliana Brewer, Janice Gill, Anthony J. |
author_facet | Vonhoff, Craig R. Lochhead, Alistair Koustais, Stavros Watson, Nicole Andrici, Juliana Brewer, Janice Gill, Anthony J. |
author_sort | Vonhoff, Craig R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Primary intracranial tumors occur with an incidence of between 2.5 and 6 per 100,000 individuals. They require specialist expertise for investigation and management including input from radiology, pathology, neurosurgery, and oncology. Therefore, most patients with intracranial neoplasia are investigated and managed in larger hospitals. The geographically dispersed population of Australia has facilitated the development of neurosurgical units in regional areas. However, major metropolitan hospitals are over-represented compared with regional centers in most research cohorts. We therefore sought to investigate the spectrum of intracranial neoplasms undergoing biopsy and surgery at a major regional center in Australia and to compare the demographic and pathological features to similar cohorts treated in major metropolitan hospitals. We searched the pathological databases of both a major regional pathology provider and a major metropolitan pathology practice, which provides surgical pathology services for both a large private and a large public neurosurgical hospital, to identify all cerebral tumors undergoing biopsy or resection over a 14-year period (calendar years 2001 and 2014). In all, 3717 cerebral tumors were identified. Among them, 51% were from an urban private hospital, 33% from an urban public hospital, and 16% from a regional public hospital. Overall, one-third of them were neuroepithelial in origin, a quarter metastatic disease, a fifth meningeal, and one-tenth were pituitary adenomas. The regional center treated a higher proportion of metastatic tumors and less meningeal tumors compared with the urban center. Additionally, patients were less likely to undergo a second operation in the regional center (P < 0.001). The differences give an important insight into the burden of neurosurgical disease in regional Australia, and how it differs from that encountered in large metropolitan centers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5059004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50590042016-11-01 Differences in the Pathological Diagnosis and Repeat Craniotomy Rates in Cerebral Tumors Undergoing Biopsy or Resection in an Urban Versus Regional Center Vonhoff, Craig R. Lochhead, Alistair Koustais, Stavros Watson, Nicole Andrici, Juliana Brewer, Janice Gill, Anthony J. Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 Primary intracranial tumors occur with an incidence of between 2.5 and 6 per 100,000 individuals. They require specialist expertise for investigation and management including input from radiology, pathology, neurosurgery, and oncology. Therefore, most patients with intracranial neoplasia are investigated and managed in larger hospitals. The geographically dispersed population of Australia has facilitated the development of neurosurgical units in regional areas. However, major metropolitan hospitals are over-represented compared with regional centers in most research cohorts. We therefore sought to investigate the spectrum of intracranial neoplasms undergoing biopsy and surgery at a major regional center in Australia and to compare the demographic and pathological features to similar cohorts treated in major metropolitan hospitals. We searched the pathological databases of both a major regional pathology provider and a major metropolitan pathology practice, which provides surgical pathology services for both a large private and a large public neurosurgical hospital, to identify all cerebral tumors undergoing biopsy or resection over a 14-year period (calendar years 2001 and 2014). In all, 3717 cerebral tumors were identified. Among them, 51% were from an urban private hospital, 33% from an urban public hospital, and 16% from a regional public hospital. Overall, one-third of them were neuroepithelial in origin, a quarter metastatic disease, a fifth meningeal, and one-tenth were pituitary adenomas. The regional center treated a higher proportion of metastatic tumors and less meningeal tumors compared with the urban center. Additionally, patients were less likely to undergo a second operation in the regional center (P < 0.001). The differences give an important insight into the burden of neurosurgical disease in regional Australia, and how it differs from that encountered in large metropolitan centers. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5059004/ /pubmed/26632735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002131 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5700 Vonhoff, Craig R. Lochhead, Alistair Koustais, Stavros Watson, Nicole Andrici, Juliana Brewer, Janice Gill, Anthony J. Differences in the Pathological Diagnosis and Repeat Craniotomy Rates in Cerebral Tumors Undergoing Biopsy or Resection in an Urban Versus Regional Center |
title | Differences in the Pathological Diagnosis and Repeat Craniotomy Rates in Cerebral Tumors Undergoing Biopsy or Resection in an Urban Versus Regional Center |
title_full | Differences in the Pathological Diagnosis and Repeat Craniotomy Rates in Cerebral Tumors Undergoing Biopsy or Resection in an Urban Versus Regional Center |
title_fullStr | Differences in the Pathological Diagnosis and Repeat Craniotomy Rates in Cerebral Tumors Undergoing Biopsy or Resection in an Urban Versus Regional Center |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in the Pathological Diagnosis and Repeat Craniotomy Rates in Cerebral Tumors Undergoing Biopsy or Resection in an Urban Versus Regional Center |
title_short | Differences in the Pathological Diagnosis and Repeat Craniotomy Rates in Cerebral Tumors Undergoing Biopsy or Resection in an Urban Versus Regional Center |
title_sort | differences in the pathological diagnosis and repeat craniotomy rates in cerebral tumors undergoing biopsy or resection in an urban versus regional center |
topic | 5700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5059004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26632735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002131 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vonhoffcraigr differencesinthepathologicaldiagnosisandrepeatcraniotomyratesincerebraltumorsundergoingbiopsyorresectioninanurbanversusregionalcenter AT lochheadalistair differencesinthepathologicaldiagnosisandrepeatcraniotomyratesincerebraltumorsundergoingbiopsyorresectioninanurbanversusregionalcenter AT koustaisstavros differencesinthepathologicaldiagnosisandrepeatcraniotomyratesincerebraltumorsundergoingbiopsyorresectioninanurbanversusregionalcenter AT watsonnicole differencesinthepathologicaldiagnosisandrepeatcraniotomyratesincerebraltumorsundergoingbiopsyorresectioninanurbanversusregionalcenter AT andricijuliana differencesinthepathologicaldiagnosisandrepeatcraniotomyratesincerebraltumorsundergoingbiopsyorresectioninanurbanversusregionalcenter AT brewerjanice differencesinthepathologicaldiagnosisandrepeatcraniotomyratesincerebraltumorsundergoingbiopsyorresectioninanurbanversusregionalcenter AT gillanthonyj differencesinthepathologicaldiagnosisandrepeatcraniotomyratesincerebraltumorsundergoingbiopsyorresectioninanurbanversusregionalcenter |