Cargando…
Diagnostic Value of Presepsin for Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Several individual studies have reported the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin (sCD14-ST) for sepsis, but the results are inconsistent. The present systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data to better ascertain the value of circulatory presepsin as a biomarker for sepsis. Studies published in En...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5059017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26632748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002158 |
_version_ | 1782459358856085504 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Jing Hu, Zhi-De Song, Jia Shao, Jiang |
author_facet | Zhang, Jing Hu, Zhi-De Song, Jia Shao, Jiang |
author_sort | Zhang, Jing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several individual studies have reported the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin (sCD14-ST) for sepsis, but the results are inconsistent. The present systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data to better ascertain the value of circulatory presepsin as a biomarker for sepsis. Studies published in English before November 7, 2014 and assessing the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for sepsis were retrieved from medical databases. The quality of eligible studies was assessed using a revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2). The overall diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for sepsis was pooled according to a bivariate model. Publication bias was assessed using Deek funnel plot asymmetry test. Eleven studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The overall diagnostic sensitivity of presepsin for sepsis was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77–0.88), and specificity was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72–0.83). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84–0.90). The pretest probability of sepsis was 0.56 among all subjects. When presepsin was introduced as the diagnostic test for sepsis, the posttest probabilities were 0.81 for a positive result and 0.19 for a negative. The major design deficits of the included studies were lack of prespecified thresholds and patient selection bias. The publication bias was negative. Presepsin is an effective adjunct biomarker for the diagnosis of sepsis, but is insufficient to detect or rule out sepsis when used alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5059017 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50590172016-11-01 Diagnostic Value of Presepsin for Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhang, Jing Hu, Zhi-De Song, Jia Shao, Jiang Medicine (Baltimore) 3900 Several individual studies have reported the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin (sCD14-ST) for sepsis, but the results are inconsistent. The present systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data to better ascertain the value of circulatory presepsin as a biomarker for sepsis. Studies published in English before November 7, 2014 and assessing the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for sepsis were retrieved from medical databases. The quality of eligible studies was assessed using a revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2). The overall diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for sepsis was pooled according to a bivariate model. Publication bias was assessed using Deek funnel plot asymmetry test. Eleven studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The overall diagnostic sensitivity of presepsin for sepsis was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77–0.88), and specificity was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72–0.83). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84–0.90). The pretest probability of sepsis was 0.56 among all subjects. When presepsin was introduced as the diagnostic test for sepsis, the posttest probabilities were 0.81 for a positive result and 0.19 for a negative. The major design deficits of the included studies were lack of prespecified thresholds and patient selection bias. The publication bias was negative. Presepsin is an effective adjunct biomarker for the diagnosis of sepsis, but is insufficient to detect or rule out sepsis when used alone. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5059017/ /pubmed/26632748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002158 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0, where it is permissible to download, share and reproduce the work in any medium, provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 3900 Zhang, Jing Hu, Zhi-De Song, Jia Shao, Jiang Diagnostic Value of Presepsin for Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Diagnostic Value of Presepsin for Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic Value of Presepsin for Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Value of Presepsin for Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Value of Presepsin for Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic Value of Presepsin for Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic value of presepsin for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | 3900 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5059017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26632748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangjing diagnosticvalueofpresepsinforsepsisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huzhide diagnosticvalueofpresepsinforsepsisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT songjia diagnosticvalueofpresepsinforsepsisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shaojiang diagnosticvalueofpresepsinforsepsisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |