Cargando…

Evaluating Composite Sampling Methods of Bacillus Spores at Low Concentrations

Restoring all facility operations after the 2001 Amerithrax attacks took years to complete, highlighting the need to reduce remediation time. Some of the most time intensive tasks were environmental sampling and sample analyses. Composite sampling allows disparate samples to be combined, with only a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hess, Becky M., Amidan, Brett G., Anderson, Kevin K., Hutchison, Janine R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27736999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164582
_version_ 1782459954271092736
author Hess, Becky M.
Amidan, Brett G.
Anderson, Kevin K.
Hutchison, Janine R.
author_facet Hess, Becky M.
Amidan, Brett G.
Anderson, Kevin K.
Hutchison, Janine R.
author_sort Hess, Becky M.
collection PubMed
description Restoring all facility operations after the 2001 Amerithrax attacks took years to complete, highlighting the need to reduce remediation time. Some of the most time intensive tasks were environmental sampling and sample analyses. Composite sampling allows disparate samples to be combined, with only a single analysis needed, making it a promising method to reduce response times. We developed a statistical experimental design to test three different composite sampling methods: 1) single medium single pass composite (SM-SPC): a single cellulose sponge samples multiple coupons with a single pass across each coupon; 2) single medium multi-pass composite: a single cellulose sponge samples multiple coupons with multiple passes across each coupon (SM-MPC); and 3) multi-medium post-sample composite (MM-MPC): a single cellulose sponge samples a single surface, and then multiple sponges are combined during sample extraction. Five spore concentrations of Bacillus atrophaeus Nakamura spores were tested; concentrations ranged from 5 to 100 CFU/coupon (0.00775 to 0.155 CFU/cm(2)). Study variables included four clean surface materials (stainless steel, vinyl tile, ceramic tile, and painted dry wallboard) and three grime coated/dirty materials (stainless steel, vinyl tile, and ceramic tile). Analysis of variance for the clean study showed two significant factors: composite method (p< 0.0001) and coupon material (p = 0.0006). Recovery efficiency (RE) was higher overall using the MM-MPC method compared to the SM-SPC and SM-MPC methods. RE with the MM-MPC method for concentrations tested (10 to 100 CFU/coupon) was similar for ceramic tile, dry wall, and stainless steel for clean materials. RE was lowest for vinyl tile with both composite methods. Statistical tests for the dirty study showed RE was significantly higher for vinyl and stainless steel materials, but lower for ceramic tile. These results suggest post-sample compositing can be used to reduce sample analysis time when responding to a Bacillus anthracis contamination event of clean or dirty surfaces.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5063342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50633422016-11-04 Evaluating Composite Sampling Methods of Bacillus Spores at Low Concentrations Hess, Becky M. Amidan, Brett G. Anderson, Kevin K. Hutchison, Janine R. PLoS One Research Article Restoring all facility operations after the 2001 Amerithrax attacks took years to complete, highlighting the need to reduce remediation time. Some of the most time intensive tasks were environmental sampling and sample analyses. Composite sampling allows disparate samples to be combined, with only a single analysis needed, making it a promising method to reduce response times. We developed a statistical experimental design to test three different composite sampling methods: 1) single medium single pass composite (SM-SPC): a single cellulose sponge samples multiple coupons with a single pass across each coupon; 2) single medium multi-pass composite: a single cellulose sponge samples multiple coupons with multiple passes across each coupon (SM-MPC); and 3) multi-medium post-sample composite (MM-MPC): a single cellulose sponge samples a single surface, and then multiple sponges are combined during sample extraction. Five spore concentrations of Bacillus atrophaeus Nakamura spores were tested; concentrations ranged from 5 to 100 CFU/coupon (0.00775 to 0.155 CFU/cm(2)). Study variables included four clean surface materials (stainless steel, vinyl tile, ceramic tile, and painted dry wallboard) and three grime coated/dirty materials (stainless steel, vinyl tile, and ceramic tile). Analysis of variance for the clean study showed two significant factors: composite method (p< 0.0001) and coupon material (p = 0.0006). Recovery efficiency (RE) was higher overall using the MM-MPC method compared to the SM-SPC and SM-MPC methods. RE with the MM-MPC method for concentrations tested (10 to 100 CFU/coupon) was similar for ceramic tile, dry wall, and stainless steel for clean materials. RE was lowest for vinyl tile with both composite methods. Statistical tests for the dirty study showed RE was significantly higher for vinyl and stainless steel materials, but lower for ceramic tile. These results suggest post-sample compositing can be used to reduce sample analysis time when responding to a Bacillus anthracis contamination event of clean or dirty surfaces. Public Library of Science 2016-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5063342/ /pubmed/27736999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164582 Text en © 2016 Hess et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hess, Becky M.
Amidan, Brett G.
Anderson, Kevin K.
Hutchison, Janine R.
Evaluating Composite Sampling Methods of Bacillus Spores at Low Concentrations
title Evaluating Composite Sampling Methods of Bacillus Spores at Low Concentrations
title_full Evaluating Composite Sampling Methods of Bacillus Spores at Low Concentrations
title_fullStr Evaluating Composite Sampling Methods of Bacillus Spores at Low Concentrations
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Composite Sampling Methods of Bacillus Spores at Low Concentrations
title_short Evaluating Composite Sampling Methods of Bacillus Spores at Low Concentrations
title_sort evaluating composite sampling methods of bacillus spores at low concentrations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27736999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164582
work_keys_str_mv AT hessbeckym evaluatingcompositesamplingmethodsofbacillussporesatlowconcentrations
AT amidanbrettg evaluatingcompositesamplingmethodsofbacillussporesatlowconcentrations
AT andersonkevink evaluatingcompositesamplingmethodsofbacillussporesatlowconcentrations
AT hutchisonjaniner evaluatingcompositesamplingmethodsofbacillussporesatlowconcentrations