Cargando…
Circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure
BACKGROUND: Severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure (AHF) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. There are currently no well‐defined blood biomarkers of response to treatment that can guide management or identify recovery in this patient population. In the present study, we characterized t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12076 |
_version_ | 1782459919091367936 |
---|---|
author | Meredith, Anna J. Dai, Darlene L. Y. Chen, Virginia Hollander, Zsuzsanna Ng, Raymond Kaan, Annemarie Tebbutt, Scott Ramanathan, Krishnan Cheung, Anson McManus, Bruce M. |
author_facet | Meredith, Anna J. Dai, Darlene L. Y. Chen, Virginia Hollander, Zsuzsanna Ng, Raymond Kaan, Annemarie Tebbutt, Scott Ramanathan, Krishnan Cheung, Anson McManus, Bruce M. |
author_sort | Meredith, Anna J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure (AHF) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. There are currently no well‐defined blood biomarkers of response to treatment that can guide management or identify recovery in this patient population. In the present study, we characterized the levels of novel and emerging circulating biomarkers of heart failure in patients with AHF over the first 30 days of medical management or mechanical circulatory support (MCS). We hypothesized a shared a plasma proteomic treatment response would be identifiable in both patient groups, representing reversal of the AHF phenotype. METHODS AND RESULTS: Time course plasma samples of the first 30 days of therapy, obtained from patients managed medically (n = 8) or with implantable MCS (n = 5), underwent semi‐targeted and candidate biomarker analyses, using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mass spectrometry, antibody arrays, and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays. Differentially expressed proteins were identified using robust limma for MRM and antibody array data. Patients managed medically or with implantable MCS had a shared proteomic signature of six plasma proteins: circulating cardiotrophin 1, cardiac troponin T, clusterin, and dickopff 1 increased, while levels of C‐reactive protein and growth differentiation factor 15 decreased in both groups over the 30 day time course. CONCLUSIONS: We have characterized the temporal proteomic signature of clinical recovery in AHF patients managed medically or with MCS, over the first 30 days of treatment. Changes in biomarker expression over the time course of treatment may provide a basis for understanding the biological basis of AHF, potentially identifying novel markers and pathophysiologic mechanisms of recovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5063158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50631582016-10-19 Circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure Meredith, Anna J. Dai, Darlene L. Y. Chen, Virginia Hollander, Zsuzsanna Ng, Raymond Kaan, Annemarie Tebbutt, Scott Ramanathan, Krishnan Cheung, Anson McManus, Bruce M. ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: Severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure (AHF) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. There are currently no well‐defined blood biomarkers of response to treatment that can guide management or identify recovery in this patient population. In the present study, we characterized the levels of novel and emerging circulating biomarkers of heart failure in patients with AHF over the first 30 days of medical management or mechanical circulatory support (MCS). We hypothesized a shared a plasma proteomic treatment response would be identifiable in both patient groups, representing reversal of the AHF phenotype. METHODS AND RESULTS: Time course plasma samples of the first 30 days of therapy, obtained from patients managed medically (n = 8) or with implantable MCS (n = 5), underwent semi‐targeted and candidate biomarker analyses, using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mass spectrometry, antibody arrays, and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays. Differentially expressed proteins were identified using robust limma for MRM and antibody array data. Patients managed medically or with implantable MCS had a shared proteomic signature of six plasma proteins: circulating cardiotrophin 1, cardiac troponin T, clusterin, and dickopff 1 increased, while levels of C‐reactive protein and growth differentiation factor 15 decreased in both groups over the 30 day time course. CONCLUSIONS: We have characterized the temporal proteomic signature of clinical recovery in AHF patients managed medically or with MCS, over the first 30 days of treatment. Changes in biomarker expression over the time course of treatment may provide a basis for understanding the biological basis of AHF, potentially identifying novel markers and pathophysiologic mechanisms of recovery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5063158/ /pubmed/27774271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12076 Text en © 2015 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Meredith, Anna J. Dai, Darlene L. Y. Chen, Virginia Hollander, Zsuzsanna Ng, Raymond Kaan, Annemarie Tebbutt, Scott Ramanathan, Krishnan Cheung, Anson McManus, Bruce M. Circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure |
title | Circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure |
title_full | Circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure |
title_fullStr | Circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure |
title_full_unstemmed | Circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure |
title_short | Circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure |
title_sort | circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12076 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meredithannaj circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure AT daidarlenely circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure AT chenvirginia circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure AT hollanderzsuzsanna circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure AT ngraymond circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure AT kaanannemarie circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure AT tebbuttscott circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure AT ramanathankrishnan circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure AT cheunganson circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure AT mcmanusbrucem circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure |