Cargando…

Motivational context for response inhibition influences proactive involvement of attention

Motoric inhibition is ingrained in human cognition and implicated in pervasive neurological diseases and disorders. The present electroencephalographic (EEG) study investigated proactive motivational adjustments in attention during response inhibition. We compared go-trial data from a stop-signal ta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langford, Zachary D., Schevernels, Hanne, Boehler, C. Nico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5059723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27731348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35122
_version_ 1782459464505360384
author Langford, Zachary D.
Schevernels, Hanne
Boehler, C. Nico
author_facet Langford, Zachary D.
Schevernels, Hanne
Boehler, C. Nico
author_sort Langford, Zachary D.
collection PubMed
description Motoric inhibition is ingrained in human cognition and implicated in pervasive neurological diseases and disorders. The present electroencephalographic (EEG) study investigated proactive motivational adjustments in attention during response inhibition. We compared go-trial data from a stop-signal task, in which infrequently presented stop-signals required response cancellation without extrinsic incentives (“standard-stop”), to data where a monetary reward was posted on some stop-signals (“rewarded-stop”). A novel EEG analysis was used to directly model the covariation between response time and the attention-related N1 component. A positive relationship between response time and N1 amplitudes was found in the standard-stop context, but not in the rewarded-stop context. Simultaneously, average go-trial N1 amplitudes were larger in the rewarded-stop context. This suggests that down-regulation of go-signal-directed attention is dynamically adjusted in the standard-stop trials, but is overridden by a more generalized increase in attention in reward-motivated trials. Further, a diffusion process model indicated that behavior between contexts was the result of partially opposing evidence accumulation processes. Together these analyses suggest that response inhibition relies on dynamic and flexible proactive adjustments of low-level processes and that contextual changes can alter their interplay. This could prove to have ramifications for clinical disorders involving deficient response inhibition and impulsivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5059723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50597232016-10-24 Motivational context for response inhibition influences proactive involvement of attention Langford, Zachary D. Schevernels, Hanne Boehler, C. Nico Sci Rep Article Motoric inhibition is ingrained in human cognition and implicated in pervasive neurological diseases and disorders. The present electroencephalographic (EEG) study investigated proactive motivational adjustments in attention during response inhibition. We compared go-trial data from a stop-signal task, in which infrequently presented stop-signals required response cancellation without extrinsic incentives (“standard-stop”), to data where a monetary reward was posted on some stop-signals (“rewarded-stop”). A novel EEG analysis was used to directly model the covariation between response time and the attention-related N1 component. A positive relationship between response time and N1 amplitudes was found in the standard-stop context, but not in the rewarded-stop context. Simultaneously, average go-trial N1 amplitudes were larger in the rewarded-stop context. This suggests that down-regulation of go-signal-directed attention is dynamically adjusted in the standard-stop trials, but is overridden by a more generalized increase in attention in reward-motivated trials. Further, a diffusion process model indicated that behavior between contexts was the result of partially opposing evidence accumulation processes. Together these analyses suggest that response inhibition relies on dynamic and flexible proactive adjustments of low-level processes and that contextual changes can alter their interplay. This could prove to have ramifications for clinical disorders involving deficient response inhibition and impulsivity. Nature Publishing Group 2016-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5059723/ /pubmed/27731348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35122 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Langford, Zachary D.
Schevernels, Hanne
Boehler, C. Nico
Motivational context for response inhibition influences proactive involvement of attention
title Motivational context for response inhibition influences proactive involvement of attention
title_full Motivational context for response inhibition influences proactive involvement of attention
title_fullStr Motivational context for response inhibition influences proactive involvement of attention
title_full_unstemmed Motivational context for response inhibition influences proactive involvement of attention
title_short Motivational context for response inhibition influences proactive involvement of attention
title_sort motivational context for response inhibition influences proactive involvement of attention
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5059723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27731348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35122
work_keys_str_mv AT langfordzacharyd motivationalcontextforresponseinhibitioninfluencesproactiveinvolvementofattention
AT schevernelshanne motivationalcontextforresponseinhibitioninfluencesproactiveinvolvementofattention
AT boehlercnico motivationalcontextforresponseinhibitioninfluencesproactiveinvolvementofattention