Cargando…

Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina)

The gut microbiota has many beneficial effects on host metabolism and health, and its composition is determined by numerous factors. It is also assumed that there was a co‐evolution of mammals and the bacteria inhabiting their gut. Current knowledge of the mammalian gut microbiota mainly derives fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Numberger, Daniela, Herlemann, Daniel P. R., Jürgens, Klaus, Dehnhardt, Guido, Schulz‐Vogt, Heide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5061715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27734626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.369
_version_ 1782459634589630464
author Numberger, Daniela
Herlemann, Daniel P. R.
Jürgens, Klaus
Dehnhardt, Guido
Schulz‐Vogt, Heide
author_facet Numberger, Daniela
Herlemann, Daniel P. R.
Jürgens, Klaus
Dehnhardt, Guido
Schulz‐Vogt, Heide
author_sort Numberger, Daniela
collection PubMed
description The gut microbiota has many beneficial effects on host metabolism and health, and its composition is determined by numerous factors. It is also assumed that there was a co‐evolution of mammals and the bacteria inhabiting their gut. Current knowledge of the mammalian gut microbiota mainly derives from studies on humans and terrestrial animals, whereas those on marine mammals are sparse. However, they could provide additional information on influencing factors, such as the role of diet and co‐evolution with the host. In this study, we investigated and compared the bacterial diversity in the feces of five male harbor seals (Phoca vitulina). Because this small population included two half‐brother pairs, each sharing a common father, it allowed an evaluation of the impact of host relatedness or genetic similarity on the gut microbial community. Fresh feces obtained from the seals by an enema were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. The results showed that the bacterial communities in the seals' feces mainly consisted of the phyla Firmicutes (19–43%), Bacteroidetes (22–36%), Fusobacteria (18–32%), and Proteobacteria (5–17%) . Twenty‐one bacterial members present in the fecal samples of the five seals contributed an average relative abundance of 93.7 + 8.7% of the total fecal microbial community. Contrary to all expectations based on previous studies a comparison of the fecal community between individual seals showed a higher similarity between unrelated than related individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5061715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50617152016-10-24 Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) Numberger, Daniela Herlemann, Daniel P. R. Jürgens, Klaus Dehnhardt, Guido Schulz‐Vogt, Heide Microbiologyopen Original Research The gut microbiota has many beneficial effects on host metabolism and health, and its composition is determined by numerous factors. It is also assumed that there was a co‐evolution of mammals and the bacteria inhabiting their gut. Current knowledge of the mammalian gut microbiota mainly derives from studies on humans and terrestrial animals, whereas those on marine mammals are sparse. However, they could provide additional information on influencing factors, such as the role of diet and co‐evolution with the host. In this study, we investigated and compared the bacterial diversity in the feces of five male harbor seals (Phoca vitulina). Because this small population included two half‐brother pairs, each sharing a common father, it allowed an evaluation of the impact of host relatedness or genetic similarity on the gut microbial community. Fresh feces obtained from the seals by an enema were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. The results showed that the bacterial communities in the seals' feces mainly consisted of the phyla Firmicutes (19–43%), Bacteroidetes (22–36%), Fusobacteria (18–32%), and Proteobacteria (5–17%) . Twenty‐one bacterial members present in the fecal samples of the five seals contributed an average relative abundance of 93.7 + 8.7% of the total fecal microbial community. Contrary to all expectations based on previous studies a comparison of the fecal community between individual seals showed a higher similarity between unrelated than related individuals. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5061715/ /pubmed/27734626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.369 Text en © 2016 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Numberger, Daniela
Herlemann, Daniel P. R.
Jürgens, Klaus
Dehnhardt, Guido
Schulz‐Vogt, Heide
Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina)
title Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina)
title_full Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina)
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina)
title_short Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina)
title_sort comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (phoca vitulina)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5061715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27734626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.369
work_keys_str_mv AT numbergerdaniela comparativeanalysisofthefecalbacterialcommunityoffiveharborsealsphocavitulina
AT herlemanndanielpr comparativeanalysisofthefecalbacterialcommunityoffiveharborsealsphocavitulina
AT jurgensklaus comparativeanalysisofthefecalbacterialcommunityoffiveharborsealsphocavitulina
AT dehnhardtguido comparativeanalysisofthefecalbacterialcommunityoffiveharborsealsphocavitulina
AT schulzvogtheide comparativeanalysisofthefecalbacterialcommunityoffiveharborsealsphocavitulina