Cargando…

Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Candidates using a Non-linguistic Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection Test

Adults who score 50% correct or less in open-set sentence recognition test under the best aided listening condition may be considered as candidates for cochlear implant (CI). However, the requirement for ‘the best aided listening condition’ needs significant time and clinical resources to ensure suc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Ji Eun, Hong, Sung Hwa, Won, Jong Ho, Park, Hee-Sung, Cho, Young Sang, Chung, Won-Ho, Cho, Yang-Sun, Moon, Il Joon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5059668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27731425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35235
_version_ 1782459452277915648
author Choi, Ji Eun
Hong, Sung Hwa
Won, Jong Ho
Park, Hee-Sung
Cho, Young Sang
Chung, Won-Ho
Cho, Yang-Sun
Moon, Il Joon
author_facet Choi, Ji Eun
Hong, Sung Hwa
Won, Jong Ho
Park, Hee-Sung
Cho, Young Sang
Chung, Won-Ho
Cho, Yang-Sun
Moon, Il Joon
author_sort Choi, Ji Eun
collection PubMed
description Adults who score 50% correct or less in open-set sentence recognition test under the best aided listening condition may be considered as candidates for cochlear implant (CI). However, the requirement for ‘the best aided listening condition’ needs significant time and clinical resources to ensure such condition. As speech signals are composed of dynamic spectral and temporal modulations, psychoacoustic sensitivity to the combinations of spectral and temporal modulation cues may be a strong predictor for aided speech recognition. In this study, we tested 27 adults with moderately severe to profound hearing loss to explore the possibility that a non-linguistic unaided spectrotemporal modulation (STM) detection test might be a viable option as a surrogate measure to evaluate CI candidacy. Our results showed that STM detection thresholds were significantly correlated with aided sentence recognition scores for the 27 hearing impaired listeners. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that the CI candidacy evaluation by both unaided STM detection test and the traditional best-aided sentence recognition test was fairly consistent. More specifically, our results demonstrated that the STM detection test using a low spectral and temporal modulation rate might provide an efficient process for CI candidacy evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5059668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50596682016-10-24 Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Candidates using a Non-linguistic Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection Test Choi, Ji Eun Hong, Sung Hwa Won, Jong Ho Park, Hee-Sung Cho, Young Sang Chung, Won-Ho Cho, Yang-Sun Moon, Il Joon Sci Rep Article Adults who score 50% correct or less in open-set sentence recognition test under the best aided listening condition may be considered as candidates for cochlear implant (CI). However, the requirement for ‘the best aided listening condition’ needs significant time and clinical resources to ensure such condition. As speech signals are composed of dynamic spectral and temporal modulations, psychoacoustic sensitivity to the combinations of spectral and temporal modulation cues may be a strong predictor for aided speech recognition. In this study, we tested 27 adults with moderately severe to profound hearing loss to explore the possibility that a non-linguistic unaided spectrotemporal modulation (STM) detection test might be a viable option as a surrogate measure to evaluate CI candidacy. Our results showed that STM detection thresholds were significantly correlated with aided sentence recognition scores for the 27 hearing impaired listeners. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that the CI candidacy evaluation by both unaided STM detection test and the traditional best-aided sentence recognition test was fairly consistent. More specifically, our results demonstrated that the STM detection test using a low spectral and temporal modulation rate might provide an efficient process for CI candidacy evaluation. Nature Publishing Group 2016-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5059668/ /pubmed/27731425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35235 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Choi, Ji Eun
Hong, Sung Hwa
Won, Jong Ho
Park, Hee-Sung
Cho, Young Sang
Chung, Won-Ho
Cho, Yang-Sun
Moon, Il Joon
Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Candidates using a Non-linguistic Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection Test
title Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Candidates using a Non-linguistic Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection Test
title_full Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Candidates using a Non-linguistic Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection Test
title_fullStr Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Candidates using a Non-linguistic Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection Test
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Candidates using a Non-linguistic Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection Test
title_short Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Candidates using a Non-linguistic Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection Test
title_sort evaluation of cochlear implant candidates using a non-linguistic spectrotemporal modulation detection test
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5059668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27731425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35235
work_keys_str_mv AT choijieun evaluationofcochlearimplantcandidatesusinganonlinguisticspectrotemporalmodulationdetectiontest
AT hongsunghwa evaluationofcochlearimplantcandidatesusinganonlinguisticspectrotemporalmodulationdetectiontest
AT wonjongho evaluationofcochlearimplantcandidatesusinganonlinguisticspectrotemporalmodulationdetectiontest
AT parkheesung evaluationofcochlearimplantcandidatesusinganonlinguisticspectrotemporalmodulationdetectiontest
AT choyoungsang evaluationofcochlearimplantcandidatesusinganonlinguisticspectrotemporalmodulationdetectiontest
AT chungwonho evaluationofcochlearimplantcandidatesusinganonlinguisticspectrotemporalmodulationdetectiontest
AT choyangsun evaluationofcochlearimplantcandidatesusinganonlinguisticspectrotemporalmodulationdetectiontest
AT mooniljoon evaluationofcochlearimplantcandidatesusinganonlinguisticspectrotemporalmodulationdetectiontest