Cargando…

Measuring medicine-related experiences from the patient perspective: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing drive to measure and so improve patients’ experiences and outcomes of health care. This also applies to medicines, given their ubiquity as health care interventions. Patients’ experiences of using medicines vary, and instruments which measure these are seen as an e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katusiime, Barbra, Corlett, Sarah, Reeve, Joanne, Krska, Janet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27785116
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S102198
_version_ 1782459913939714048
author Katusiime, Barbra
Corlett, Sarah
Reeve, Joanne
Krska, Janet
author_facet Katusiime, Barbra
Corlett, Sarah
Reeve, Joanne
Krska, Janet
author_sort Katusiime, Barbra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is an increasing drive to measure and so improve patients’ experiences and outcomes of health care. This also applies to medicines, given their ubiquity as health care interventions. Patients’ experiences of using medicines vary, and instruments which measure these are seen as an essential component to improve care. We aimed to identify generic measures of patients’ experiences of using prescription medicines and to examine their properties and suitability for use in research or practice. METHODS: Multiple electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, CINHAL Plus, PROQOLID(®), and Google Scholar. We identified, critically appraised, and summarized generic questionnaires assessing one or more aspects of the medicine use experience among adult patients using prescription medicines for chronic conditions, and the process of questionnaire development, degree of patient involvement, and/or validation processes. RESULTS: Fifteen questionnaires were included. Of these, nine measures were multidimensional, covering various aspects of medicine use. Six instruments covered only a single domain, assessing a specific facet of using medicines. Domains covered were the following: effectiveness; convenience, practicalities, and/or managing medicines; information, knowledge, and/or understanding; side effects; relationships and/or communication with health professionals; impact on daily living and/or social life; general satisfaction; attitudes; beliefs, concerns, and/or perceptions; medical follow-up and/or adherence-related issues; treatment- and/or medicine-related burden, perceived control, or autonomy; self-confidence about medicine use; availability and accessibility; and medicine-related quality of life. None of the identified questionnaires covered all domains. Instruments varied in the extent of patient involvement in both their development and validation. CONCLUSION: There is a scarcity of psychometrically sound, comprehensive, and generic measures of experiences of using prescription medicines among adult patients living with chronic illnesses. There is a need for further development and/or validation of existing instruments suitable for use in this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5063133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50631332016-10-26 Measuring medicine-related experiences from the patient perspective: a systematic review Katusiime, Barbra Corlett, Sarah Reeve, Joanne Krska, Janet Patient Relat Outcome Meas Review BACKGROUND: There is an increasing drive to measure and so improve patients’ experiences and outcomes of health care. This also applies to medicines, given their ubiquity as health care interventions. Patients’ experiences of using medicines vary, and instruments which measure these are seen as an essential component to improve care. We aimed to identify generic measures of patients’ experiences of using prescription medicines and to examine their properties and suitability for use in research or practice. METHODS: Multiple electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, CINHAL Plus, PROQOLID(®), and Google Scholar. We identified, critically appraised, and summarized generic questionnaires assessing one or more aspects of the medicine use experience among adult patients using prescription medicines for chronic conditions, and the process of questionnaire development, degree of patient involvement, and/or validation processes. RESULTS: Fifteen questionnaires were included. Of these, nine measures were multidimensional, covering various aspects of medicine use. Six instruments covered only a single domain, assessing a specific facet of using medicines. Domains covered were the following: effectiveness; convenience, practicalities, and/or managing medicines; information, knowledge, and/or understanding; side effects; relationships and/or communication with health professionals; impact on daily living and/or social life; general satisfaction; attitudes; beliefs, concerns, and/or perceptions; medical follow-up and/or adherence-related issues; treatment- and/or medicine-related burden, perceived control, or autonomy; self-confidence about medicine use; availability and accessibility; and medicine-related quality of life. None of the identified questionnaires covered all domains. Instruments varied in the extent of patient involvement in both their development and validation. CONCLUSION: There is a scarcity of psychometrically sound, comprehensive, and generic measures of experiences of using prescription medicines among adult patients living with chronic illnesses. There is a need for further development and/or validation of existing instruments suitable for use in this population. Dove Medical Press 2016-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5063133/ /pubmed/27785116 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S102198 Text en © 2016 Katusiime et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Katusiime, Barbra
Corlett, Sarah
Reeve, Joanne
Krska, Janet
Measuring medicine-related experiences from the patient perspective: a systematic review
title Measuring medicine-related experiences from the patient perspective: a systematic review
title_full Measuring medicine-related experiences from the patient perspective: a systematic review
title_fullStr Measuring medicine-related experiences from the patient perspective: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Measuring medicine-related experiences from the patient perspective: a systematic review
title_short Measuring medicine-related experiences from the patient perspective: a systematic review
title_sort measuring medicine-related experiences from the patient perspective: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27785116
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S102198
work_keys_str_mv AT katusiimebarbra measuringmedicinerelatedexperiencesfromthepatientperspectiveasystematicreview
AT corlettsarah measuringmedicinerelatedexperiencesfromthepatientperspectiveasystematicreview
AT reevejoanne measuringmedicinerelatedexperiencesfromthepatientperspectiveasystematicreview
AT krskajanet measuringmedicinerelatedexperiencesfromthepatientperspectiveasystematicreview