Cargando…

Evaluation of five microbial and four mitochondrial DNA markers for tracking human and pig fecal pollution in freshwater

This study systematically evaluated five microbial and four mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) markers, including sensitivities and specificities under PCR method, and fecal concentrations and decay rates in water under qPCR method. The microbial DNA markers were the three human-associated (BacH, HF183 and B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Xiwei, Liu, Peng, Zheng, Guolu, Chen, Huimei, Shi, Wei, Cui, Yibin, Ren, Hongqiang, Zhang, Xu-Xiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5062121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27734941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35311
_version_ 1782459713443594240
author He, Xiwei
Liu, Peng
Zheng, Guolu
Chen, Huimei
Shi, Wei
Cui, Yibin
Ren, Hongqiang
Zhang, Xu-Xiang
author_facet He, Xiwei
Liu, Peng
Zheng, Guolu
Chen, Huimei
Shi, Wei
Cui, Yibin
Ren, Hongqiang
Zhang, Xu-Xiang
author_sort He, Xiwei
collection PubMed
description This study systematically evaluated five microbial and four mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) markers, including sensitivities and specificities under PCR method, and fecal concentrations and decay rates in water under qPCR method. The microbial DNA markers were the three human-associated (BacH, HF183 and B.adolescentis) and two pig-associated (Pig-2-Bac and L.amylovorus), while the mtDNA ones were two human- (H-ND6 and H-ND5) and two pig-associated (P-CytB and P-ND5). All the mtDNA markers showed higher sensitivity (100%) than the microbial ones (84.0–88.8%) except Pig-2-Bac (100%). Specificities of the human mtDNA markers (99.1 and 98.1%) were higher than those of the human-associated microbial ones (57.0–88.8%). But this pattern was not observed in the pig-associated markers where Pig-2-Bac had 100% specificity. The reliability of H-ND6 and H-ND5 was further evidenced to identify locations of the most polluted within the Taihu Lake watershed of China. In general, the microbial DNA markers demonstrated a higher fecal concentration than the mtDNA ones; increasing temperature and sunlight exposure accelerated significantly the decay of all the DNA markers. Results of this study suggest that DNA markers H-ND6, H-ND5, and Pig-2-Bac may be among the best for fecal source tracking in water.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5062121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50621212016-10-24 Evaluation of five microbial and four mitochondrial DNA markers for tracking human and pig fecal pollution in freshwater He, Xiwei Liu, Peng Zheng, Guolu Chen, Huimei Shi, Wei Cui, Yibin Ren, Hongqiang Zhang, Xu-Xiang Sci Rep Article This study systematically evaluated five microbial and four mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) markers, including sensitivities and specificities under PCR method, and fecal concentrations and decay rates in water under qPCR method. The microbial DNA markers were the three human-associated (BacH, HF183 and B.adolescentis) and two pig-associated (Pig-2-Bac and L.amylovorus), while the mtDNA ones were two human- (H-ND6 and H-ND5) and two pig-associated (P-CytB and P-ND5). All the mtDNA markers showed higher sensitivity (100%) than the microbial ones (84.0–88.8%) except Pig-2-Bac (100%). Specificities of the human mtDNA markers (99.1 and 98.1%) were higher than those of the human-associated microbial ones (57.0–88.8%). But this pattern was not observed in the pig-associated markers where Pig-2-Bac had 100% specificity. The reliability of H-ND6 and H-ND5 was further evidenced to identify locations of the most polluted within the Taihu Lake watershed of China. In general, the microbial DNA markers demonstrated a higher fecal concentration than the mtDNA ones; increasing temperature and sunlight exposure accelerated significantly the decay of all the DNA markers. Results of this study suggest that DNA markers H-ND6, H-ND5, and Pig-2-Bac may be among the best for fecal source tracking in water. Nature Publishing Group 2016-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5062121/ /pubmed/27734941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35311 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
He, Xiwei
Liu, Peng
Zheng, Guolu
Chen, Huimei
Shi, Wei
Cui, Yibin
Ren, Hongqiang
Zhang, Xu-Xiang
Evaluation of five microbial and four mitochondrial DNA markers for tracking human and pig fecal pollution in freshwater
title Evaluation of five microbial and four mitochondrial DNA markers for tracking human and pig fecal pollution in freshwater
title_full Evaluation of five microbial and four mitochondrial DNA markers for tracking human and pig fecal pollution in freshwater
title_fullStr Evaluation of five microbial and four mitochondrial DNA markers for tracking human and pig fecal pollution in freshwater
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of five microbial and four mitochondrial DNA markers for tracking human and pig fecal pollution in freshwater
title_short Evaluation of five microbial and four mitochondrial DNA markers for tracking human and pig fecal pollution in freshwater
title_sort evaluation of five microbial and four mitochondrial dna markers for tracking human and pig fecal pollution in freshwater
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5062121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27734941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35311
work_keys_str_mv AT hexiwei evaluationoffivemicrobialandfourmitochondrialdnamarkersfortrackinghumanandpigfecalpollutioninfreshwater
AT liupeng evaluationoffivemicrobialandfourmitochondrialdnamarkersfortrackinghumanandpigfecalpollutioninfreshwater
AT zhengguolu evaluationoffivemicrobialandfourmitochondrialdnamarkersfortrackinghumanandpigfecalpollutioninfreshwater
AT chenhuimei evaluationoffivemicrobialandfourmitochondrialdnamarkersfortrackinghumanandpigfecalpollutioninfreshwater
AT shiwei evaluationoffivemicrobialandfourmitochondrialdnamarkersfortrackinghumanandpigfecalpollutioninfreshwater
AT cuiyibin evaluationoffivemicrobialandfourmitochondrialdnamarkersfortrackinghumanandpigfecalpollutioninfreshwater
AT renhongqiang evaluationoffivemicrobialandfourmitochondrialdnamarkersfortrackinghumanandpigfecalpollutioninfreshwater
AT zhangxuxiang evaluationoffivemicrobialandfourmitochondrialdnamarkersfortrackinghumanandpigfecalpollutioninfreshwater