Cargando…

How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think‐aloud study

BACKGROUND: The English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme biennially invites individuals aged 60–74 to participate in screening. The booklet, ‘Bowel Cancer Screening: The Facts' accompanies this invitation. Its primary aim is to inform potential participants about the aims, advantages and di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Samuel G., Vart, Gemma, Wolf, Michael S., Obichere, Austin, Baker, Helen J., Raine, Rosalind, Wardle, Jane, von Wagner, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5060830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23910930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12117
_version_ 1782459525728567296
author Smith, Samuel G.
Vart, Gemma
Wolf, Michael S.
Obichere, Austin
Baker, Helen J.
Raine, Rosalind
Wardle, Jane
von Wagner, Christian
author_facet Smith, Samuel G.
Vart, Gemma
Wolf, Michael S.
Obichere, Austin
Baker, Helen J.
Raine, Rosalind
Wardle, Jane
von Wagner, Christian
author_sort Smith, Samuel G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme biennially invites individuals aged 60–74 to participate in screening. The booklet, ‘Bowel Cancer Screening: The Facts' accompanies this invitation. Its primary aim is to inform potential participants about the aims, advantages and disadvantages of colorectal cancer screening. OBJECTIVE: To provide detailed commentary on how individuals process the information contained within ‘The Facts’ booklet. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This study comprised of 18 interviews with individuals aged 45–60 and used a ‘think‐aloud’ paradigm in which participants read aloud the booklet. Participant utterances (verbal statements made in response to researcher‐led prompts) were transcribed and analysed using a combination of content and thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 776 coded utterances were analysed (mean = 43.1 per person; range = 8–95). While overall comprehension was satisfactory, several problem areas were identified such as the use of complex unfamiliar terminology and the presentation of numerical information. Specific sections such as colonoscopy risk information evoked negative emotional responses. Participants made several suggestions for ways in which comprehension might be improved. CONCLUSION: Public perceptions of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme information materials indicated that specific aspects of the booklet were difficult to process. These materials may be an appropriate target to improve public understanding of the aims, benefits and disadvantages of colorectal cancer screening. These findings will contribute to a broader NIHR‐funded project that aims to design a supplementary ‘gist‐based’ information leaflet suitable for low literacy populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5060830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50608302016-12-07 How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think‐aloud study Smith, Samuel G. Vart, Gemma Wolf, Michael S. Obichere, Austin Baker, Helen J. Raine, Rosalind Wardle, Jane von Wagner, Christian Health Expect Original Research Papers BACKGROUND: The English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme biennially invites individuals aged 60–74 to participate in screening. The booklet, ‘Bowel Cancer Screening: The Facts' accompanies this invitation. Its primary aim is to inform potential participants about the aims, advantages and disadvantages of colorectal cancer screening. OBJECTIVE: To provide detailed commentary on how individuals process the information contained within ‘The Facts’ booklet. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This study comprised of 18 interviews with individuals aged 45–60 and used a ‘think‐aloud’ paradigm in which participants read aloud the booklet. Participant utterances (verbal statements made in response to researcher‐led prompts) were transcribed and analysed using a combination of content and thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 776 coded utterances were analysed (mean = 43.1 per person; range = 8–95). While overall comprehension was satisfactory, several problem areas were identified such as the use of complex unfamiliar terminology and the presentation of numerical information. Specific sections such as colonoscopy risk information evoked negative emotional responses. Participants made several suggestions for ways in which comprehension might be improved. CONCLUSION: Public perceptions of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme information materials indicated that specific aspects of the booklet were difficult to process. These materials may be an appropriate target to improve public understanding of the aims, benefits and disadvantages of colorectal cancer screening. These findings will contribute to a broader NIHR‐funded project that aims to design a supplementary ‘gist‐based’ information leaflet suitable for low literacy populations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2013-08-05 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5060830/ /pubmed/23910930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12117 Text en © 2013 The Authors Health Expectations Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Papers
Smith, Samuel G.
Vart, Gemma
Wolf, Michael S.
Obichere, Austin
Baker, Helen J.
Raine, Rosalind
Wardle, Jane
von Wagner, Christian
How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think‐aloud study
title How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think‐aloud study
title_full How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think‐aloud study
title_fullStr How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think‐aloud study
title_full_unstemmed How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think‐aloud study
title_short How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think‐aloud study
title_sort how do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think‐aloud study
topic Original Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5060830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23910930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12117
work_keys_str_mv AT smithsamuelg howdopeopleinterpretinformationaboutcolorectalcancerscreeningobservationsfromathinkaloudstudy
AT vartgemma howdopeopleinterpretinformationaboutcolorectalcancerscreeningobservationsfromathinkaloudstudy
AT wolfmichaels howdopeopleinterpretinformationaboutcolorectalcancerscreeningobservationsfromathinkaloudstudy
AT obichereaustin howdopeopleinterpretinformationaboutcolorectalcancerscreeningobservationsfromathinkaloudstudy
AT bakerhelenj howdopeopleinterpretinformationaboutcolorectalcancerscreeningobservationsfromathinkaloudstudy
AT rainerosalind howdopeopleinterpretinformationaboutcolorectalcancerscreeningobservationsfromathinkaloudstudy
AT wardlejane howdopeopleinterpretinformationaboutcolorectalcancerscreeningobservationsfromathinkaloudstudy
AT vonwagnerchristian howdopeopleinterpretinformationaboutcolorectalcancerscreeningobservationsfromathinkaloudstudy