Cargando…

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer Demarcation

This study aimed to evaluate the utility of optical enhancement (OE) in early gastric cancer demarcation. Twenty lesions of early gastric cancer were examined by PENTAX endoscopy system with OE-1 and OE-2 functions. The areas of tumor demarcation identified by 12 evaluators (6 novice and 6 experienc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagao, Misato, Nishikawa, Jun, Ogawa, Ryo, Sasaki, Sho, Nakamura, Munetaka, Nishimura, Junichi, Goto, Atsushi, Hashimoto, Shinichi, Okamoto, Takeshi, Suenaga, Masato, Hamamoto, Yoshihiko, Sakaida, Isao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5059582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2439621
_version_ 1782459434186833920
author Nagao, Misato
Nishikawa, Jun
Ogawa, Ryo
Sasaki, Sho
Nakamura, Munetaka
Nishimura, Junichi
Goto, Atsushi
Hashimoto, Shinichi
Okamoto, Takeshi
Suenaga, Masato
Hamamoto, Yoshihiko
Sakaida, Isao
author_facet Nagao, Misato
Nishikawa, Jun
Ogawa, Ryo
Sasaki, Sho
Nakamura, Munetaka
Nishimura, Junichi
Goto, Atsushi
Hashimoto, Shinichi
Okamoto, Takeshi
Suenaga, Masato
Hamamoto, Yoshihiko
Sakaida, Isao
author_sort Nagao, Misato
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the utility of optical enhancement (OE) in early gastric cancer demarcation. Twenty lesions of early gastric cancer were examined by PENTAX endoscopy system with OE-1 and OE-2 functions. The areas of tumor demarcation identified by 12 evaluators (6 novice and 6 experienced) were compared to the corresponding correct areas determined by postoperative histopathology findings. The misdiagnosed scores that were the sums of false-positive and false-negative areas were compared. Color of one hundred pixels from the inside of the cancerous area and the outside of the cancerous area was expressed as three-dimensional RGB component vectors. The mean vectors and covariance matrixes were calculated and the Mahalanobis distance, indicative of color differences between two areas, was tested. Comparisons of the misdiagnosed score revealed that OE-1 was preferred over WL-1 for gastric cancer demarcation for all 12 evaluators (p = 0.008) and in novice evaluators (p = 0.026). OE-2 was not significantly different from WL-2 in all cases. OE-1 images gave significantly larger Mahalanobis distances, indicative of color differences, than WL-1 images (p = 0.002). It was demonstrated that the OE Mode 1 has a significant advantage over the white light mode in demarcation of early gastric cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5059582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50595822016-10-23 Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer Demarcation Nagao, Misato Nishikawa, Jun Ogawa, Ryo Sasaki, Sho Nakamura, Munetaka Nishimura, Junichi Goto, Atsushi Hashimoto, Shinichi Okamoto, Takeshi Suenaga, Masato Hamamoto, Yoshihiko Sakaida, Isao Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article This study aimed to evaluate the utility of optical enhancement (OE) in early gastric cancer demarcation. Twenty lesions of early gastric cancer were examined by PENTAX endoscopy system with OE-1 and OE-2 functions. The areas of tumor demarcation identified by 12 evaluators (6 novice and 6 experienced) were compared to the corresponding correct areas determined by postoperative histopathology findings. The misdiagnosed scores that were the sums of false-positive and false-negative areas were compared. Color of one hundred pixels from the inside of the cancerous area and the outside of the cancerous area was expressed as three-dimensional RGB component vectors. The mean vectors and covariance matrixes were calculated and the Mahalanobis distance, indicative of color differences between two areas, was tested. Comparisons of the misdiagnosed score revealed that OE-1 was preferred over WL-1 for gastric cancer demarcation for all 12 evaluators (p = 0.008) and in novice evaluators (p = 0.026). OE-2 was not significantly different from WL-2 in all cases. OE-1 images gave significantly larger Mahalanobis distances, indicative of color differences, than WL-1 images (p = 0.002). It was demonstrated that the OE Mode 1 has a significant advantage over the white light mode in demarcation of early gastric cancer. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5059582/ /pubmed/27774101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2439621 Text en Copyright © 2016 Misato Nagao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nagao, Misato
Nishikawa, Jun
Ogawa, Ryo
Sasaki, Sho
Nakamura, Munetaka
Nishimura, Junichi
Goto, Atsushi
Hashimoto, Shinichi
Okamoto, Takeshi
Suenaga, Masato
Hamamoto, Yoshihiko
Sakaida, Isao
Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer Demarcation
title Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer Demarcation
title_full Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer Demarcation
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer Demarcation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer Demarcation
title_short Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer Demarcation
title_sort evaluation of the diagnostic ability of optical enhancement system in early gastric cancer demarcation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5059582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2439621
work_keys_str_mv AT nagaomisato evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation
AT nishikawajun evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation
AT ogawaryo evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation
AT sasakisho evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation
AT nakamuramunetaka evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation
AT nishimurajunichi evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation
AT gotoatsushi evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation
AT hashimotoshinichi evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation
AT okamototakeshi evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation
AT suenagamasato evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation
AT hamamotoyoshihiko evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation
AT sakaidaisao evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation