Cargando…
Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer Demarcation
This study aimed to evaluate the utility of optical enhancement (OE) in early gastric cancer demarcation. Twenty lesions of early gastric cancer were examined by PENTAX endoscopy system with OE-1 and OE-2 functions. The areas of tumor demarcation identified by 12 evaluators (6 novice and 6 experienc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5059582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2439621 |
_version_ | 1782459434186833920 |
---|---|
author | Nagao, Misato Nishikawa, Jun Ogawa, Ryo Sasaki, Sho Nakamura, Munetaka Nishimura, Junichi Goto, Atsushi Hashimoto, Shinichi Okamoto, Takeshi Suenaga, Masato Hamamoto, Yoshihiko Sakaida, Isao |
author_facet | Nagao, Misato Nishikawa, Jun Ogawa, Ryo Sasaki, Sho Nakamura, Munetaka Nishimura, Junichi Goto, Atsushi Hashimoto, Shinichi Okamoto, Takeshi Suenaga, Masato Hamamoto, Yoshihiko Sakaida, Isao |
author_sort | Nagao, Misato |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to evaluate the utility of optical enhancement (OE) in early gastric cancer demarcation. Twenty lesions of early gastric cancer were examined by PENTAX endoscopy system with OE-1 and OE-2 functions. The areas of tumor demarcation identified by 12 evaluators (6 novice and 6 experienced) were compared to the corresponding correct areas determined by postoperative histopathology findings. The misdiagnosed scores that were the sums of false-positive and false-negative areas were compared. Color of one hundred pixels from the inside of the cancerous area and the outside of the cancerous area was expressed as three-dimensional RGB component vectors. The mean vectors and covariance matrixes were calculated and the Mahalanobis distance, indicative of color differences between two areas, was tested. Comparisons of the misdiagnosed score revealed that OE-1 was preferred over WL-1 for gastric cancer demarcation for all 12 evaluators (p = 0.008) and in novice evaluators (p = 0.026). OE-2 was not significantly different from WL-2 in all cases. OE-1 images gave significantly larger Mahalanobis distances, indicative of color differences, than WL-1 images (p = 0.002). It was demonstrated that the OE Mode 1 has a significant advantage over the white light mode in demarcation of early gastric cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5059582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50595822016-10-23 Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer Demarcation Nagao, Misato Nishikawa, Jun Ogawa, Ryo Sasaki, Sho Nakamura, Munetaka Nishimura, Junichi Goto, Atsushi Hashimoto, Shinichi Okamoto, Takeshi Suenaga, Masato Hamamoto, Yoshihiko Sakaida, Isao Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article This study aimed to evaluate the utility of optical enhancement (OE) in early gastric cancer demarcation. Twenty lesions of early gastric cancer were examined by PENTAX endoscopy system with OE-1 and OE-2 functions. The areas of tumor demarcation identified by 12 evaluators (6 novice and 6 experienced) were compared to the corresponding correct areas determined by postoperative histopathology findings. The misdiagnosed scores that were the sums of false-positive and false-negative areas were compared. Color of one hundred pixels from the inside of the cancerous area and the outside of the cancerous area was expressed as three-dimensional RGB component vectors. The mean vectors and covariance matrixes were calculated and the Mahalanobis distance, indicative of color differences between two areas, was tested. Comparisons of the misdiagnosed score revealed that OE-1 was preferred over WL-1 for gastric cancer demarcation for all 12 evaluators (p = 0.008) and in novice evaluators (p = 0.026). OE-2 was not significantly different from WL-2 in all cases. OE-1 images gave significantly larger Mahalanobis distances, indicative of color differences, than WL-1 images (p = 0.002). It was demonstrated that the OE Mode 1 has a significant advantage over the white light mode in demarcation of early gastric cancer. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5059582/ /pubmed/27774101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2439621 Text en Copyright © 2016 Misato Nagao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nagao, Misato Nishikawa, Jun Ogawa, Ryo Sasaki, Sho Nakamura, Munetaka Nishimura, Junichi Goto, Atsushi Hashimoto, Shinichi Okamoto, Takeshi Suenaga, Masato Hamamoto, Yoshihiko Sakaida, Isao Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer Demarcation |
title | Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer Demarcation |
title_full | Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer Demarcation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer Demarcation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer Demarcation |
title_short | Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer Demarcation |
title_sort | evaluation of the diagnostic ability of optical enhancement system in early gastric cancer demarcation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5059582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2439621 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nagaomisato evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation AT nishikawajun evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation AT ogawaryo evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation AT sasakisho evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation AT nakamuramunetaka evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation AT nishimurajunichi evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation AT gotoatsushi evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation AT hashimotoshinichi evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation AT okamototakeshi evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation AT suenagamasato evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation AT hamamotoyoshihiko evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation AT sakaidaisao evaluationofthediagnosticabilityofopticalenhancementsysteminearlygastriccancerdemarcation |