Cargando…
Double checking: a second look
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Double checking is a standard practice in many areas of health care, notwithstanding the lack of evidence supporting its efficacy. We ask in this study: ‘How do front line practitioners conceptualize double checking? What are the weaknesses of double checking? What al...
Autores principales: | Hewitt, Tanya, Chreim, Samia, Forster, Alan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26568537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.12468 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Incident reporting systems: a comparative study of two hospital divisions
por: Hewitt, Tanya, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Fix and forget or fix and report: a qualitative study of tensions at the front line of incident reporting
por: Hewitt, Tanya Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
A Narrative Review of Factors Influencing Peer Support Role Implementation in Mental Health Systems: Implications for Research, Policy and Practice
por: Mirbahaeddin, Elmira, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Work-life boundary management of peer support workers when engaging in virtual mental health support during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative case study
por: Mirbahaeddin, Elmira, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Residents’ perceptions of radon health risks: a qualitative study
por: Khan, Selim M., et al.
Publicado: (2019)