Cargando…

Can Parameters Other than Minimal Axial Diameter in MRI and PET/CT Further Improve Diagnostic Accuracy for Equivocal Retropharyngeal Lymph Nodes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma?

PURPOSE: Minimal axial diameter (MIAD) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was recognized as the most useful parameter in diagnosing lateral retropharyngeal lymph (LRPL) nodes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aims to explore the additional nodal parameters in MRI and positron emission t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yu-Wen, Wu, Chin-Shun, Zhang, Guo-Yi, Chang, Chih-Han, Cheng, Kuo-Sheng, Yao, Wei-Jen, Chang, Yu-Kang, Chien, Tsair-Wei, Lin, Li-Ching, Lin, Keng-Ren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27736927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163741
_version_ 1782459960819449856
author Wang, Yu-Wen
Wu, Chin-Shun
Zhang, Guo-Yi
Chang, Chih-Han
Cheng, Kuo-Sheng
Yao, Wei-Jen
Chang, Yu-Kang
Chien, Tsair-Wei
Lin, Li-Ching
Lin, Keng-Ren
author_facet Wang, Yu-Wen
Wu, Chin-Shun
Zhang, Guo-Yi
Chang, Chih-Han
Cheng, Kuo-Sheng
Yao, Wei-Jen
Chang, Yu-Kang
Chien, Tsair-Wei
Lin, Li-Ching
Lin, Keng-Ren
author_sort Wang, Yu-Wen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Minimal axial diameter (MIAD) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was recognized as the most useful parameter in diagnosing lateral retropharyngeal lymph (LRPL) nodes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aims to explore the additional nodal parameters in MRI and positron emission tomography–computed tomography for increasing the prediction accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 663 LRPL nodes were retrospectively collected from 335 patients with NPC. The LRPL nodes ascertained on follow-up MRI were considered positive for metastases. First, the optimal cutoff value of each parameter was derived for each parameter. In addition, neural network (NN) nodal evaluation was tested for all combinations of three parameters, namely MIAD, maximal axial diameter (MAAD), and maximal coronal diameter (MACD). The optimal approach was determined through brute force attack, and the results of two methods were compared using a bootstrap sampling method. Second, the mean standard uptake value (NSUVmean) was added as the fourth parameter and tested in the same manner for 410 nodes in 219 patients. RESULTS: In first and second analysis, the accuracy rate (percentage) for the MIAD was 89.0% (590/663) and 89.0% (365/410), with the optimal cutoff values being 6.1 mm and 6.0 mm, respectively. With the combination of all three and four parameters, the accuracy rate of the NN was 89% (288/332) and 88.8% (182/205), respectively. In prediction, the optimal combinations of the three and four parameters resulted in correct identification of three (accuracy: 593/663, 89.4%) and six additional nodes (371/410, 90.5%), representing 4% (3/73) and 13.3% (6/45) decreases in incorrect prediction, respectively. CONCLUSION: NPC LRPL nodes with an MIAD ≥ 6.1 mm are positive. Among nodes with an MIAD < 6.1 mm, if the NSUVmean ≥ 2.6 or MACD ≥ 25 mm and MAAD ≥ 8 mm, the nodes are positive; otherwise, they are negative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5063369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50633692016-11-04 Can Parameters Other than Minimal Axial Diameter in MRI and PET/CT Further Improve Diagnostic Accuracy for Equivocal Retropharyngeal Lymph Nodes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma? Wang, Yu-Wen Wu, Chin-Shun Zhang, Guo-Yi Chang, Chih-Han Cheng, Kuo-Sheng Yao, Wei-Jen Chang, Yu-Kang Chien, Tsair-Wei Lin, Li-Ching Lin, Keng-Ren PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Minimal axial diameter (MIAD) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was recognized as the most useful parameter in diagnosing lateral retropharyngeal lymph (LRPL) nodes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aims to explore the additional nodal parameters in MRI and positron emission tomography–computed tomography for increasing the prediction accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 663 LRPL nodes were retrospectively collected from 335 patients with NPC. The LRPL nodes ascertained on follow-up MRI were considered positive for metastases. First, the optimal cutoff value of each parameter was derived for each parameter. In addition, neural network (NN) nodal evaluation was tested for all combinations of three parameters, namely MIAD, maximal axial diameter (MAAD), and maximal coronal diameter (MACD). The optimal approach was determined through brute force attack, and the results of two methods were compared using a bootstrap sampling method. Second, the mean standard uptake