Cargando…

Cross-cultural acceptability and utility of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: views of families

BACKGROUND: Screening children for behavioural difficulties requires the use of a tool that is culturally valid. We explored the cross-cultural acceptability and utility of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for pre-school children (aged 3–5) as perceived by families in New Zealand. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kersten, Paula, Dudley, Margaret, Nayar, Shoba, Elder, Hinemoa, Robertson, Heather, Tauroa, Robyn, McPherson, Kathryn M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5062850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27733140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1063-7
_version_ 1782459859057246208
author Kersten, Paula
Dudley, Margaret
Nayar, Shoba
Elder, Hinemoa
Robertson, Heather
Tauroa, Robyn
McPherson, Kathryn M.
author_facet Kersten, Paula
Dudley, Margaret
Nayar, Shoba
Elder, Hinemoa
Robertson, Heather
Tauroa, Robyn
McPherson, Kathryn M.
author_sort Kersten, Paula
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening children for behavioural difficulties requires the use of a tool that is culturally valid. We explored the cross-cultural acceptability and utility of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for pre-school children (aged 3–5) as perceived by families in New Zealand. METHODS: A qualitative interpretive descriptive study (focus groups and interviews) in which 65 participants from five key ethnic groups (New Zealand European, Māori, Pacific, Asian and other immigrant parents) took part. Thematic analysis using an inductive approach, in which the themes identified are strongly linked to the data, was employed. RESULTS: Many parents reported they were unclear about the purpose of the tool, affecting its perceived value. Participants reported not understanding the context in which they should consider the questions and had difficulty understanding some questions and response options. Māori parents generally did not support the questionnaire based approach, preferring face to face interaction. Parents from Māori, Pacific Island, Asian, and new immigrant groups reported the tool lacked explicit consideration of children in their cultural context. Parents discussed the importance of timing and multiple perspectives when interpreting scores from the tool. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this study posed a number of challenges to the use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in New Zealand. Further work is required to develop a tool that is culturally appropriate with good content validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5062850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50628502016-10-17 Cross-cultural acceptability and utility of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: views of families Kersten, Paula Dudley, Margaret Nayar, Shoba Elder, Hinemoa Robertson, Heather Tauroa, Robyn McPherson, Kathryn M. BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Screening children for behavioural difficulties requires the use of a tool that is culturally valid. We explored the cross-cultural acceptability and utility of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for pre-school children (aged 3–5) as perceived by families in New Zealand. METHODS: A qualitative interpretive descriptive study (focus groups and interviews) in which 65 participants from five key ethnic groups (New Zealand European, Māori, Pacific, Asian and other immigrant parents) took part. Thematic analysis using an inductive approach, in which the themes identified are strongly linked to the data, was employed. RESULTS: Many parents reported they were unclear about the purpose of the tool, affecting its perceived value. Participants reported not understanding the context in which they should consider the questions and had difficulty understanding some questions and response options. Māori parents generally did not support the questionnaire based approach, preferring face to face interaction. Parents from Māori, Pacific Island, Asian, and new immigrant groups reported the tool lacked explicit consideration of children in their cultural context. Parents discussed the importance of timing and multiple perspectives when interpreting scores from the tool. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this study posed a number of challenges to the use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in New Zealand. Further work is required to develop a tool that is culturally appropriate with good content validity. BioMed Central 2016-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5062850/ /pubmed/27733140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1063-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kersten, Paula
Dudley, Margaret
Nayar, Shoba
Elder, Hinemoa
Robertson, Heather
Tauroa, Robyn
McPherson, Kathryn M.
Cross-cultural acceptability and utility of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: views of families
title Cross-cultural acceptability and utility of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: views of families
title_full Cross-cultural acceptability and utility of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: views of families
title_fullStr Cross-cultural acceptability and utility of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: views of families
title_full_unstemmed Cross-cultural acceptability and utility of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: views of families
title_short Cross-cultural acceptability and utility of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: views of families
title_sort cross-cultural acceptability and utility of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: views of families
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5062850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27733140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1063-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kerstenpaula crossculturalacceptabilityandutilityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireviewsoffamilies
AT dudleymargaret crossculturalacceptabilityandutilityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireviewsoffamilies
AT nayarshoba crossculturalacceptabilityandutilityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireviewsoffamilies
AT elderhinemoa crossculturalacceptabilityandutilityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireviewsoffamilies
AT robertsonheather crossculturalacceptabilityandutilityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireviewsoffamilies
AT tauroarobyn crossculturalacceptabilityandutilityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireviewsoffamilies
AT mcphersonkathrynm crossculturalacceptabilityandutilityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaireviewsoffamilies