Cargando…
Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina)
The gut microbiota has many beneficial effects on host metabolism and health, and its composition is determined by numerous factors. It is also assumed that there was a co‐evolution of mammals and the bacteria inhabiting their gut. Current knowledge of the mammalian gut microbiota mainly derives fro...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5061715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27734626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.369 |
_version_ | 1782459634589630464 |
---|---|
author | Numberger, Daniela Herlemann, Daniel P. R. Jürgens, Klaus Dehnhardt, Guido Schulz‐Vogt, Heide |
author_facet | Numberger, Daniela Herlemann, Daniel P. R. Jürgens, Klaus Dehnhardt, Guido Schulz‐Vogt, Heide |
author_sort | Numberger, Daniela |
collection | PubMed |
description | The gut microbiota has many beneficial effects on host metabolism and health, and its composition is determined by numerous factors. It is also assumed that there was a co‐evolution of mammals and the bacteria inhabiting their gut. Current knowledge of the mammalian gut microbiota mainly derives from studies on humans and terrestrial animals, whereas those on marine mammals are sparse. However, they could provide additional information on influencing factors, such as the role of diet and co‐evolution with the host. In this study, we investigated and compared the bacterial diversity in the feces of five male harbor seals (Phoca vitulina). Because this small population included two half‐brother pairs, each sharing a common father, it allowed an evaluation of the impact of host relatedness or genetic similarity on the gut microbial community. Fresh feces obtained from the seals by an enema were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. The results showed that the bacterial communities in the seals' feces mainly consisted of the phyla Firmicutes (19–43%), Bacteroidetes (22–36%), Fusobacteria (18–32%), and Proteobacteria (5–17%) . Twenty‐one bacterial members present in the fecal samples of the five seals contributed an average relative abundance of 93.7 + 8.7% of the total fecal microbial community. Contrary to all expectations based on previous studies a comparison of the fecal community between individual seals showed a higher similarity between unrelated than related individuals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5061715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50617152016-10-24 Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) Numberger, Daniela Herlemann, Daniel P. R. Jürgens, Klaus Dehnhardt, Guido Schulz‐Vogt, Heide Microbiologyopen Original Research The gut microbiota has many beneficial effects on host metabolism and health, and its composition is determined by numerous factors. It is also assumed that there was a co‐evolution of mammals and the bacteria inhabiting their gut. Current knowledge of the mammalian gut microbiota mainly derives from studies on humans and terrestrial animals, whereas those on marine mammals are sparse. However, they could provide additional information on influencing factors, such as the role of diet and co‐evolution with the host. In this study, we investigated and compared the bacterial diversity in the feces of five male harbor seals (Phoca vitulina). Because this small population included two half‐brother pairs, each sharing a common father, it allowed an evaluation of the impact of host relatedness or genetic similarity on the gut microbial community. Fresh feces obtained from the seals by an enema were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. The results showed that the bacterial communities in the seals' feces mainly consisted of the phyla Firmicutes (19–43%), Bacteroidetes (22–36%), Fusobacteria (18–32%), and Proteobacteria (5–17%) . Twenty‐one bacterial members present in the fecal samples of the five seals contributed an average relative abundance of 93.7 + 8.7% of the total fecal microbial community. Contrary to all expectations based on previous studies a comparison of the fecal community between individual seals showed a higher similarity between unrelated than related individuals. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5061715/ /pubmed/27734626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.369 Text en © 2016 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Numberger, Daniela Herlemann, Daniel P. R. Jürgens, Klaus Dehnhardt, Guido Schulz‐Vogt, Heide Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) |
title | Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) |
title_full | Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) |
title_short | Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) |
title_sort | comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (phoca vitulina) |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5061715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27734626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.369 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT numbergerdaniela comparativeanalysisofthefecalbacterialcommunityoffiveharborsealsphocavitulina AT herlemanndanielpr comparativeanalysisofthefecalbacterialcommunityoffiveharborsealsphocavitulina AT jurgensklaus comparativeanalysisofthefecalbacterialcommunityoffiveharborsealsphocavitulina AT dehnhardtguido comparativeanalysisofthefecalbacterialcommunityoffiveharborsealsphocavitulina AT schulzvogtheide comparativeanalysisofthefecalbacterialcommunityoffiveharborsealsphocavitulina |