Cargando…

Comparison of modified chin lift technique with EC technique for mask ventilation in adult apneic patients

BACKGROUND: Mask ventilation (MV) is an essential basic life support skill. We used chin lift maneuver for MV and named as modified chin lift technique (MCL). EC technique is most common technique used for MV. AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of both techniques for MV in term o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajappa, Geetha C., Parate, Leena Harshad, Tejesh, C. A., Prathima, P. T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5062193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27746566
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.191111
_version_ 1782459730561597440
author Rajappa, Geetha C.
Parate, Leena Harshad
Tejesh, C. A.
Prathima, P. T.
author_facet Rajappa, Geetha C.
Parate, Leena Harshad
Tejesh, C. A.
Prathima, P. T.
author_sort Rajappa, Geetha C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mask ventilation (MV) is an essential basic life support skill. We used chin lift maneuver for MV and named as modified chin lift technique (MCL). EC technique is most common technique used for MV. AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of both techniques for MV in term of expired tidal volume (TV). Secondarily, we also assessed the effect of experience on the performance of these both techniques. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study area was operation theater of our hospital. This was a prospective, randomized, crossover study. METHODS: A total 108 adults undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were recruited. In all patients, operators (novice/anesthesiologist) randomly performed both techniques either to start with EC or MCL technique. Expired TV was measured for one minute for each technique. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Paired t-test was used to compare TV. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The mean TV was significantly higher in MCL group than EC group (528.08 [104.96] ml vs. 483.39 [103] ml; P < 0.001). The novice (521.89 [117.9] ml vs. 478.70 [130.29] ml; P < 0.001) as well as anesthesiologists (534.27 [110.85] ml vs. 488.08 [111.6] ml; P < 0.001) was able to generate significantly more TV with MCL technique than EC technique. The TV did not differ significantly between novice and anesthesiologist for EC technique (P = 0.474) or MCL technique (P = 0.187). Novices as well as anesthesiologist felt MCL technique more satisfactory (70%). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2016/04/006874.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5062193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50621932016-10-14 Comparison of modified chin lift technique with EC technique for mask ventilation in adult apneic patients Rajappa, Geetha C. Parate, Leena Harshad Tejesh, C. A. Prathima, P. T. Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Mask ventilation (MV) is an essential basic life support skill. We used chin lift maneuver for MV and named as modified chin lift technique (MCL). EC technique is most common technique used for MV. AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of both techniques for MV in term of expired tidal volume (TV). Secondarily, we also assessed the effect of experience on the performance of these both techniques. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study area was operation theater of our hospital. This was a prospective, randomized, crossover study. METHODS: A total 108 adults undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were recruited. In all patients, operators (novice/anesthesiologist) randomly performed both techniques either to start with EC or MCL technique. Expired TV was measured for one minute for each technique. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Paired t-test was used to compare TV. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The mean TV was significantly higher in MCL group than EC group (528.08 [104.96] ml vs. 483.39 [103] ml; P < 0.001). The novice (521.89 [117.9] ml vs. 478.70 [130.29] ml; P < 0.001) as well as anesthesiologists (534.27 [110.85] ml vs. 488.08 [111.6] ml; P < 0.001) was able to generate significantly more TV with MCL technique than EC technique. The TV did not differ significantly between novice and anesthesiologist for EC technique (P = 0.474) or MCL technique (P = 0.187). Novices as well as anesthesiologist felt MCL technique more satisfactory (70%). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2016/04/006874. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5062193/ /pubmed/27746566 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.191111 Text en Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rajappa, Geetha C.
Parate, Leena Harshad
Tejesh, C. A.
Prathima, P. T.
Comparison of modified chin lift technique with EC technique for mask ventilation in adult apneic patients
title Comparison of modified chin lift technique with EC technique for mask ventilation in adult apneic patients
title_full Comparison of modified chin lift technique with EC technique for mask ventilation in adult apneic patients
title_fullStr Comparison of modified chin lift technique with EC technique for mask ventilation in adult apneic patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of modified chin lift technique with EC technique for mask ventilation in adult apneic patients
title_short Comparison of modified chin lift technique with EC technique for mask ventilation in adult apneic patients
title_sort comparison of modified chin lift technique with ec technique for mask ventilation in adult apneic patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5062193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27746566
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.191111
work_keys_str_mv AT rajappageethac comparisonofmodifiedchinlifttechniquewithectechniqueformaskventilationinadultapneicpatients
AT parateleenaharshad comparisonofmodifiedchinlifttechniquewithectechniqueformaskventilationinadultapneicpatients
AT tejeshca comparisonofmodifiedchinlifttechniquewithectechniqueformaskventilationinadultapneicpatients
AT prathimapt comparisonofmodifiedchinlifttechniquewithectechniqueformaskventilationinadultapneicpatients