Cargando…
The peatland vegetation burning debate: keep scientific critique in perspective. A response to Brown et al. and Douglas et al.
Autores principales: | Davies, G. Matt, Kettridge, Nicholas, Stoof, Cathelijne R., Gray, Alan, Marrs, Rob, Ascoli, Davide, Fernandes, Paulo M., Allen, Katherine A., Doerr, Stefan H., Clay, Gareth D., McMorrow, Julia, Vandvik, Vigdis |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5062110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28080979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0434 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The role of fire in UK peatland and moorland management: the need for informed, unbiased debate
por: Davies, G. Matt, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Response to Letter to Editor by Dr. Aminnejad et al.
por: Shahrokhirad, Reyhaneh, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Response to: gender differences on neuromuscular strategy during drop jump: a comment on Helm et al. (2019) by Di Giminiani et al.
por: Helm, M., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Reply to De Giorgi et al. Comment on “Kesić et al. Early Diagnostics of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Cancers 2022, 14, 1822”
por: Kesić, Vesna, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Reply to Aguenaou et al. Comment on “Muzzioli et al. Are Front-of-Pack Labels a Health Policy Tool? Nutrients 2022, 14, 771”
por: Muzzioli, Luca, et al.
Publicado: (2022)