Cargando…
Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Can Be Used as an Adjuvant Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis
As part of “liquid biopsy,” lots of literature indicated the potential diagnostic value of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the literature on the accuracy of cfDNA detection in PCa has been inconsistent. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5059577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27766004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3825819 |
_version_ | 1782459433038643200 |
---|---|
author | Yin, Changqing Luo, Changliang Hu, Wei Ding, Xu Yuan, Chunhui Wang, Fubing |
author_facet | Yin, Changqing Luo, Changliang Hu, Wei Ding, Xu Yuan, Chunhui Wang, Fubing |
author_sort | Yin, Changqing |
collection | PubMed |
description | As part of “liquid biopsy,” lots of literature indicated the potential diagnostic value of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the literature on the accuracy of cfDNA detection in PCa has been inconsistent. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic value of cfDNA in PCa. A total of 19 articles were included in this analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We then investigated two main subgroups in this meta-analysis, including qualitative analysis of abnormal level of cfDNA and qualitative analysis of single-gene methylation alterations. Overall, the results of quantitative analysis showed sensitivity of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.62–0.82) and specificity of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.70–0.87), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80–0.86). For qualitative assessment, the values were 0.34 (95% CI, 0.22–0.48), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97–1.00), and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93), respectively. Our results suggest the pooled specificity of each subgroup is much higher than the specificity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). However, they are not recommended for PCa screening alone, because their sensitivities are not higher than the conventional serum biomarkers PSA. We conclude that analysis of cfDNA can be used as an adjuvant tool for PCa screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5059577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50595772016-10-20 Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Can Be Used as an Adjuvant Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis Yin, Changqing Luo, Changliang Hu, Wei Ding, Xu Yuan, Chunhui Wang, Fubing Dis Markers Review Article As part of “liquid biopsy,” lots of literature indicated the potential diagnostic value of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the literature on the accuracy of cfDNA detection in PCa has been inconsistent. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic value of cfDNA in PCa. A total of 19 articles were included in this analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We then investigated two main subgroups in this meta-analysis, including qualitative analysis of abnormal level of cfDNA and qualitative analysis of single-gene methylation alterations. Overall, the results of quantitative analysis showed sensitivity of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.62–0.82) and specificity of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.70–0.87), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80–0.86). For qualitative assessment, the values were 0.34 (95% CI, 0.22–0.48), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97–1.00), and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93), respectively. Our results suggest the pooled specificity of each subgroup is much higher than the specificity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). However, they are not recommended for PCa screening alone, because their sensitivities are not higher than the conventional serum biomarkers PSA. We conclude that analysis of cfDNA can be used as an adjuvant tool for PCa screening. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5059577/ /pubmed/27766004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3825819 Text en Copyright © 2016 Changqing Yin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Yin, Changqing Luo, Changliang Hu, Wei Ding, Xu Yuan, Chunhui Wang, Fubing Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Can Be Used as an Adjuvant Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Can Be Used as an Adjuvant Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Can Be Used as an Adjuvant Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Can Be Used as an Adjuvant Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Can Be Used as an Adjuvant Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Can Be Used as an Adjuvant Tool for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | quantitative and qualitative analysis of circulating cell-free dna can be used as an adjuvant tool for prostate cancer screening: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5059577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27766004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3825819 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yinchangqing quantitativeandqualitativeanalysisofcirculatingcellfreednacanbeusedasanadjuvanttoolforprostatecancerscreeningametaanalysis AT luochangliang quantitativeandqualitativeanalysisofcirculatingcellfreednacanbeusedasanadjuvanttoolforprostatecancerscreeningametaanalysis AT huwei quantitativeandqualitativeanalysisofcirculatingcellfreednacanbeusedasanadjuvanttoolforprostatecancerscreeningametaanalysis AT dingxu quantitativeandqualitativeanalysisofcirculatingcellfreednacanbeusedasanadjuvanttoolforprostatecancerscreeningametaanalysis AT yuanchunhui quantitativeandqualitativeanalysisofcirculatingcellfreednacanbeusedasanadjuvanttoolforprostatecancerscreeningametaanalysis AT wangfubing quantitativeandqualitativeanalysisofcirculatingcellfreednacanbeusedasanadjuvanttoolforprostatecancerscreeningametaanalysis |