Cargando…
Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial
Objective: To evaluate whether patients who had received early class III protraction facemask treatment were less likely to need orthognathic surgery compared with untreated controls. This paper is a 6-year follow-up of a previous clinical trial. Design: Multi-centre 2-arm parallel randomized contro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5062052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27564126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14653125.2016.1201302 |
_version_ | 1782459699724025856 |
---|---|
author | Mandall, Nicky Cousley, Richard DiBiase, Andrew Dyer, Fiona Littlewood, Simon Mattick, Rye Nute, Spencer J. Doherty, Barbara Stivaros, Nadia McDowall, Ross Shargill, Inderjit Worthington, Helen V. |
author_facet | Mandall, Nicky Cousley, Richard DiBiase, Andrew Dyer, Fiona Littlewood, Simon Mattick, Rye Nute, Spencer J. Doherty, Barbara Stivaros, Nadia McDowall, Ross Shargill, Inderjit Worthington, Helen V. |
author_sort | Mandall, Nicky |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To evaluate whether patients who had received early class III protraction facemask treatment were less likely to need orthognathic surgery compared with untreated controls. This paper is a 6-year follow-up of a previous clinical trial. Design: Multi-centre 2-arm parallel randomized controlled trial. Setting: Eight United Kingdom hospital orthodontic departments. Participants: Seventy three 7- to 9–year-old children. Method: Patients were randomly allocated, stratified for gender, into an early class III protraction facemask group (PFG) (n = 35) and a control/no treatment group (CG) (n = 38). The primary outcome, need for orthognathic surgery was assessed by panel consensus. Secondary outcomes were changed in skeletal pattern, overjet, Peer Assessment Rating (PAR), self-esteem and the oral aesthetic impact of malocclusion. The data were compared between baseline (DC1) and 6-year follow-up (DC4). A per-protocol analysis was carried out with n = 32 in the CG and n = 33 in the PFG. Results: Thirty six percent of the PFG needed orthognathic surgery, compared with 66% of the CG (P = 0.027). The odds of needing surgery was 3.5 times more likely when protraction facemask treatment was not used (odds ratio = 3.34 95% CI 1.21–9.24). The PFG exhibited a clockwise rotation and the CG an anti-clockwise rotation in the maxilla (regression coefficient 8.24 (SE 0.75); 95% CI 6.73–9.75; P < 0.001) and the mandible (regression coefficient 6.72 (SE 0.73); 95% CI 5.27–8.18; P < 0.001). Sixty eight per cent of the PFG maintained a positive overjet at 6-year follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences between the PFG and CG for skeletal/occlusal improvement, self-esteem or oral aesthetic impact. Conclusions: Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery. However, this effect cannot be explained by the maintenance of skeletal cephalometric change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5062052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50620522016-11-01 Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial Mandall, Nicky Cousley, Richard DiBiase, Andrew Dyer, Fiona Littlewood, Simon Mattick, Rye Nute, Spencer J. Doherty, Barbara Stivaros, Nadia McDowall, Ross Shargill, Inderjit Worthington, Helen V. J Orthod Scientific Section Objective: To evaluate whether patients who had received early class III protraction facemask treatment were less likely to need orthognathic surgery compared with untreated controls. This paper is a 6-year follow-up of a previous clinical trial. Design: Multi-centre 2-arm parallel randomized controlled trial. Setting: Eight United Kingdom hospital orthodontic departments. Participants: Seventy three 7- to 9–year-old children. Method: Patients were randomly allocated, stratified for gender, into an early class III protraction facemask group (PFG) (n = 35) and a control/no treatment group (CG) (n = 38). The primary outcome, need for orthognathic surgery was assessed by panel consensus. Secondary outcomes were changed in skeletal pattern, overjet, Peer Assessment Rating (PAR), self-esteem and the oral aesthetic impact of malocclusion. The data were compared between baseline (DC1) and 6-year follow-up (DC4). A per-protocol analysis was carried out with n = 32 in the CG and n = 33 in the PFG. Results: Thirty six percent of the PFG needed orthognathic surgery, compared with 66% of the CG (P = 0.027). The odds of needing surgery was 3.5 times more likely when protraction facemask treatment was not used (odds ratio = 3.34 95% CI 1.21–9.24). The PFG exhibited a clockwise rotation and the CG an anti-clockwise rotation in the maxilla (regression coefficient 8.24 (SE 0.75); 95% CI 6.73–9.75; P < 0.001) and the mandible (regression coefficient 6.72 (SE 0.73); 95% CI 5.27–8.18; P < 0.001). Sixty eight per cent of the PFG maintained a positive overjet at 6-year follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences between the PFG and CG for skeletal/occlusal improvement, self-esteem or oral aesthetic impact. Conclusions: Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery. However, this effect cannot be explained by the maintenance of skeletal cephalometric change. Taylor & Francis 2016-07-02 2016-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5062052/ /pubmed/27564126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14653125.2016.1201302 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Section Mandall, Nicky Cousley, Richard DiBiase, Andrew Dyer, Fiona Littlewood, Simon Mattick, Rye Nute, Spencer J. Doherty, Barbara Stivaros, Nadia McDowall, Ross Shargill, Inderjit Worthington, Helen V. Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial |
title | Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial |
title_full | Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial |
title_short | Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial |
title_sort | early class iii protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial |
topic | Scientific Section |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5062052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27564126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14653125.2016.1201302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mandallnicky earlyclassiiiprotractionfacemasktreatmentreducestheneedfororthognathicsurgeryamulticentretwoarmparallelrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cousleyrichard earlyclassiiiprotractionfacemasktreatmentreducestheneedfororthognathicsurgeryamulticentretwoarmparallelrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dibiaseandrew earlyclassiiiprotractionfacemasktreatmentreducestheneedfororthognathicsurgeryamulticentretwoarmparallelrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dyerfiona earlyclassiiiprotractionfacemasktreatmentreducestheneedfororthognathicsurgeryamulticentretwoarmparallelrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT littlewoodsimon earlyclassiiiprotractionfacemasktreatmentreducestheneedfororthognathicsurgeryamulticentretwoarmparallelrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mattickrye earlyclassiiiprotractionfacemasktreatmentreducestheneedfororthognathicsurgeryamulticentretwoarmparallelrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nutespencerj earlyclassiiiprotractionfacemasktreatmentreducestheneedfororthognathicsurgeryamulticentretwoarmparallelrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dohertybarbara earlyclassiiiprotractionfacemasktreatmentreducestheneedfororthognathicsurgeryamulticentretwoarmparallelrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stivarosnadia earlyclassiiiprotractionfacemasktreatmentreducestheneedfororthognathicsurgeryamulticentretwoarmparallelrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcdowallross earlyclassiiiprotractionfacemasktreatmentreducestheneedfororthognathicsurgeryamulticentretwoarmparallelrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shargillinderjit earlyclassiiiprotractionfacemasktreatmentreducestheneedfororthognathicsurgeryamulticentretwoarmparallelrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT worthingtonhelenv earlyclassiiiprotractionfacemasktreatmentreducestheneedfororthognathicsurgeryamulticentretwoarmparallelrandomizedcontrolledtrial |