Cargando…

Circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure

BACKGROUND: Severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure (AHF) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. There are currently no well‐defined blood biomarkers of response to treatment that can guide management or identify recovery in this patient population. In the present study, we characterized t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meredith, Anna J., Dai, Darlene L. Y., Chen, Virginia, Hollander, Zsuzsanna, Ng, Raymond, Kaan, Annemarie, Tebbutt, Scott, Ramanathan, Krishnan, Cheung, Anson, McManus, Bruce M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12076
_version_ 1782459919091367936
author Meredith, Anna J.
Dai, Darlene L. Y.
Chen, Virginia
Hollander, Zsuzsanna
Ng, Raymond
Kaan, Annemarie
Tebbutt, Scott
Ramanathan, Krishnan
Cheung, Anson
McManus, Bruce M.
author_facet Meredith, Anna J.
Dai, Darlene L. Y.
Chen, Virginia
Hollander, Zsuzsanna
Ng, Raymond
Kaan, Annemarie
Tebbutt, Scott
Ramanathan, Krishnan
Cheung, Anson
McManus, Bruce M.
author_sort Meredith, Anna J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure (AHF) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. There are currently no well‐defined blood biomarkers of response to treatment that can guide management or identify recovery in this patient population. In the present study, we characterized the levels of novel and emerging circulating biomarkers of heart failure in patients with AHF over the first 30 days of medical management or mechanical circulatory support (MCS). We hypothesized a shared a plasma proteomic treatment response would be identifiable in both patient groups, representing reversal of the AHF phenotype. METHODS AND RESULTS: Time course plasma samples of the first 30 days of therapy, obtained from patients managed medically (n = 8) or with implantable MCS (n = 5), underwent semi‐targeted and candidate biomarker analyses, using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mass spectrometry, antibody arrays, and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays. Differentially expressed proteins were identified using robust limma for MRM and antibody array data. Patients managed medically or with implantable MCS had a shared proteomic signature of six plasma proteins: circulating cardiotrophin 1, cardiac troponin T, clusterin, and dickopff 1 increased, while levels of C‐reactive protein and growth differentiation factor 15 decreased in both groups over the 30 day time course. CONCLUSIONS: We have characterized the temporal proteomic signature of clinical recovery in AHF patients managed medically or with MCS, over the first 30 days of treatment. Changes in biomarker expression over the time course of treatment may provide a basis for understanding the biological basis of AHF, potentially identifying novel markers and pathophysiologic mechanisms of recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5063158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50631582016-10-19 Circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure Meredith, Anna J. Dai, Darlene L. Y. Chen, Virginia Hollander, Zsuzsanna Ng, Raymond Kaan, Annemarie Tebbutt, Scott Ramanathan, Krishnan Cheung, Anson McManus, Bruce M. ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: Severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure (AHF) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. There are currently no well‐defined blood biomarkers of response to treatment that can guide management or identify recovery in this patient population. In the present study, we characterized the levels of novel and emerging circulating biomarkers of heart failure in patients with AHF over the first 30 days of medical management or mechanical circulatory support (MCS). We hypothesized a shared a plasma proteomic treatment response would be identifiable in both patient groups, representing reversal of the AHF phenotype. METHODS AND RESULTS: Time course plasma samples of the first 30 days of therapy, obtained from patients managed medically (n = 8) or with implantable MCS (n = 5), underwent semi‐targeted and candidate biomarker analyses, using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mass spectrometry, antibody arrays, and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays. Differentially expressed proteins were identified using robust limma for MRM and antibody array data. Patients managed medically or with implantable MCS had a shared proteomic signature of six plasma proteins: circulating cardiotrophin 1, cardiac troponin T, clusterin, and dickopff 1 increased, while levels of C‐reactive protein and growth differentiation factor 15 decreased in both groups over the 30 day time course. CONCLUSIONS: We have characterized the temporal proteomic signature of clinical recovery in AHF patients managed medically or with MCS, over the first 30 days of treatment. Changes in biomarker expression over the time course of treatment may provide a basis for understanding the biological basis of AHF, potentially identifying novel markers and pathophysiologic mechanisms of recovery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5063158/ /pubmed/27774271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12076 Text en © 2015 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Meredith, Anna J.
Dai, Darlene L. Y.
Chen, Virginia
Hollander, Zsuzsanna
Ng, Raymond
Kaan, Annemarie
Tebbutt, Scott
Ramanathan, Krishnan
Cheung, Anson
McManus, Bruce M.
Circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure
title Circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure
title_full Circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure
title_fullStr Circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure
title_full_unstemmed Circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure
title_short Circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure
title_sort circulating biomarker responses to medical management vs. mechanical circulatory support in severe inotrope‐dependent acute heart failure
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27774271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12076
work_keys_str_mv AT meredithannaj circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure
AT daidarlenely circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure
AT chenvirginia circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure
AT hollanderzsuzsanna circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure
AT ngraymond circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure
AT kaanannemarie circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure
AT tebbuttscott circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure
AT ramanathankrishnan circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure
AT cheunganson circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure
AT mcmanusbrucem circulatingbiomarkerresponsestomedicalmanagementvsmechanicalcirculatorysupportinsevereinotropedependentacuteheartfailure