Cargando…

Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Can Be Used as an Adjuvant Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis

As part of “liquid biopsy,” lots of literature indicated the potential diagnostic value of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the literature on the accuracy of cfDNA detection in PCa has been inconsistent. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yin, Changqing, Luo, Changliang, Hu, Wei, Ding, Xu, Yuan, Chunhui, Wang, Fubing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5059577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27766004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3825819
_version_ 1782459433038643200
author Yin, Changqing
Luo, Changliang
Hu, Wei
Ding, Xu
Yuan, Chunhui
Wang, Fubing
author_facet Yin, Changqing
Luo, Changliang
Hu, Wei
Ding, Xu
Yuan, Chunhui
Wang, Fubing
author_sort Yin, Changqing
collection PubMed
description As part of “liquid biopsy,” lots of literature indicated the potential diagnostic value of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the literature on the accuracy of cfDNA detection in PCa has been inconsistent. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic value of cfDNA in PCa. A total of 19 articles were included in this analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We then investigated two main subgroups in this meta-analysis, including qualitative analysis of abnormal level of cfDNA and qualitative analysis of single-gene methylation alterations. Overall, the results of quantitative analysis showed sensitivity of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.62–0.82) and specificity of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.70–0.87), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80–0.86). For qualitative assessment, the values were 0.34 (95% CI, 0.22–0.48), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97–1.00), and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93), respectively. Our results suggest the pooled specificity of each subgroup is much higher than the specificity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). However, they are not recommended for PCa screening alone, because their sensitivities are not higher than the conventional serum biomarkers PSA. We conclude that analysis of cfDNA can be used as an adjuvant tool for PCa screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5059577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50595772016-10-20 Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Can Be Used as an Adjuvant Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis Yin, Changqing Luo, Changliang Hu, Wei Ding, Xu Yuan, Chunhui Wang, Fubing Dis Markers Review Article As part of “liquid biopsy,” lots of literature indicated the potential diagnostic value of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the literature on the accuracy of cfDNA detection in PCa has been inconsistent. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic value of cfDNA in PCa. A total of 19 articles were included in this analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We then investigated two main subgroups in this meta-analysis, including qualitative analysis of abnormal level of cfDNA and qualitative analysis of single-gene methylation alterations. Overall, the results of quantitative analysis showed sensitivity of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.62–0.82) and specificity of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.70–0.87), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80–0.86). For qualitative assessment, the values were 0.34 (95% CI, 0.22–0.48), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97–1.00), and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93), respectively. Our results suggest the pooled specificity of each subgroup is much higher than the specificity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). However, they are not recommended for PCa screening alone, because their sensitivities are not higher than the conventional serum biomarkers PSA. We conclude that analysis of cfDNA can be used as an adjuvant tool for PCa screening. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5059577/ /pubmed/27766004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3825819 Text en Copyright © 2016 Changqing Yin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Yin, Changqing
Luo, Changliang
Hu, Wei
Ding, Xu
Yuan, Chunhui
Wang, Fubing
Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Can Be Used as an Adjuvant Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis
title Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Can Be Used as an Adjuvant Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Can Be Used as an Adjuvant Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Can Be Used as an Adjuvant Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Can Be Used as an Adjuvant Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Can Be Used as an Adjuvant Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort quantitative and qualitative analysis of circulating cell-free dna can be used as an adjuvant tool for prostate cancer screening: a meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5059577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27766004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3825819
work_keys_str_mv AT yinchangqing quantitativeandqualitativeanalysisofcirculatingcellfreednacanbeusedasanadjuvanttoolforprostatecancerscreeningametaanalysis
AT luochangliang quantitativeandqualitativeanalysisofcirculatingcellfreednacanbeusedasanadjuvanttoolforprostatecancerscreeningametaanalysis
AT huwei quantitativeandqualitativeanalysisofcirculatingcellfreednacanbeusedasanadjuvanttoolforprostatecancerscreeningametaanalysis
AT dingxu quantitativeandqualitativeanalysisofcirculatingcellfreednacanbeusedasanadjuvanttoolforprostatecancerscreeningametaanalysis
AT yuanchunhui quantitativeandqualitativeanalysisofcirculatingcellfreednacanbeusedasanadjuvanttoolforprostatecancerscreeningametaanalysis
AT wangfubing quantitativeandqualitativeanalysisofcirculatingcellfreednacanbeusedasanadjuvanttoolforprostatecancerscreeningametaanalysis