value (NSUVmean) was added as the fourth parameter and tested in the same manner for 410 nodes in 219 patients. RESULTS: In first and second analysis, the accuracy rate (percentage) for the MIAD was 89.0% (590/663) and 89.0% (365/410), with the optimal cutoff values being 6.1 mm and 6.0 mm, respectively. With the combination of all three and four parameters, the accuracy rate of the NN was 89% (288/332) and 88.8% (182/205), respectively. In prediction, the optimal combinations of the three and four parameters resulted in correct identification of three (accuracy: 593/663, 89.4%) and six additional nodes (371/410, 90.5%), representing 4% (3/73) and 13.3% (6/45) decreases in incorrect prediction, respectively. CONCLUSION: NPC LRPL nodes with an MIAD ≥ 6.1 mm are positive. Among nodes with an MIAD < 6.1 mm, if the NSUVmean ≥ 2.6 or MACD ≥ 25 mm and MAAD ≥ 8 mm, the nodes are positive; otherwise, they are negative. Public Library of Science 2016-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5063369/ /pubmed/27736927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163741 Text en © 2016 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Yu-Wen
Wu, Chin-Shun
Zhang, Guo-Yi
Chang, Chih-Han
Cheng, Kuo-Sheng
Yao, Wei-Jen
Chang, Yu-Kang
Chien, Tsair-Wei
Lin, Li-Ching
Lin, Keng-Ren
Can Parameters Other than Minimal Axial Diameter in MRI and PET/CT Further Improve Diagnostic Accuracy for Equivocal Retropharyngeal Lymph Nodes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma?
title Can Parameters Other than Minimal Axial Diameter in MRI and PET/CT Further Improve Diagnostic Accuracy for Equivocal Retropharyngeal Lymph Nodes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma?
title_full Can Parameters Other than Minimal Axial Diameter in MRI and PET/CT Further Improve Diagnostic Accuracy for Equivocal Retropharyngeal Lymph Nodes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma?
title_fullStr Can Parameters Other than Minimal Axial Diameter in MRI and PET/CT Further Improve Diagnostic Accuracy for Equivocal Retropharyngeal Lymph Nodes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma?
title_full_unstemmed Can Parameters Other than Minimal Axial Diameter in MRI and PET/CT Further Improve Diagnostic Accuracy for Equivocal Retropharyngeal Lymph Nodes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma?
title_short Can Parameters Other than Minimal Axial Diameter in MRI and PET/CT Further Improve Diagnostic Accuracy for Equivocal Retropharyngeal Lymph Nodes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma?
title_sort can parameters other than minimal axial diameter in mri and pet/ct further improve diagnostic accuracy for equivocal retropharyngeal lymph nodes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27736927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163741
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyuwen canparametersotherthanminimalaxialdiameterinmriandpetctfurtherimprovediagnosticaccuracyforequivocalretropharyngeallymphnodesinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT wuchinshun canparametersotherthanminimalaxialdiameterinmriandpetctfurtherimprovediagnosticaccuracyforequivocalretropharyngeallymphnodesinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT zhangguoyi canparametersotherthanminimalaxialdiameterinmriandpetctfurtherimprovediagnosticaccuracyforequivocalretropharyngeallymphnodesinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT changchihhan canparametersotherthanminimalaxialdiameterinmriandpetctfurtherimprovediagnosticaccuracyforequivocalretropharyngeallymphnodesinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT chengkuosheng canparametersotherthanminimalaxialdiameterinmriandpetctfurtherimprovediagnosticaccuracyforequivocalretropharyngeallymphnodesinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT yaoweijen canparametersotherthanminimalaxialdiameterinmriandpetctfurtherimprovediagnosticaccuracyforequivocalretropharyngeallymphnodesinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT changyukang canparametersotherthanminimalaxialdiameterinmriandpetctfurtherimprovediagnosticaccuracyforequivocalretropharyngeallymphnodesinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT chientsairwei canparametersotherthanminimalaxialdiameterinmriandpetctfurtherimprovediagnosticaccuracyforequivocalretropharyngeallymphnodesinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT linliching canparametersotherthanminimalaxialdiameterinmriandpetctfurtherimprovediagnosticaccuracyforequivocalretropharyngeallymphnodesinnasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT linkengren canparametersotherthanminimalaxialdiameterinmriandpetctfurtherimprovediagnosticaccuracyforequivocalretropharyngeallymphnodesinnasopharyngealcarcinoma