Cargando…

No differences in visual theory of mind abilities between euthymic bipolar patients and healthy controls

BACKGROUND: Research on theory of mind (ToM) abilities in patients with bipolar disorder has yielded conflicting results. Meta-analyses point to a stable moderate impairment in remitted patients, but factors such as subsyndromal symptoms, illness severity, and deficits in basic neurocognitive functi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haag, Silvia, Haffner, Paula, Quinlivan, Esther, Brüne, Martin, Stamm, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5061679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27734416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-016-0061-5
_version_ 1782459631648374784
author Haag, Silvia
Haffner, Paula
Quinlivan, Esther
Brüne, Martin
Stamm, Thomas
author_facet Haag, Silvia
Haffner, Paula
Quinlivan, Esther
Brüne, Martin
Stamm, Thomas
author_sort Haag, Silvia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research on theory of mind (ToM) abilities in patients with bipolar disorder has yielded conflicting results. Meta-analyses point to a stable moderate impairment in remitted patients, but factors such as subsyndromal symptoms, illness severity, and deficits in basic neurocognitive functions might act as confounders. Also, differences in deficits depending on task area (cognitive or affective) or task modality (visual or verbal) have been observed. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that euthymic bipolar patients would perform more poorly than healthy subjects on visual cognitive and visual affective ToM tasks. Furthermore, we aimed to explore the relationship between ToM performance and basic neurocognitive functions, subsyndromal symptom severity, and illness burden. Twenty-nine clinically stable outpatients with bipolar disorder and 29 healthy comparison subjects completed a measure of visual cognitive ToM (Mental State Attribution Task, MSAT), a measure of visual affective ToM (Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, RMET), and a battery of tests assessing neurocognitive functioning (attention, verbal memory, executive functions, and intelligence). RESULTS: Patients did not differ significantly from healthy controls for the ToM tasks or any of the neurocognitive measures, suggesting a high level of neurocognitive functioning in the bipolar group. On average, patients were slower than controls to complete the ToM tasks. Within the bipolar group, ToM performance was moderately correlated with attention, verbal memory and reasoning abilities. Performance on the RMET was positively correlated with clinician-rated depressive symptoms with a small effect. Number of years of illness was weakly and negatively correlated with performance on the MSAT. Overall, no moderate or strong correlations were found between ToM performance, subsyndromal depressive or manic symptoms, illness duration, and number of depressive or (hypo)manic episodes. Moderate correlations between ToM performance and age were found for patients but nor for controls. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest preserved visual cognitive and affective ToM abilities in euthymic bipolar patients characterized by a high level of neurocognitive functioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5061679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50616792016-10-27 No differences in visual theory of mind abilities between euthymic bipolar patients and healthy controls Haag, Silvia Haffner, Paula Quinlivan, Esther Brüne, Martin Stamm, Thomas Int J Bipolar Disord Research BACKGROUND: Research on theory of mind (ToM) abilities in patients with bipolar disorder has yielded conflicting results. Meta-analyses point to a stable moderate impairment in remitted patients, but factors such as subsyndromal symptoms, illness severity, and deficits in basic neurocognitive functions might act as confounders. Also, differences in deficits depending on task area (cognitive or affective) or task modality (visual or verbal) have been observed. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that euthymic bipolar patients would perform more poorly than healthy subjects on visual cognitive and visual affective ToM tasks. Furthermore, we aimed to explore the relationship between ToM performance and basic neurocognitive functions, subsyndromal symptom severity, and illness burden. Twenty-nine clinically stable outpatients with bipolar disorder and 29 healthy comparison subjects completed a measure of visual cognitive ToM (Mental State Attribution Task, MSAT), a measure of visual affective ToM (Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, RMET), and a battery of tests assessing neurocognitive functioning (attention, verbal memory, executive functions, and intelligence). RESULTS: Patients did not differ significantly from healthy controls for the ToM tasks or any of the neurocognitive measures, suggesting a high level of neurocognitive functioning in the bipolar group. On average, patients were slower than controls to complete the ToM tasks. Within the bipolar group, ToM performance was moderately correlated with attention, verbal memory and reasoning abilities. Performance on the RMET was positively correlated with clinician-rated depressive symptoms with a small effect. Number of years of illness was weakly and negatively correlated with performance on the MSAT. Overall, no moderate or strong correlations were found between ToM performance, subsyndromal depressive or manic symptoms, illness duration, and number of depressive or (hypo)manic episodes. Moderate correlations between ToM performance and age were found for patients but nor for controls. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest preserved visual cognitive and affective ToM abilities in euthymic bipolar patients characterized by a high level of neurocognitive functioning. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5061679/ /pubmed/27734416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-016-0061-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Haag, Silvia
Haffner, Paula
Quinlivan, Esther
Brüne, Martin
Stamm, Thomas
No differences in visual theory of mind abilities between euthymic bipolar patients and healthy controls
title No differences in visual theory of mind abilities between euthymic bipolar patients and healthy controls
title_full No differences in visual theory of mind abilities between euthymic bipolar patients and healthy controls
title_fullStr No differences in visual theory of mind abilities between euthymic bipolar patients and healthy controls
title_full_unstemmed No differences in visual theory of mind abilities between euthymic bipolar patients and healthy controls
title_short No differences in visual theory of mind abilities between euthymic bipolar patients and healthy controls
title_sort no differences in visual theory of mind abilities between euthymic bipolar patients and healthy controls
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5061679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27734416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-016-0061-5
work_keys_str_mv AT haagsilvia nodifferencesinvisualtheoryofmindabilitiesbetweeneuthymicbipolarpatientsandhealthycontrols
AT haffnerpaula nodifferencesinvisualtheoryofmindabilitiesbetweeneuthymicbipolarpatientsandhealthycontrols
AT quinlivanesther nodifferencesinvisualtheoryofmindabilitiesbetweeneuthymicbipolarpatientsandhealthycontrols
AT brunemartin nodifferencesinvisualtheoryofmindabilitiesbetweeneuthymicbipolarpatientsandhealthycontrols
AT stammthomas nodifferencesinvisualtheoryofmindabilitiesbetweeneuthymicbipolarpatientsandhealthycontrols